whats the general opinion of falken tyres?

whats the general opinion of falken tyres?

Author
Discussion

caymanred

Original Poster:

714 posts

182 months

Wednesday 23rd February 2011
quotequote all
as above guys, considering getting them on my cayman.


cheers

anonymous-user

55 months

Wednesday 23rd February 2011
quotequote all
People on here seem to really rate them, but on my Jaguar X300 (Ziex ZE512) and classic mini (Ziex 912?) they were utter st when it was wet. They were bad enough that I took the nearly new set off the Mini and threw them in the bin.

On the Jaguar they were actually a bit scary - once you lost traction at the back (and that wasn't hard) it was like driving a bar of soap - the Vredestein tyres that replaced them were massively superior, as was every other tyre I ever fitted to it. From my experience I would actually classify them as ditchfinders. In the dry I suppose they were ok, but not great by any means.

Dave

RLK500

917 posts

253 months

Wednesday 23rd February 2011
quotequote all
I have them on my e30 m3. They are a decent budget tyre offering good wear and good levels of grip. They are not super grippy, but you get plenty of notice when they have had enough. As a road tyre, the overheat fairly quickly on track, on a warm day around the ring (which is not particularly hard on tyres, in comparison to say Brands Indy) they are letting you know that they need a break after a quickish lap. They tend to be pretty sensitive to pressures (or so I have found). All round a good tyre, just accept that they are not in the same league as the more expensive Pirelli, Michelin, Yoko's etc.

HTH

Asterix

24,438 posts

229 months

Wednesday 23rd February 2011
quotequote all
Can't see why you'd want to move away from Mich PS2s.

rb5230

11,657 posts

173 months

Wednesday 23rd February 2011
quotequote all
Asterix said:
Can't see why you'd want to move away from Mich PS2s.
Twice the price? fk452`s are decent, the fk 912`s woeful.

I prefer toyo T1R`s though.

Mr Whippy

29,055 posts

242 months

Wednesday 23rd February 2011
quotequote all
FK452 wore funny here.

If I ran them at higher pressure as per OEM, then they wore loads in the middle of the tread, so I had to lower them down and even then they went bald in the middle really early.

Outsides also wore off lots on shoulder of tyres.


My Eagle F1's Asym run 1psi under OEM pressures (vs 3psi for the FK452), and wear much flatter which gives more life right off. My fronts after a year look fine for another two years... the FK452 were worn away on the inner edge after 1yr.

If I ran higher pressures on the Falken the car was skittish AND they would clearly wear even more worse in the centres and thus reduce lifetime.

Narrower tyres overall, so not much rim protection.


THAT said, if you view the cheapness then you just have cheaper tyres you replace more often.


I'd not have them again though I don't think, just feel a bit false economy.

Dave

Zippee

13,473 posts

235 months

Wednesday 23rd February 2011
quotequote all
I used to run them on my TVRs, now switched to BF Goodrich G-force profilers and they seem to be superior. Not a huge amount of difference in the dry but in the wet they're leagues ahead of the Falkens.

V88Dicky

7,305 posts

184 months

Wednesday 23rd February 2011
quotequote all
I can only speak for the 452s, but they've been absolutely fine over the last 2.5 years and 10k miles on my Monaro. Much better than the OEM Potenza RE040s that it came with.

caymanred

Original Poster:

714 posts

182 months

Wednesday 23rd February 2011
quotequote all
thanks for the replies guys


the only reason i've been looking at these is because ill be selling the car in the next 3-4 months, and dont really want to shell out 600quid for pilot sports.....

is that a worthy reason or pointless?

205alive

6,087 posts

177 months

Wednesday 23rd February 2011
quotequote all
Nothing wrong with them in our experience (MR2 MK3) but on a heavier car? Don't know.

GreigM

6,728 posts

250 months

Wednesday 23rd February 2011
quotequote all
caymanred said:
thanks for the replies guys


the only reason i've been looking at these is because ill be selling the car in the next 3-4 months, and dont really want to shell out 600quid for pilot sports.....

is that a worthy reason or pointless?
I'd say thats a bad decision - many porsche buyers will be looking for N-rated tyres and I'd say that you'll potentially lose more money than you save by people negotiating down the price based on non-approved tyres.

If you were keeping it I'd say the opposite - don't get sucked into the N-rated hype and chose the tyres based on what is best for your driving style....

robsco

7,833 posts

177 months

Wednesday 23rd February 2011
quotequote all
I had 452s on the 156 and they were absolutely fine, good value for money.

caymanred

Original Poster:

714 posts

182 months

Wednesday 23rd February 2011
quotequote all
GreigM said:
I'd say thats a bad decision - many porsche buyers will be looking for N-rated tyres and I'd say that you'll potentially lose more money than you save by people negotiating down the price based on non-approved tyres.

If you were keeping it I'd say the opposite - don't get sucked into the N-rated hype and chose the tyres based on what is best for your driving style....
that was my worry......

any idea on Vredestein? seem cheap too

Mr Whippy

29,055 posts

242 months

Wednesday 23rd February 2011
quotequote all
GreigM said:
I'd say thats a bad decision - many porsche buyers will be looking for N-rated tyres and I'd say that you'll potentially lose more money than you save by people negotiating down the price based on non-approved tyres.

If you were keeping it I'd say the opposite - don't get sucked into the N-rated hype and chose the tyres based on what is best for your driving style....
Yep, I'd either get the 'right' tyres, otherwise a potential buyer might just see new tyres as adding expense to the car for items they don't want on it.

If I went to look at a car with brand new cheap tyres, it wouldn't be a selling point, it'd make me think the owner wanted £500 more for the car and I'd have to go spend more money getting the tyres I wanted on it.

Others may vary though...

Dave

v8will

3,301 posts

197 months

Wednesday 23rd February 2011
quotequote all
Falken are a budget performance tyre. Maybe for a MX-5 or MR2, not for Porsche IMHO

I'd walk away from a Porsche not fitted with the correct N-rated tyres unless it was very very cheap. It's not that the car will fall off the road or the world will end etc. It just shouts 'done on the cheap'

caymanred

Original Poster:

714 posts

182 months

Wednesday 23rd February 2011
quotequote all
cheers guys, looks like im back on the michelin ps' then!


FamilyDub

3,587 posts

166 months

Wednesday 23rd February 2011
quotequote all
FK452 are good, but Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta's are comparable in price, but much better performing.

zetec

4,468 posts

252 months

Wednesday 23rd February 2011
quotequote all
The FK452 seem to be the choice with the Focus ST owners club, I shall be trying them on mine when new boots are needed.

garrykiller

5,670 posts

159 months

Wednesday 23rd February 2011
quotequote all
Can't really compare but I have falkens on my mx5 and they are fantastic. Stick like glue!

GreigM

6,728 posts

250 months

Wednesday 23rd February 2011
quotequote all
caymanred said:
cheers guys, looks like im back on the michelin ps' then!
If its just 2 I don't think you've much choice - mixing brands isn't "approved" either