RE: Porsche Panamera Turbo S Revealed

RE: Porsche Panamera Turbo S Revealed

Author
Discussion

epom

11,550 posts

162 months

Wednesday 30th March 2011
quotequote all
my god that thing looks absolutely huge in those pics !!

angusc43

11,498 posts

209 months

Wednesday 30th March 2011
quotequote all
Hellbound said:
I agree. Great car for such a bulging monstrosity.
Made me laugh out loud :-)

Hellbound

2,500 posts

177 months

Wednesday 30th March 2011
quotequote all
Rawwr said:
Garlick said:
Panamera please.
I love you. We should try and make kids.
Finally, a potentially uglier sight than the Panamera smile


No offense intended!

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

256 months

Wednesday 30th March 2011
quotequote all
Rawwr said:
Garlick said:
Panamera please.
I love you. We should try and make kids.
Make kids do what..?

Rawwr

22,722 posts

235 months

Wednesday 30th March 2011
quotequote all
mybrainhurts said:
Make kids do what..?
Understand why the Panamera really is fantastic.

cathalm

606 posts

245 months

Wednesday 30th March 2011
quotequote all
kambites said:
It's a two and a bit tonne car; it being "a little numb, a little leaden" is quite an impressive feat, really. I'm sure it still drives a damned slight better than anything else in the market.
And yet it lost it's launch test comparisons as a drivers car to both the Quattroporte and Rapide. Lets not let Porsche fanboyism through the door.

kambites

67,593 posts

222 months

Wednesday 30th March 2011
quotequote all
Rawwr said:
Understand why the Panamera really is fantastic.
I think blinding innocent children just for the sake of a car is a bit off. hehe

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

256 months

Wednesday 30th March 2011
quotequote all
toppstuff said:
The Panamera is in a class of one , really. It is no effective competitor,
You're right, of course...

I can't think of any other car that looks like a cross between an Easter egg and a turd...

cathalm

606 posts

245 months

Wednesday 30th March 2011
quotequote all
toppstuff said:
cathalm said:
Sorry I have to take you to task on that. That simply isn't true, i imagine you have never been near a Rapide let alone sat in one if that's what you think.
Yes it is true and yes I have travelled in the back of a Rapide. Its like sitting inside my wifes handbag. Its a cramped, leather lined pocket that you have to contort yourself into. There is little view forward. Its awful. I was wishing the journey would end as quickly as possible.

Are you perhaps a little fella? Only a little fella would be happy in the back of a Rapide. You need a Panamera to take your mates ( assuming they are regular anglo-saxon sized blokes) on a road trip to Le Mans or the Cote d'Azur, for which purpose there is no better car.
Er, no, I'm 6 foot, he's a bit bigger. I did say it was claustrophobic, just pointing out that it's not correct to say that you can't fit in because you can. The view out is very restricted. a panamera would be more comfy for a trip to lemans for sure. O

kambites

67,593 posts

222 months

Wednesday 30th March 2011
quotequote all
cathalm said:
And yet it lost it's launch test comparisons as a drivers car to both the Quattroporte and Rapide. Lets not let Porsche fanboyism through the door.
Interesting. The reviews I'd read when it first appeared said it was best in its class from a handling point of view, but still poor for a Porsche. Not sure which reviews they were not, though, now. Certainly Evo agree with you (although that was comparing it to the QP and XFR not the Rapide). I think the review I read was of the 2WD car, which might make a difference I suppose?

Jagdave

14 posts

159 months

Wednesday 30th March 2011
quotequote all
Okay Jaguar, time to step up with a real XJR. Grace, Space and Pace aplenty................

Beefmeister

16,482 posts

231 months

Wednesday 30th March 2011
quotequote all
Jagdave said:
Okay Jaguar, time to step up with a real XJR. Grace, Space and Pace aplenty................
Drive an XJ Supersports.

Stunningly fast and capable, and I think much prettier than the Panamera, as much as I like it.



It's a proper 4/5 seater, and does the job of the Panam/Rapide for much less money.

Kazlet

278 posts

172 months

Wednesday 30th March 2011
quotequote all
Yep, turd on wheels.

Johnpidge

588 posts

190 months

Wednesday 30th March 2011
quotequote all
still fking uglyvomit

marcosgt

11,021 posts

177 months

Wednesday 30th March 2011
quotequote all
You get used to anything (I'm old enough to remember the widespread shock the Sierra produced!), but driving past a Porsche dealer in Ferndown on Saturday it's an unescapable truth that the Panamera is no looker, even in the context of the Porsche range.

Most of the cars looked ok, whether you're a Porsche fan or not, but the Panameras (and it's fatboy brother) just look like a 12 year old had been let loose with their CAD/CAM system... Stretch dimensions 120%! Do it for height too on the 4WD! biggrin

Sure it's quick and roomy in the back, but I'd still rather drive a normal 911 or a get an XJ!

M.

toppstuff

13,698 posts

248 months

Wednesday 30th March 2011
quotequote all
Beefmeister said:
Drive an XJ Supersports.

Stunningly fast and capable, and I think much prettier than the Panamera, as much as I like it.



It's a proper 4/5 seater, and does the job of the Panam/Rapide for much less money.
Good call. Lovely car. Great value compared to the Porsche.

Stu R

21,410 posts

216 months

Wednesday 30th March 2011
quotequote all
More schnell can only be a good thing. The Panamera isn't the prettiest thing but my word it's good at what it does.

belleair302

6,847 posts

208 months

Wednesday 30th March 2011
quotequote all
Alpina B7 please.

6th Gear

3,563 posts

195 months

Wednesday 30th March 2011
quotequote all



Beefmeister

16,482 posts

231 months

Wednesday 30th March 2011
quotequote all
Jessica Alba naked please.



(just seeing if any request is granted with a pic)