RE: No, No, Nano
Discussion
I thought Luton was more Bangladeshi? Oh well, learn something new every day.
Anyway, Ferrari ought to be very scared. If Tata can make a car that spontaneously combusts just as well for so little money, it could actually do what the Honda NSX failed to. Actually, maybe that 'exclusive' paint scheme might just do it for those buyers with more money than taste.
Anyway, Ferrari ought to be very scared. If Tata can make a car that spontaneously combusts just as well for so little money, it could actually do what the Honda NSX failed to. Actually, maybe that 'exclusive' paint scheme might just do it for those buyers with more money than taste.
Not sure what the issue is to be honest! I like it. It is cheap, simple and provides honest motoring for those not interested in cars (which is probably the majority of people).
No, it is not an enthusiast's car but surely no worse than a Smart FourTwo or bloody Prius
. Especially for £1.5k...
No, it is not an enthusiast's car but surely no worse than a Smart FourTwo or bloody Prius
. Especially for £1.5k...
Simond S said:
jasongti said:
Bobberz I dont think its appropraite to say it actually like a religious monument which could cause some offence.
On topic its not a very good looking car.
To be honest you'd need to be so far up your own arse to be offended by that you probably wouldnt see out. On topic its not a very good looking car.
jasongti said:
Simond S said:
jasongti said:
Bobberz I dont think its appropraite to say it actually like a religious monument which could cause some offence.
On topic its not a very good looking car.
To be honest you'd need to be so far up your own arse to be offended by that you probably wouldnt see out. On topic its not a very good looking car.
I simply was trying to point out the fact that it was like putting a gold facade on the electric jeepney: overly gaudy accoutrements on an unworthy vehicle. bobberz said:
jasongti said:
Simond S said:
jasongti said:
Bobberz I dont think its appropraite to say it actually like a religious monument which could cause some offence.
On topic its not a very good looking car.
To be honest you'd need to be so far up your own arse to be offended by that you probably wouldnt see out. On topic its not a very good looking car.
I simply was trying to point out the fact that it was like putting a gold facade on the electric jeepney: overly gaudy accoutrements on an unworthy vehicle. 
AtomMan said:
Not sure what the issue is to be honest! I like it. It is cheap, simple and provides honest motoring for those not interested in cars (which is probably the majority of people).
No, it is not an enthusiast's car but surely no worse than a Smart FourTwo or bloody Prius. Especially for £1.5k...
It's obviously much worse than a Prius, and probably a bit worse than a smart.No, it is not an enthusiast's car but surely no worse than a Smart FourTwo or bloody Prius
. Especially for £1.5k...As for those trucks, they look ace.
p.s. I voted it a 10, not sure how much that will skew the scores.
XitUp said:
It's obviously much worse than a Prius, and probably a bit worse than a smart.
As for those trucks, they look ace.
p.s. I voted it a 10, not sure how much that will skew the scores.
Those trucks are brilliant - a lot more interesting than the standard white van and Asda/Tesco/Van Morrison etc lorries As for those trucks, they look ace.
p.s. I voted it a 10, not sure how much that will skew the scores.
I will rate it a four. It's a simple cheap car and its major fault is just a paint job.
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff