RE: SOTW: Honda Prelude

RE: SOTW: Honda Prelude

Author
Discussion

Usergonemad

50 posts

197 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
Truly a great SotW! Potential buyers beware, despite the tall greenhouse there isn't all that much headroom for those long of torso. I couldn't live with one comfortably, though I fit fine in any MX-5. The great looks compliment some of the last really fine engineering that Honda ever offered. It's a driver's car, pure and simple, and even today it's a fantastic choice for the enthusiast.

stoney5122

1 posts

160 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
These were a brilliant old car. Only problem I ever had with them was the dreaded tin worm that invariably infested the rear arches of nearly all 90's preludes/accords/rover 600's.

TRUENOSAM

763 posts

171 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
I like it. I quite like the styling too

Good engine too, I had the slightly uprated one in my Accord type-r. Went well for a n/a car

With these feet

5,728 posts

216 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
stoney5122 said:
These were a brilliant old car. Only problem I ever had with them was the dreaded tin worm that invariably infested the rear arches of nearly all 90's preludes/accords/rover 600's.
The way you wrote that implied it was a UK built car, the Accord was (only the one that mirrored the 600 Rover) built in the US and Japan. The Prelude was only ever Japan.
True though how the rust set in, but there seem to be more old Hondas around than British (UK built) cars of similar vintage.

tezzer

983 posts

187 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
Well, to can that myth, my Accord hasn't got a spot of rust, ANYWHERE !

1999, 90,000 miles and still truly spotless, inside, and out !

Edited by tezzer on Saturday 1st January 16:22

Vic Cooper

Original Poster:

230 posts

170 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
I'd burn it if there would be rust anywhere on a 11 years old body. wink

grumpy52

5,598 posts

167 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all

only thing honda on this is the badge and some of the main passenger cell,has a lot of carbon,cosworth yb ,hewland transaxle,ex spice brakes and susp .ex rod birley ex peter thurston .cost a bit more than a bag of sand tho !!

urmm

85 posts

193 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
Escort Si-130 said:
They seemed to be popular with some people of a certain race.
Innit bro

Car Enthusiast 1

28 posts

161 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
The honda prelude is a fantastic car! It will never be dead and buried. I've actually got one, but the older version which fits slighty better with my liking wink. I converted it to a track car, runs on round about 300 horses! 2.8L V-tec. So it's all good in the hood.

Bassfiend

5,530 posts

251 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
grumpy52 said:
only thing honda on this is the badge and some of the main passenger cell,has a lot of carbon,cosworth yb ,hewland transaxle,ex spice brakes and susp .ex rod birley ex peter thurston .cost a bit more than a bag of sand tho !!
Is that the same Rod Birley that now runs an Escort WRC?

A couple of mates keep sniffing at his heels in the Dunlop Classic Saloon Car Championship (or whatever it is that they now call it)...

biggrin

Phil

cazzer

8,883 posts

249 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
Got one sittin on me drive doin nowt.

First 300 quid takes it smile

golemgrey

44 posts

212 months

Sunday 2nd January 2011
quotequote all
Drove one when testing for my first ever car. This was a front runner but in the end bought an FC RX-7, but the Honda was a damn fun drive. The motor had plenty of revvy feel, felt taught as a chassis even 13 years old and was so tempted, but this one had hail damage... expensive to fix. frown Otherwise though, it was peachy.

The FC was a great car and I'd choose it again, but I think I'd have loved the Preude on the track more... had really tight suspension in VTi-R, or this one did. Bit harsher though and I doubt it'd have fitted campng gear for two people ike the FC.

6potdave

2,310 posts

214 months

Sunday 2nd January 2011
quotequote all
I remember my dad looking at these back when they first came out. It was between that and a BMW E34 530i. At the time I was glad he went for the BM but looking back the Prelude has aged better. The 4WS thing always confused me though, there are quite a few Japanese cars with this, but no one else seemed to have followed suit. Does it really work?

ApexJimi

25,010 posts

244 months

Sunday 2nd January 2011
quotequote all
6potdave said:
The 4WS thing always confused me though, there are quite a few Japanese cars with this, but no one else seemed to have followed suit. Does it really work?
Yes, it does work as intended. It makes parking ridiculously easy, and at higher speeds, it does a pretty good job of keeping understeer at bay. If memory serves correctly, the 4WS was originally intended to make for more stable direction changes at speed.

It's not without trade-offs though, the 4WS system adds more weight, with the non 4WS JDM BB4 car being regarded as the purest version of the 4th gen. The 4WS can also make the car feel a little bit artificially pointy at times.

nottyash

4,670 posts

196 months

Sunday 2nd January 2011
quotequote all
6potdave said:
I remember my dad looking at these back when they first came out. It was between that and a BMW E34 530i. At the time I was glad he went for the BM but looking back the Prelude has aged better. The 4WS thing always confused me though, there are quite a few Japanese cars with this, but no one else seemed to have followed suit. Does it really work?
Its a fantastic system. Below around 25mph the rear wheels turn the opposite way to the front which really assists parking, when over this speed they turn the same direction.
At first it feels like the back is coming around but you soon get used to it.

dinkel

26,959 posts

259 months

Sunday 2nd January 2011
quotequote all
The last Prelude Honda was a GT cruiser built for comfort. This one featured here can be made into a 'sportscar'.

dern

14,055 posts

280 months

Sunday 2nd January 2011
quotequote all
Had a jap import si version of one of these for three years, great car, very reliable. Got bored of the vtec on/off nature of it after a while but at least it always worked unlike some of the more sporty cars I've had since. Don't understand the comments about the interior... always found it a nice place to be with an unobtrusive and subtle interior (no where near as tacky as my old scoob for example).

Edited by dern on Sunday 2nd January 15:07

nickwilcock

1,522 posts

248 months

Sunday 2nd January 2011
quotequote all
The electronic 4WS was very clever, but needed a large amount of cooling and 'fail centre' devices. I'm told that it used up to 80 amps at its maximum! Whereas the mechanical 4WS of the earlier version gave you finger-light steering and worked brilliantly with an elegant simplicity. It was strictly steering wheel angle related, whereas the later electronic version had inputs from steering wheel angle and rate, wheel speed and other factors..

The VTEC engine was very reliable. Also, if you rev to the limit and then change up, you will still be in the VTEC zone in the next gear - the ratios are very well chosen. But if you use VTEC a lot, expect it to be rather thirsty.

I didn't like the original 4th generation Prelude, but the '93-ish facelift tidied up the car, improved the dashboard and allowed more boot space, thanks to a space-saver tyre.

Only thing I never really liked was that the superb moon roof of the 3rd generation was replaced by a small steel sunroof which retracted back over the top of the roof structure.

nottyash

4,670 posts

196 months

Sunday 2nd January 2011
quotequote all
nickwilcock said:
The electronic 4WS was very clever, but needed a large amount of cooling and 'fail centre' devices. I'm told that it used up to 80 amps at its maximum! Whereas the mechanical 4WS of the earlier version gave you finger-light steering and worked brilliantly with an elegant simplicity. It was strictly steering wheel angle related, whereas the later electronic version had inputs from steering wheel angle and rate, wheel speed and other factors..

The VTEC engine was very reliable. Also, if you rev to the limit and then change up, you will still be in the VTEC zone in the next gear - the ratios are very well chosen. But if you use VTEC a lot, expect it to be rather thirsty.

I didn't like the original 4th generation Prelude, but the '93-ish facelift tidied up the car, improved the dashboard and allowed more boot space, thanks to a space-saver tyre.

Only thing I never really liked was that the superb moon roof of the 3rd generation was replaced by a small steel sunroof which retracted back over the top of the roof structure.
I drove a friends older 2.0-16v with the mechanical 4WS and thought it was too light. I like the wieghted 4th and 5th gen.

Ive had 2 4th gens, a Jap SI and a UK version aswell as 2 UK gen 5 red top cars(all Manual 2.2VTIs) I still think the Jap gen 4 was fastest top speed, I think the UK gen 5 red tops are lower geared as they redline in 5th gear at the claimed 143 MPH top speed
My 5th Gen Sunroof is back to being glass, the 4th Gen had a rust issue.

I like the front of the 4th gen, the back of the 5th gen, the dash on the 4th and the seating positions of the 5th. The 4th gen gave me a bad back.cry

LotusAlfaV6bloke

203 posts

193 months

Sunday 2nd January 2011
quotequote all
Round of applause please to Golemgrey for having an FC as his first ever car!

I had a rubbish VW Golf 1.1L.....