RE: Driven: BMW 1 Series M Coupé
Discussion
nickpan said:
inkiboo said:
Fittster said:
inkiboo said:
Oh god I am so massively bored with everyone on PH going on about weight. If you want a car with a decent interior, good sound isolation and enhanced safety equipment then it is going to weigh more than the previous generation car.
If you don't want all that, buy a Lotus Elise.
No room for improved engineering or light weight materials? If you don't want all that, buy a Lotus Elise.
Also - sure this has been discussed to death but their unwillingness to adopt the M1 name suggest there's a BMW supercar in the pipeline?
chippy17 said:
inkiboo said:
Oh god I am so massively bored with everyone on PH going on about weight. If you want a car with a decent interior, good sound isolation and enhanced safety equipment then it is going to weigh more than the previous generation car.
If you don't want all that, buy a Lotus Elise.
Porsche seem to manage it...why can't BMWIf you don't want all that, buy a Lotus Elise.
this car should weigh 1350-1400 not 1500
As with people, it's not at all easy to lose weight.
*adjustable carbon fibre wing, a plastic engine cover, and a lightweight plastic rear window
Edited by Mermaid on Tuesday 12th October 13:23
Dagnut said:
Am I the only one who thinks the wheels are too big? I think they look ridiculous. Why not just fit 18's they are plenty big enough for a car that size
The wheel, tyre, arch combination gives it a euro look that I can't stand. It makes it look like the rear has been dropped too low and the tyres are stretched:I suppose it's the next phase in the 'M'arketing divisions downward spiral.
1) 'M' badges on all models
2) X5M & X6M
3) Pre-chav'd M1
CliveM said:
Any car that's described as a compromise due to the sign of the times is a bit of a disappointment. That it's an M car is an even bigger disappointment.
1500 kg?!?!?! Is that really the best that they could do? I'll have an M3 thanks, despite wanting a smaller car than that.
My sentiments exactly!1500 kg?!?!?! Is that really the best that they could do? I'll have an M3 thanks, despite wanting a smaller car than that.
Sounds heavy, and I know turbos have less lag, and are more efficient these days, but frankly this needed to be N/A to really get me excited (even though I knew it never would be).
Price will be interesting. At circa £40k, there isn't really much about this car that really grabs my attention.
Still, keeping an open mind, and will wait for official details frm the release. It does look quite good though.
TheRoadWarrior said:
inkiboo said:
Oh god I am so massively bored with everyone on PH going on about weight. If you want a car with a decent interior, good sound isolation and enhanced safety equipment then it is going to weigh more than the previous generation car.
If you don't want all that, buy a Lotus Elise.
Better get your skates on if you want a lightweight Elise... the way lotus are going, looks like the next one will be heavier than the BMW.If you don't want all that, buy a Lotus Elise.
This really isn't what that tii liveried showcar promised to be, I'm still optimistic that BMW will eventually offer something lighter and simpler. I really don't see why an 'M' version has to be faster than a 135i on the motorway, but I would happily buy an M version which was more spartan and less powerful - can we ditch the turbos please ? An M car you drive on the torque ?! Not in my garage.
Mermaid said:
aeropilot said:
As the next M3 will go down to a TT 6 cyl, so the next gen 1M will get a TT 4 cyl..... apprentley.
Does make you think how advanced the Audi RS2 was in 1995 with it's 2.2 litre 5 pot Turbo producing 315ps.Andysywv said:
This really isn't what that tii liveried showcar promised to be, I'm still optimistic that BMW will eventually offer something lighter and simpler. I really don't see why an 'M' version has to be faster than a 135i on the motorway, but I would happily buy an M version which was more spartan and less powerful - can we ditch the turbos please ? An M car you drive on the torque ?! Not in my garage.
Buy a used M3 CSL at £30k, simples It will probably never get better than that.
