RE: Driven: Ferrari FF

Author
Discussion

DeltaEvo2

870 posts

193 months

Friday 25th March 2011
quotequote all
AWESOME CAR, beautiful, the side view and the front are so menacing. Brava Ferrari! smile

P9UNK

120 posts

159 months

Saturday 26th March 2011
quotequote all
TomTVR500 said:
I hate to admit it but so often these days i find myself respecting the engineering behind the car and reading about it with a serious expression on my face quietly nodding to myself at all the technical advancements INSTEAD of reading about it with goosebumps smiling to myself feeling excitied at the thought of one day driving one.

I find it incresingly difficult to get excited by modern Supercars and it's a sad admition frown

Great car Ferrari, not exciting. In my opinion of course.
I agree with you, while I respect Ferrari for their history and their pursuit of speed and excitement I'm not excited by something I will never get a chance to drive. Like being 34 and having a poster of Angelina Jolie on your bedroom wall. And stunning...not really, steering wheel looks dreadful, it is what you would expect from a premium brand but no more. If it was a McLaren or Aston the keyboard assassins would be out in numbers.

Der Wachauring

14 posts

158 months

Saturday 26th March 2011
quotequote all
Please Ferrari, return to making cars that look like this:



Please.

Pretty please.

mcdk2

137 posts

233 months

Saturday 26th March 2011
quotequote all
So lets get this straight. This is a Ferrari with poor steering feel and such strong nanny protection that it's virtually impossible to get it to drift - even on snow! Really whats the point in having all that power if you are always prevented from exploring the limits of grip (and exceeding them on occasion!)? For speed just get a bike - thats what bikes are best at. 4x4 should be the reserve of farmers and dudes who offroad.

All I see here is a penis extension - a pretty and beautifully engineered penis extension.

I can't claim to have driven anything as fancy as this so maybe I'm missing something?

jbforce10

509 posts

176 months

Saturday 26th March 2011
quotequote all
mcdk2 said:
So lets get this straight. This is a Ferrari with poor steering feel and such strong nanny protection that it's virtually impossible to get it to drift - even on snow! Really whats the point in having all that power if you are always prevented from exploring the limits of grip (and exceeding them on occasion!)? For speed just get a bike - thats what bikes are best at. 4x4 should be the reserve of farmers and dudes who offroad.

All I see here is a penis extension - a pretty and beautifully engineered penis extension.

I can't claim to have driven anything as fancy as this so maybe I'm missing something?
Missing something? Possibly. The "poor steering feel" you mention (which in the actual review is described as "a little disappointing perhaps....... In terms of accuracy and sharpness it can't be faulted" so isn't exactly "poor") is in comparison to modern, mid-engined performance cars. Compare it to what 99% of us drive I assume that it feels pretty precise.
The point of having all that power is not to get the back-end out (regardless of what characteristics TopGear rate a car against), it's painfully obvious that the FF is not aimed towards the drifter/track-day/"limits-of-grip" drivers in any way. The only people that will be driving an FF in that way will be reviewers, not customers. I couldn't imagine many (or even any) FF owners taking it to a track weekend instead of the more nimble mid-engine weekend car they no-doubt have in climate-controlled garage number 2.

The FF is a big, heavy executive GT for the financial elite to enjoy. If I were fortunate enough to be in that sector then I'm fairly sure I'd already be on the waiting list and would have a space reserved for it beside a Delta S4 and 037 Stradale. As it stands now, I'll just keep crossing my fingers on Lotto nights.

Like many, I was very surprised when the FF was announced. I think it's great. It looks different and very menacing, it has the grunt and traction to back-up its looks and, as with all Ferraris, it's priced such as to maintain their company prestige. They know exactly what they're doing.

Jonathan Legard

5,187 posts

238 months

Saturday 26th March 2011
quotequote all
jbforce10 said:
Missing something? Possibly. The "poor steering feel" you mention (which in the actual review is described as "a little disappointing perhaps....... In terms of accuracy and sharpness it can't be faulted" so isn't exactly "poor") is in comparison to modern, mid-engined performance cars. Compare it to what 99% of us drive I assume that it feels pretty precise.
The point of having all that power is not to get the back-end out (regardless of what characteristics TopGear rate a car against), it's painfully obvious that the FF is not aimed towards the drifter/track-day/"limits-of-grip" drivers in any way. The only people that will be driving an FF in that way will be reviewers, not customers. I couldn't imagine many (or even any) FF owners taking it to a track weekend instead of the more nimble mid-engine weekend car they no-doubt have in climate-controlled garage number 2.

The FF is a big, heavy executive GT for the financial elite to enjoy. If I were fortunate enough to be in that sector then I'm fairly sure I'd already be on the waiting list and would have a space reserved for it beside a Delta S4 and 037 Stradale. As it stands now, I'll just keep crossing my fingers on Lotto nights.

Like many, I was very surprised when the FF was announced. I think it's great. It looks different and very menacing, it has the grunt and traction to back-up its looks and, as with all Ferraris, it's priced such as to maintain their company prestige. They know exactly what they're doing.
At last. Someone who gets it.

mcdk2

137 posts

233 months

Saturday 26th March 2011
quotequote all
jbforce10 said:
mcdk2 said:
So lets get this straight. This is a Ferrari with poor steering feel and such strong nanny protection that it's virtually impossible to get it to drift - even on snow! Really whats the point in having all that power if you are always prevented from exploring the limits of grip (and exceeding them on occasion!)? For speed just get a bike - thats what bikes are best at. 4x4 should be the reserve of farmers and dudes who offroad.

All I see here is a penis extension - a pretty and beautifully engineered penis extension.

I can't claim to have driven anything as fancy as this so maybe I'm missing something?
Missing something? Possibly. The "poor steering feel" you mention (which in the actual review is described as "a little disappointing perhaps....... In terms of accuracy and sharpness it can't be faulted" so isn't exactly "poor") is in comparison to modern, mid-engined performance cars. Compare it to what 99% of us drive I assume that it feels pretty precise.
The point of having all that power is not to get the back-end out (regardless of what characteristics TopGear rate a car against), it's painfully obvious that the FF is not aimed towards the drifter/track-day/"limits-of-grip" drivers in any way. The only people that will be driving an FF in that way will be reviewers, not customers. I couldn't imagine many (or even any) FF owners taking it to a track weekend instead of the more nimble mid-engine weekend car they no-doubt have in climate-controlled garage number 2.

The FF is a big, heavy executive GT for the financial elite to enjoy. If I were fortunate enough to be in that sector then I'm fairly sure I'd already be on the waiting list and would have a space reserved for it beside a Delta S4 and 037 Stradale. As it stands now, I'll just keep crossing my fingers on Lotto nights.

Like many, I was very surprised when the FF was announced. I think it's great. It looks different and very menacing, it has the grunt and traction to back-up its looks and, as with all Ferraris, it's priced such as to maintain their company prestige. They know exactly what they're doing.
My use of the word drift is probably inappropriate. I know it isn't a drifter race car! I am wondering how satisfying it would be to own when the systems and 4x4 prevent you from exploring the limits - even occasionally on a tight bend at low speed. If the thrill of all that power comes from straight line speed/accererlation, a 10k bike will always make it seem tame. I'm sure the sound is amazing though. The steering feel/feedback should be perfect on a car like this, not just accurate and sharp.
Do you think that ownership of such a car would be all about showing off or to remind yourself of your financial success in life ie to boost self esteem? If I owned it I would love oggling it from an aesthetic and engineering design point of view. Car shows provide that for me.
For me it doesn't have the purity that a Ferrari should have.

jbforce10

509 posts

176 months

Saturday 26th March 2011
quotequote all
True, but Ferrari 4-seaters (and 4-seaters on the whole) are designed to accommodate 4 people and a bit of luggage. By doing so, optimum performance/handling/balance is already compromised compared to a mid-engined 2-seater. I guess "compromise" would be a bitter pill for me to swallow with an FF costing over £200k, but the majority of FF customers won't be people who have just about saved/borrowed enough to get one. If they're into track days / racing they'll have a focused sports car too and would consider the FF to be the closest performance that they can get to their sports car with the additional benefit of luxury/accommodation/prestige/refinement.

