What Hot Hatch for under £10k

What Hot Hatch for under £10k

Author
Discussion

oj121

Original Poster:

1,548 posts

172 months

Friday 22nd April 2011
quotequote all
I dont fit in an S2000. Dont like BMW at all and the Z4 is the ugliest of the lot.

Ill look at the elise but if i dont fit in an s2000 am i going to fit an elise. My legs are too long. I just about fit in our plod mobiles lol

oj121

Original Poster:

1,548 posts

172 months

Friday 22nd April 2011
quotequote all
geeteeaye said:
No real reason why an Impreza would cost particularly more than a Focus ST to run, had a Scoob for 4 years and cost less to run per year than the previous 306Gti-6 did, although this was a bulletproof 2.0 - do hear some horror stories about the 2.5's. Would be a more interesting choice than having another hot hatch on the drive, otherwise it would be the ITR or an Elise for me.
Does the Sub not require extra servicing? Thought it required stuff every 6k?

Boba Fret

438 posts

156 months

Friday 22nd April 2011
quotequote all
147 GTA.

Case closed.

danneth

994 posts

187 months

Friday 22nd April 2011
quotequote all
Marf said:
The chassis is basically a Ford Focus, make of that what you will in terms of its cornering ability vs an ST.

As for boring looks, yes, the early models are less in your face than the later ones. This did change with the 06 model which got a fair bit more agressive.
from what ive seen in person the ST and the mps are way apart in terms of performance both in a line and cornering


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SdoOTmGnOC0

only has a different intake, uprated pads and brake lines seems to go round corners ok to me wink

Marf

22,907 posts

241 months

Friday 22nd April 2011
quotequote all
oj121 said:
geeteeaye said:
No real reason why an Impreza would cost particularly more than a Focus ST to run, had a Scoob for 4 years and cost less to run per year than the previous 306Gti-6 did, although this was a bulletproof 2.0 - do hear some horror stories about the 2.5's. Would be a more interesting choice than having another hot hatch on the drive, otherwise it would be the ITR or an Elise for me.
Does the Sub not require extra servicing? Thought it required stuff every 6k?
http://www.subaru4you.co.uk/service/servicesched1.shtml

Newage 2001-  
A Service 10,000m or 12 Months £123
B Service 20/40,000m or 24 Months £173 (4)
C Service 30,000m or 36 Months £335 (2) (5)
D Service 50,000m or 60 Months £289 A+Cam
E Service 60,000m or 72 Months £359 B+C (1) (4) (5)
Service Order: A B C B D E A B C D

Marf

22,907 posts

241 months

Friday 22nd April 2011
quotequote all
danneth said:
Marf said:
The chassis is basically a Ford Focus, make of that what you will in terms of its cornering ability vs an ST.

As for boring looks, yes, the early models are less in your face than the later ones. This did change with the 06 model which got a fair bit more agressive.
from what ive seen in person the ST and the mps are way apart in terms of performance both in a line and cornering


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SdoOTmGnOC0

only has a different intake, uprated pads and brake lines seems to go round corners ok to me wink
You don't need to convince me, if my money were going on a modern hot hatch it'd be the MPS every time. smile

danneth

994 posts

187 months

Friday 22nd April 2011
quotequote all
Boba Fret said:
147 GTA.

Case closed.
i think he might be after just abit of performance wink

Wadeski

8,158 posts

213 months

Friday 22nd April 2011
quotequote all
I cant imagine you would have problems fitting in a Boxster, S2000 or 350z.

oj121

Original Poster:

1,548 posts

172 months

Friday 22nd April 2011
quotequote all
My cousin had an s2000 and i couldnt turn the wheel as my legs were rubbing on the bottom. Was very cramped and couldnt get into a position to drive comforatbly.

Didnt realise the 'Roo servicing was like that. Always thought they were high maintenance or have i just confused them with the older models and the evo's?

Marf

22,907 posts

241 months

Friday 22nd April 2011
quotequote all
oj121 said:
Didnt realise the 'Roo servicing was like that. Always thought they were high maintenance or have i just confused them with the older models and the evo's?
The earlier models did have more frequent servicing, check the link, its all there smile

oj121

Original Poster:

1,548 posts

172 months

Friday 22nd April 2011
quotequote all
Id like to narrow it down to maybe 3 hot hatches and a wildcard so i can get the test driven before I go away in August and pick something u in sept when i get back.

Boba Fret

438 posts

156 months

Friday 22nd April 2011
quotequote all
danneth said:
i think he might be after just abit of performance wink
riiiiiiiiiight.

and of course a 3.2l 250hp V6 in a small 3 door hatch doesn't have any performance. Silly me.rolleyes

robsco

7,829 posts

176 months

Friday 22nd April 2011
quotequote all
Boba Fret said:
147 GTA.

Case closed.
Job done.

slomax

6,657 posts

192 months

Friday 22nd April 2011
quotequote all
you've missed the obvious 205GTI. should get a mint and fettled one for your money. show it the right road and you will have way more fun than anything else. long distance touring will be a thing of the past because you will go the "scenic route".

Tom H

543 posts

187 months

Friday 22nd April 2011
quotequote all
R32 Mk IV, great soundtrack and fun in corners and in straight lines







I enjoy mine

oj121

Original Poster:

1,548 posts

172 months

Friday 22nd April 2011
quotequote all
Im not really after a classic like a 205. It will be used back and for Wales a good 6 times a year (250 miles each way).

147.....you trying to kill me? I cant afford all those front tyres! and its foggy enough in Fenand to not need the smoke aswell. The Alfas are massively over engineered are they not? What are they like for running costs? Is its going to cripple me?

danneth

994 posts

187 months

Friday 22nd April 2011
quotequote all
Boba Fret said:
riiiiiiiiiight.

and of course a 3.2l 250hp V6 in a small 3 door hatch doesn't have any performance. Silly me.rolleyes
Sounds good on paper doesn't it wink

Think i seem to recall the Alfa been 3 seconds slower on top gear then the MPS FRS mk1 and a R32 biggrin

oj121

Original Poster:

1,548 posts

172 months

Friday 22nd April 2011
quotequote all
Yeah it was considerably slower iirc. Just smoke and noise.

oj121

Original Poster:

1,548 posts

172 months

Friday 22nd April 2011
quotequote all
How does the Megane R26 F1 stand up to these? I know they are rapid but do they fall aart and rattle like most French cars? Also not sure I can get my head around that rear!

Zoki

382 posts

213 months

Friday 22nd April 2011
quotequote all
Another vote for the MPS here.