Audi TTRS 1450 + 75 = 1525 / 335bhp (manual)
Cayman S 1425 kg / 295bhp (manual)
370z 1496 + 75 = 1571 kg / 323bhp (manual)
BMW 135i 1530 kg / 302bhp (manual)
BMW Z4 sDrive35is 1600 kg / 340bhp (7-speed DSG)
BWM 335i M Sport 1600kg / 306bhp (manual)
M3 Coupe 1655kg / 420bhp (manual)
Ariel Atom 456 + 75 = 531 kg / 245-300 bhp (manual)
Audi S3 1515 + 75 = 1590 / 261bhp (auto)
Caparo T1 689kg / 575bhp (manual)
Lotus Exige S 935 + 75 = 1010kg / 220bhp (manual & ac marked as an option)
Mercedes Benz SLK 350 1505kg / 305hp (auto 7 tronic
Mercedes Benz SLK 55AMG 1575kg / 360hp (auto 7 tronic)
BMW 1-M 1500kg / 350hp(manual - numbers to be confirmed)
Cayman S 1425 kg / 295bhp (manual)
370z 1496 + 75 = 1571 kg / 323bhp (manual)
BMW 135i 1530 kg / 302bhp (manual)
BMW Z4 sDrive35is 1600 kg / 340bhp (7-speed DSG)
BWM 335i M Sport 1600kg / 306bhp (manual)
M3 Coupe 1655kg / 420bhp (manual)
Ariel Atom 456 + 75 = 531 kg / 245-300 bhp (manual)
Audi S3 1515 + 75 = 1590 / 261bhp (auto)
Caparo T1 689kg / 575bhp (manual)
Lotus Exige S 935 + 75 = 1010kg / 220bhp (manual & ac marked as an option)
Mercedes Benz SLK 350 1505kg / 305hp (auto 7 tronic
Mercedes Benz SLK 55AMG 1575kg / 360hp (auto 7 tronic)
BMW 1-M 1500kg / 350hp(manual - numbers to be confirmed)
Car | Weight KG (inc driver) |
---|---|
Atom | 531 |
Caparo T1 | 689 |
Lotus Exige S | 1010 |
Cayman S | 1425 |
BMW 1 Series M Coupe | 1500 TBC |
SLK 350 | 1505 |
Audi TTRS | 1525 |
BMW 135i | 1530 |
370z | 1571 |
SLK 55AMG | 1575 |
S3 | 1590 |
BMW Z4 sDrive35is | 1600 |
BMW 335i M Sport | 1600 |
BMW M3 Coupe | 1655 |
It looks nice but I'm struggling to see why anyone would buy this car over the E92 M3.
The weight differential isn't going to sway you and if cost is the issue, buy a 'nearly new' E92 for similar money.
I guess it's benefits are the fuel economy and the tuning benefits which will probably end up cancelling each other out.
The weight differential isn't going to sway you and if cost is the issue, buy a 'nearly new' E92 for similar money.
I guess it's benefits are the fuel economy and the tuning benefits which will probably end up cancelling each other out.
Have to agree with inkiboo, it's the same st every time a car is released. Just accept that cars are heavier now and people who want lightweight specials are in the minority. Lexus couldn't even get the £350,000 LFA under 1500kg. Mainstream lightweight cars are gone, thing of the past
Dagnut said:
Have to agree with inkiboo, it's the same st every time a car is released. Just accept that cars are heavier now and people who want lightweight specials are in the minority. Lexus couldn't even get the £350,000 LFA under 1500kg. Mainstream lightweight cars are gone, thing of the past
It's not the weight for me, it's the crappy engine.Dagnut said:
Have to agree with inkiboo, it's the same st every time a car is released. Just accept that cars are heavier now and people who want lightweight specials are in the minority. Lexus couldn't even get the £350,000 LFA under 1500kg. Mainstream lightweight cars are gone, thing of the past
Renault seem to be managing to produce some mainstream light cars though? I'm thinking phase 2 clio 172 cup which had thinner glass, no abs(!), etc etc to reduce weight. Then there was the R.26.R (or whatever it was called) Megane which was also quite light...pilchardthecat said:
Dagnut said:
Have to agree with inkiboo, it's the same st every time a car is released. Just accept that cars are heavier now and people who want lightweight specials are in the minority. Lexus couldn't even get the £350,000 LFA under 1500kg. Mainstream lightweight cars are gone, thing of the past
It's not the weight for me, it's the crappy engine.OK we all know in reality this car won't be any more economical and the testing is biased but again BMW's hands are tied. BMW IMO held on to the N/A approach as long as possible, You all act like M engineers are turning there back on you, do you honestly think that guys who created the E46 CSl aren't complaining themselves at these regulations? These are the sh!tty times we live in to produce a high volume performance car.
bmthnick1981 said:
Dagnut said:
Have to agree with inkiboo, it's the same st every time a car is released. Just accept that cars are heavier now and people who want lightweight specials are in the minority. Lexus couldn't even get the £350,000 LFA under 1500kg. Mainstream lightweight cars are gone, thing of the past
Renault seem to be managing to produce some mainstream light cars though? I'm thinking phase 2 clio 172 cup which had thinner glass, no abs(!), etc etc to reduce weight. Then there was the R.26.R (or whatever it was called) Megane which was also quite light...bmthnick1981 said:
Dagnut said:
Have to agree with inkiboo, it's the same st every time a car is released. Just accept that cars are heavier now and people who want lightweight specials are in the minority. Lexus couldn't even get the £350,000 LFA under 1500kg. Mainstream lightweight cars are gone, thing of the past
Renault seem to be managing to produce some mainstream light cars though? I'm thinking phase 2 clio 172 cup which had thinner glass, no abs(!), etc etc to reduce weight. Then there was the R.26.R (or whatever it was called) Megane which was also quite light...Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff