RE: Ferrari FF Shock: It's A Four-Wheel-Drive Hatch

RE: Ferrari FF Shock: It's A Four-Wheel-Drive Hatch

Author
Discussion

Killer2005

19,651 posts

229 months

Friday 21st January 2011
quotequote all
I really like that, but I do really love the breadvan shape

Rawwr

22,722 posts

235 months

Friday 21st January 2011
quotequote all
I actually think that has quite a sexy profile, which is unusual for a modern Ferrari.

CampDavid

9,145 posts

199 months

Friday 21st January 2011
quotequote all
ctallchris said:
It looks nice for a £70,000 car but it could well struggle if they overprice it. It certainly isn't pretty for a ferrari
I'll take a punt at it being £250k. Certainly no less than 200grand as that impacts on the 599

evenflow

8,788 posts

283 months

Friday 21st January 2011
quotequote all
I love Ferraris.

I love BMW breadvans.

This is on my lottery list. FANTASTIC.

bremb0

264 posts

160 months

Friday 21st January 2011
quotequote all
Dagnut said:
bremb0 said:


Did you even read the article?
Yes, why?

"Although the Pininfarina-designed body appears to have come from a brief that called for the adding of BMW M coupe and Reliant Scimitar genes into the Ferrari mix, and although the new 4x4 drivertrain is rather a departure from the norm, the FF sticks to its knitting with a V12 powerplant up front."

It's pretty much nigh on identical to the beemer.

I personally wouldn't buy it if I was looking at a ferrari.



Edited by bremb0 on Friday 21st January 12:08

jamieboy

5,911 posts

230 months

Friday 21st January 2011
quotequote all
r11co said:
Douglas Arfempty said:
BMW M Coupe anyone?
I was thinking more this..

-Alfa Romeo 8C-
More* like the original Brera concept, if anything.



* "more like" meaning "more, but still not very much like" wink

SleeperCell

5,591 posts

243 months

Friday 21st January 2011
quotequote all
LongLiveTazio said:
They must be aware they're sharing a name with Jensen. Pretty shoddy from Ferrari IMO. Someone must own the rights to it still, surely?
They aren't calling it a Jensen FF nor saying the FF stands for Ferguson Formula. It's like when Pontiac nicked the GTO designation from Ferrari except back then the 250GTO was a current model. Anyway could have been worse, they could have called it the effeff like those Fiat 500 esseesse

GTenV

10 posts

167 months

Friday 21st January 2011
quotequote all
Despite concerns that the whole concept is potentially sacreligious, I actually think it's a very good looking car.

I've always liked the Citroen C4...

Stuart

11,635 posts

252 months

Friday 21st January 2011
quotequote all
I LOVE it. Looks absolutely stunning. thumbup

Killer2005

19,651 posts

229 months

Friday 21st January 2011
quotequote all
Oh and one more look-a-like


British Beef

2,219 posts

166 months

Friday 21st January 2011
quotequote all
Great, a Ferrari for the family, Kids in the back dog in the boot and lets go skiing!!!!

Where this fails, is that at +/-£200k, any prospective owners (im guessing), will own luxury estates / 4x4s with REAL seating for 4 and a proper boot.

If you want a new Ferarri it is a 3rd or 4th (or 5th, 6th....) car and does not need to fullfill practical demands of an everyday car / family wagon.

HOWEVER, I will eat my hat (and shoes and everything else I own) if Ferrari market it as an every day car at say under £100k, then that practicality and 4x4 is totally justified!!! Not bloody likely.

BBS-LM

3,972 posts

225 months

Friday 21st January 2011
quotequote all
Douglas Arfempty said:
BMW M Coupe anyone?
hehe

Fury1630

393 posts

228 months

Friday 21st January 2011
quotequote all
Diesel next hehehehehehehehehehehe

The Black Flash

13,735 posts

199 months

Friday 21st January 2011
quotequote all
I'm gonna buck the trend and say I think it looks horrible from the side. The long bonnet and steep rear doesn't work for me at all.

anonymous-user

55 months

Friday 21st January 2011
quotequote all
4wd??? why??? Now their rich and talentless customers will just be going 50mph faster when they finally bin it............ ;-)

Harry Monk

5,187 posts

238 months

Friday 21st January 2011
quotequote all
bremb0 said:
Dagnut said:
bremb0 said:


Did you even read the article?
Yes, why?

"Although the Pininfarina-designed body appears to have come from a brief that called for the adding of BMW M coupe and Reliant Scimitar genes into the Ferrari mix, and although the new 4x4 drivertrain is rather a departure from the norm, the FF sticks to its knitting with a V12 powerplant up front."

It's pretty much nigh on identical to the beemer.

I personally wouldn't buy it if I was looking at a ferrari.



Edited by bremb0 on Friday 21st January 12:08
You got the wrong M-Coupe. HTH.

george h

14,707 posts

165 months

Friday 21st January 2011
quotequote all
Looks like a hearse to me.

spurs-442

2,750 posts

185 months

Friday 21st January 2011
quotequote all
The Black Flash said:
I'm gonna buck the trend and say I think it looks horrible from the side. The long bonnet and steep rear doesn't work for me at all.
+1 I'm not a fan of that shape either.

KevSeymour

773 posts

174 months

Friday 21st January 2011
quotequote all
I quite like this, and i don't think comparing it to the M Coupe is necessarily a bad thing either because i like the side profile of that too.

RenesisEvo

3,613 posts

220 months

Friday 21st January 2011
quotequote all
ChipsAndCheese said:
I immediately thought of the first Z3 based M Coupe, not the more recent Z4 M Coupe.



Edited by ChipsAndCheese on Friday 21st January 12:05
Me too.

My biggest issue is the dry weight of 1780kg - that's a seriosuly obese car.

Edited by RenesisEvo on Friday 21st January 12:20