Bristol Cars goes into administration

Bristol Cars goes into administration

Author
Discussion

DonkeyApple

55,364 posts

170 months

Thursday 31st March 2011
quotequote all
Ozzie Osmond said:
Sounds like a perfect "investment opportunity" for you. Get in there!
No money to be made there unless you are a multinational.

If you don't relaunch the brand on a global basis then you are just going to sink millions into a cash hungry hobby.

Unless you take the whole thing down market, but even then it's best left to an engineering outfit who already produce cars.

You could throw a couple of bar in to get the remnants and easily sink another 10 and have nothing to show unless you can get economies of scale from being an existing producer.

skwdenyer

16,512 posts

241 months

Thursday 31st March 2011
quotequote all
DonkeyApple said:
No money to be made there unless you are a multinational.

If you don't relaunch the brand on a global basis then you are just going to sink millions into a cash hungry hobby.

Unless you take the whole thing down market, but even then it's best left to an engineering outfit who already produce cars.

You could throw a couple of bar in to get the remnants and easily sink another 10 and have nothing to show unless you can get economies of scale from being an existing producer.
I'm wondering if it could be a good fit with Antanov and his other current interests.

DonkeyApple

55,364 posts

170 months

Thursday 31st March 2011
quotequote all
skwdenyer said:
I'm wondering if it could be a good fit with Antanov and his other current interests.
If that's the chap who just funded the Spyker purchase then you'd think if they had plans for a big luxury car they would have a look.

In a way, I hope it's not picked up by an enthusiast who wants to keep it as was but by a British venture with plans to sell an uber barge into foreign parts. They can still run a heritage arm if required.

I see it as a bit of an opportunity to continue the small roll that the British car industry seems to be on.

cymtriks

4,560 posts

246 months

Thursday 31st March 2011
quotequote all
tog said:
g3org3y said:
JohnnyRims said:


This is from a 2007 model according to Google. Not really any different?

Might be alright on a £30k car, but for £250k.....
Compared to:







And I'm supposed to be impressed with the Bristol?
I'd still have the Bristol.
Seconded. The other interiors scream "Bling!" and two of the three are very dodgy taste aswell bordering on the chavtastic.

Trommel

19,129 posts

260 months

Friday 1st April 2011
quotequote all
Xinjiang No.1 Tractor Company.

scratchchin



Vario-Rob

3,034 posts

249 months

Friday 1st April 2011
quotequote all
Trommel said:
Xinjiang No.1 Tractor Company.

scratchchin
Interesting development Trom it must be said, lets hope they don’t try and turn Bristol into something I gather is known as a ‘brand’

Pesty

42,655 posts

257 months

Friday 1st April 2011
quotequote all
Regarding the four pics of the interiors.

I like all four. they all look like nice places to be to me.

I like the switches on the fighter center console They remind me of high end home audio like Naim.

also they have dials in the roof like a plane so they get extra points for that in my book too.

Looks better in this pic i think



Edited by Pesty on Friday 1st April 23:20

anonymous-user

55 months

Saturday 2nd April 2011
quotequote all
Bristol have always had a thing for grouping the dials in an odd way. I often wonder why copywriters and journos refer to cars having "aircraft style" cockpits, as they rarely resemble aircraft that much, unless "aircraft style" means "locks of clocks" (in a modern airliner, you get a few flat screens and a few redundant clocks).

Ozzie Osmond

21,189 posts

247 months

Saturday 2nd April 2011
quotequote all
Breadvan73 said:
Bristol have always had a thing for grouping the dials in an odd way.
I'm afraid that's another of the features which ranks the cars IMO firmly among the Emperor's New Clothes.

If any major manufacturer tried the same thing they'd be laughed out of court. As it happens, that seems to be what's now happening to Bristol. Sad in some ways to see them go but at the end of the day they couldn't fool enough people enough of the time - and certainly not at that price.

skwdenyer

16,512 posts

241 months

Saturday 2nd April 2011
quotequote all
Vario-Rob said:
Trommel said:
Xinjiang No.1 Tractor Company.

scratchchin
Interesting development Trom it must be said, lets hope they don’t try and turn Bristol into something I gather is known as a ‘brand’
Even for the Chinese, this moves strikes me as wildly optimistic! Since the Administrators appear to be denying the sale, it is also rather strange. Almost as incredible as the other story yesterday, which had it that Morgan had bought Bristol and were planning a 3-wheeled Blenheim...

will_

6,027 posts

204 months

Sunday 3rd April 2011
quotequote all
The orange Fighter was out and about in SW London yesterday. First one I've seen, and it's an interesting thing....

Twincam16

27,646 posts

259 months

Sunday 10th April 2011
quotequote all
Vario-Rob said:
Trommel said:
Xinjiang No.1 Tractor Company.

scratchchin
Interesting development Trom it must be said, lets hope they don’t try and turn Bristol into something I gather is known as a ‘brand’
Quite. Can't see it turning into Aston Martin though. In some ways Bristol is what Aston Martin would have become if they'd never released the DB7.

Lost soul

8,712 posts

183 months

Sunday 10th April 2011
quotequote all
Twincam16 said:
Quite. Can't see it turning into Aston Martin though. In some ways Bristol is what Aston Martin would have become if they'd never released the DB7.
You mean if Aston failed

Dr Jekyll

23,820 posts

262 months

Sunday 10th April 2011
quotequote all
According to Christopher Balfour's book Bristol was approached in the 90s to make a "200MPH supercar for another manufacturer".

Any ideas who this could have been?

skwdenyer

16,512 posts

241 months

Sunday 10th April 2011
quotequote all
Dr Jekyll said:
According to Christopher Balfour's book Bristol was approached in the 90s to make a "200MPH supercar for another manufacturer".

Any ideas who this could have been?
To make as in design? Or to make as in construct? Bristol's facilities and experience with sheet alloy work would have made them quite a good potential contract costructor for somebody.

tog

4,545 posts

229 months

Sunday 10th April 2011
quotequote all
Dr Jekyll said:
According to Christopher Balfour's book Bristol was approached in the 90s to make a "200MPH supercar for another manufacturer".

Any ideas who this could have been?
I've heard it claimed that Chrysler asked them to look into building a production version of the Chronos concept car. Would have been badged a Bristol-Chrysler (or possibly a Chrysler-Bristol), and apparently came quite close to happening until the Daimler merger killed it.


EDLT

15,421 posts

207 months

Monday 11th April 2011
quotequote all
Well it is hideous enough for Bristol to be involved.

MrDarkBlack

3,891 posts

177 months

Saturday 16th April 2011
quotequote all
EDLT said:
Well it is hideous enough for Bristol to be involved.
Stop mincing your thoughts. hehe

marcosgt

11,021 posts

177 months

Saturday 16th April 2011
quotequote all
I'd disagree - Much nicer looking than most of what Bristol have made in recent decades.

Would've been quite something to see a real top end car from a major US manufacturer (as in, using their name, rather than owning some other brand).

Would probably have done wonders for Bristol's image too, although as I don't "get" Bristol I must be wrong wink

M.

ZeeTacoe

5,444 posts

223 months

Saturday 16th April 2011
quotequote all
what would Bristol have that Chrysler didn't? Its not as if Chrysler hadn't built and designed 2 generations of fast and massive engined cars by 1998.