You're right though, bang for the buck a bike is the option for performance. Not sure how many company fat-cats could squeeze themselves into a set of leathers though wink

Edited by jbforce10 on Saturday 26th March 11:57

theholygrail

261 posts

169 months

Saturday 26th March 2011
quotequote all
Absolutely love the looks of this. But then I'm hoping my next car will be a BMW Z3MC so I guess it's in a similar vein. Can't stop looking at that side profile shot. I WANT my supercars to be a bit wacky (not like the new Mclaren. Good though I'm sure it is) and this strikes just the right balance. Not since the Sagaris/T360 have I lusted after a car's looks so much!

theholygrail

261 posts

169 months

Saturday 26th March 2011
quotequote all
Sorry, I meant T350!! Shows how long it is since I've seen one redface(

soad

32,912 posts

177 months

Saturday 26th March 2011
quotequote all
Der Wachauring said:
Please Ferrari, return to making cars that look like this:



Please.

Pretty please.
cloud9

Globs

13,841 posts

232 months

Saturday 26th March 2011
quotequote all
mcelliott said:


I love the side shot. Brooding menace. My new favourite car.
That's one way of making the Panamera look good I guess.

S Works

10,166 posts

251 months

Sunday 27th March 2011
quotequote all
Yuk! Ferrari have gone down in my estimation with this. Fugly car, odd proportions that are completely *out* in the same vein as the Panamera. Another pointless, minging car for people with more money than sense.

Globs

13,841 posts

232 months

Sunday 27th March 2011
quotequote all
S Works said:
Another pointless, minging car for people with more money than sense.
That's a big market segment though isn't it?

PiB

1,199 posts

271 months

Sunday 27th March 2011
quotequote all
This car (I'll hand it that) is an oddity! It is far from attractive. Has an odd 4x4 design, oh yeah it saves weight or something? Probably some new expensive consumables related to the drivetrain now. I can't imagine people willing to hunch on there way into the back seats. Will they put all season tires on it or will the owners simply notify their Ferrari man they need a set of snows? Z rated tires won't work at all in snow with the widths on this car. The reason I would buy this car is merely for it's irrelevant design - it's oddness. And it really is CR*P.

I'll watch some video reviews and wait to see one in person - maybe my mind will change.

Globs

13,841 posts

232 months

Sunday 27th March 2011
quotequote all
PiB said:
This car (I'll hand it that) is an oddity! It is far from attractive. Has an odd 4x4 design, oh yeah it saves weight or something? Probably some new expensive consumables related to the drivetrain now. I can't imagine people willing to hunch on there way into the back seats. Will they put all season tires on it or will the owners simply notify their Ferrari man they need a set of snows? Z rated tires won't work at all in snow with the widths on this car. The reason I would buy this car is merely for it's irrelevant design - it's oddness. And it really is CR*P.

I'll watch some video reviews and wait to see one in person - maybe my mind will change.
I don't understand why people would buy this when there are plenty of good Maseratis about that do it much better.

TheOrangePeril

778 posts

181 months

Sunday 27th March 2011
quotequote all
Fantastic article, but "control logarithms" - REALLY!?

Proof-reader, please.

p.s. I <3 FF

TomTVR500

254 posts

162 months

Sunday 27th March 2011
quotequote all
theholygrail said:
Sorry, I meant T350!! Shows how long it is since I've seen one redface(
Now there is an STUNNING bit of automotive art!

Chris-R

756 posts

188 months

Monday 28th March 2011
quotequote all
TheOrangePeril said:
Fantastic article, but "control logarithms" - REALLY!?

Proof-reader, please.

p.s. I <3 FF
We don't have a proof reader, but at 2am when I wrote that I might have been slightly 'over-proof' myself... smile

MrCarCoach

337 posts

158 months

Monday 28th March 2011
quotequote all
Personally its not the Ferrari for me, perhaps i'm old fashioned even though i'm still young (under 30!!), but to me Ferrari's should all have a clear racing pedigree within them, they should be sports cars for the road but cars that have a clear racing lineage none the less.

If you are an Oligarch that wishes to take a flash car with you to Verbier then this will fit the bill perfectly but for anyone else a Range Rover would suffice shortly?!

I miss the Ferrari of old and for me some of the mystic of the brand has been lost what with the launch of Ferrari World in Dubai, the California and now this. I appreciate Ferrari are only a business giving the market what they apparently want, but its this type of "market" that seem to be dictating the future direction of the brand that worries me. I just wish they could have kept something back, I mean why should a Ferrari even try to be all things to all men/woman (4 seats, 4 wheel drive, room for golf clubs etc)?!

Regards,

The old fashioned traditionalist.