991 GT3 RS Breaks Cover...

991 GT3 RS Breaks Cover...

Author
Discussion

Slickhillsy

Original Poster:

1,772 posts

144 months

Nimerino

295 posts

114 months

Saturday 13th December 2014
quotequote all
Looks pretty fantastic, and happy to see it's clearly differentiated from the regular GT3.

The mechanical specification will be interesting as well; one would imagine they've gone properly hardcore given the move to the wide body on the 991 GT3 and the extra cooling they've felt was required.

Magic919

14,126 posts

202 months

Saturday 13th December 2014
quotequote all
Those pics are in the RS thread.

GT3cs

1,200 posts

242 months

Saturday 13th December 2014
quotequote all
That article suggests the old 4.0l is going in . Surely that's wrong ?

Right off to try and bribe my OPC .

nightwalker

3,568 posts

188 months

Saturday 13th December 2014
quotequote all
If the 4.0 is to live on, what will that do to the crazy prices being asked for the 997 4.0?

RDMcG

19,192 posts

208 months

Saturday 13th December 2014
quotequote all
Article is not right. 4.0 is correct but it's not the Mezger. Based on the 3.8 of the 991 GT3 ( which is itself unrelated to the more complex 3.8 Mezger in the 997.2RS.

pete a

3,799 posts

185 months

Saturday 13th December 2014
quotequote all
RDMcG said:
Article is not right. 4.0 is correct but it's not the Mezger. Based on the 3.8 of the 991 GT3 ( which is based on the standard 3.8 dfi engine in the Carrea S.
Fixed that for you...

RDMcG

19,192 posts

208 months

Saturday 13th December 2014
quotequote all
pete a said:
Fixed that for you...
Yes..I stated it badly. Would have loved a Mezger ( I think), though I say this without knowing how the new engine will perform.

kbooker

728 posts

140 months

Saturday 13th December 2014
quotequote all
Is it me or does that look like a Cayman with a wing to anyone else? confused

Sandy59

2,706 posts

212 months

Saturday 13th December 2014
quotequote all
kbooker said:
Is it me or does that look like a Cayman with a wing to anyone else? confused
Not quite.
When the launch pictures are released I'm sure it'll look a lot more striking, and nothing like a Cayman.

kbooker

728 posts

140 months

Saturday 13th December 2014
quotequote all
Sandy59 said:
Not quite.
When the launch pictures are released I'm sure it'll look a lot more striking, and nothing like a Cayman.
Fingers crossed smile

jackal

11,248 posts

283 months

Saturday 13th December 2014
quotequote all
Will reserve judgement because in those pics it looks atrocious to my eyes.

Slippydiff

14,851 posts

224 months

Saturday 13th December 2014
quotequote all
jackal said:
Will reserve judgement because in those pics it looks atrocious to my eyes.
yes



vomitvomitvomitvomit

And leaving price aside (which I know some will find impossible ....), this is how it could/should be done .....



cloud9

Edited by Slippydiff on Saturday 13th December 17:49

Slickhillsy

Original Poster:

1,772 posts

144 months

Saturday 13th December 2014
quotequote all
+1. exactamondo! Love the Spec. In black - obviously not as much as my Scud though biggrin

Slippydiff

14,851 posts

224 months

Saturday 13th December 2014
quotequote all
Slickhillsy said:
+1. exactamondo! Love the Spec. In black - obviously not as much as my Scud though biggrin
Just need this for the full set now :

http://www.pistonheads.com/classifieds/used-cars/f...


biggrin

Nice Scud BTW smile

footsoldier

2,259 posts

193 months

Saturday 13th December 2014
quotequote all
jackal said:
Will reserve judgement because in those pics it looks atrocious to my eyes.
I've got my name down for one, but can't say the looks are doing much for me either. Shallow maybe, but it needs to feel good to look at as well as to drive!

jackal

11,248 posts

283 months

Sunday 14th December 2014
quotequote all
footsoldier said:
I've got my name down for one, but can't say the looks are doing much for me either. Shallow maybe, but it needs to feel good to look at as well as to drive!
Damm straight, with you 200% ... give me an F12 all day long .... Sex on a stick.