what is an 'early' 3.4 996?

what is an 'early' 3.4 996?

Author
Discussion

Hippea

1,802 posts

69 months

Sunday 24th March
quotequote all

hmg

562 posts

119 months

Sunday 24th March
quotequote all
Yep. That will find a home I’m sure. Just a shame it’s resale Silver..

BillyB

1,388 posts

258 months

Monday 25th March
quotequote all


Not "early" but 2002, £19k, 76k miles.

https://www.facebook.com/commerce/listing/81629017...

Edited by BillyB on Monday 25th March 12:56

RTPT

131 posts

19 months

Monday 25th March
quotequote all
BillyB said:
Hmm.. what's the common saying... "never buy a car from Birmingham" biggrin

ATM

18,289 posts

219 months

Monday 25th March
quotequote all
RTPT said:
BillyB said:
Hmm.. what's the common saying... "never buy a car from Birmingham" biggrin
I'd avoid Bradford and Oldham but not Birmingham.

Ed.Neumann

421 posts

8 months

Monday 25th March
quotequote all
Surely it depends where in Brum?

I have bought from Knowle, Dorridge and Edgbaston before, but wouldn't buy a car from Aston, Walsall etc.

However, I'm from Cambridgeshire so don't really know the area and base my views on what I hear.

Edgbaston probably has some of the roughest parts of Brum as it does the poshest? But we all judge based on what we hear on TV these days. Wrongly or rightly, who knows?

M3333

2,261 posts

214 months

Wednesday 27th March
quotequote all
Looks like it would be worthy of a viewing if you are local. Nice 98 3.4. Poorly detailed advert but that could be an advantage!

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/335320342798?mkcid=16&a...

Edited by M3333 on Wednesday 27th March 19:48

boxaw

39 posts

152 months

Thursday 28th March
quotequote all
It's a 2001 - flippin ebay.

It's mine and yes, ad is a little sparse but happy to answer any questions. It's not pristine but solid, reliable and (I think) very fairly priced given year, mileage and condition. I will miss it.

M3333 said:
Looks like it would be worthy of a viewing if you are local. Nice 98 3.4. Poorly detailed advert but that could be an advantage!

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/335320342798?mkcid=16&a...

Edited by M3333 on Wednesday 27th March 19:48

youngsyr

14,742 posts

192 months

Thursday 28th March
quotequote all
boxaw said:
It's a 2001 - flippin ebay.

It's mine and yes, ad is a little sparse but happy to answer any questions. It's not pristine but solid, reliable and (I think) very fairly priced given year, mileage and condition. I will miss it.

M3333 said:
Looks like it would be worthy of a viewing if you are local. Nice 98 3.4. Poorly detailed advert but that could be an advantage!

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/335320342798?mkcid=16&a...

Edited by M3333 on Wednesday 27th March 19:48
At least put details of the service history on there - it'll save you being asked umpteen times anyway.

Looks very clean. Are those wheels original - I think they're OEM but an option, not standard, yet they're not listed on the options list?

Fast Bug

11,692 posts

161 months

Thursday 28th March
quotequote all
youngsyr said:
At least put details of the service history on there - it'll save you being asked umpteen times anyway.

Looks very clean. Are those wheels original - I think they're OEM but an option, not standard, yet they're not listed on the options list?
The wheels are from a 997

HughG

3,548 posts

241 months

Thursday 28th March
quotequote all
Fast Bug said:
youngsyr said:
At least put details of the service history on there - it'll save you being asked umpteen times anyway.

Looks very clean. Are those wheels original - I think they're OEM but an option, not standard, yet they're not listed on the options list?
The wheels are from a 997
They look like the 996.2 5 spokes to me.

Orangecurry

7,428 posts

206 months

Thursday 28th March
quotequote all
Fast Bug said:
The wheels are from a 997
Eh? If I'm looking at the correct advert, those are 18" so-called MY02 wheels which came as an option on 986 and 996 (in different widths) - very light, and strong enough.

ETA I'm almost certainly wrong, and would be good for the owner to put the detail in to show how wrong I am, but the profile of the spokes makes me imagine they are the 7.5J and 9J set.


Edited by Orangecurry on Thursday 28th March 14:17

Fast Bug

11,692 posts

161 months

Thursday 28th March
quotequote all
My bad, I thought they looked like the base model 997 wheels from the angle of the photos

ATM

18,289 posts

219 months

Thursday 28th March
quotequote all
Fast Bug said:
My bad, I thought they looked like the base model 997 wheels from the angle of the photos
We expect better from You

chappardababbar

421 posts

143 months

Thursday 28th March
quotequote all
Hi everyone I’m having some custom wheels made in 17 inch.

what would be the offsets in the picture attached? Is it ET55 front and rear?

I quite like the period look with the wheels sitting inside the arches so I’m thinking to go this route.

Tyre size would be Michelin PS4 205/50/17 on the front axle, and 255/40/17 on the rear

Wheels - 7.5 on the front and 9 on the back, as I said, ET55 front and rear.

Going for comfort and the period look. Before I pull the trigger I wanted to run it by the beards in this group.

Are there any considerations? Any good reason to go with an alternative set up? If so what and why?

Thank you

chappardababbar

421 posts

143 months

Thursday 28th March
quotequote all
Hi everyone I’m having some custom wheels made in 17 inch.

what would be the offsets in the picture attached? Is it ET55 front and rear?

I quite like the period look with the wheels sitting inside the arches so I’m thinking to go this route.

Tyre size would be Michelin PS4 205/50/17 on the front axle, and 255/40/17 on the rear

Wheels - 7.5 on the front and 9 on the back, as I said, ET55 front and rear.

Going for comfort and the period look. Before I pull the trigger I wanted to run it by the beards in this group.

Are there any considerations? Any good reason to go with an alternative set up? If so what and why?

Thank you

Chris Stott

13,368 posts

197 months

Thursday 28th March
quotequote all
A 9” et55 is a similar off set to a stock 10” et 65… just 2mm more inside.

For me, that’s too conservative.. the stock fitment isn’t flush enough.

Et50 is the minimum off set of want with a 10” wheel… which would be et38 on a 9”.

ATM

18,289 posts

219 months

Thursday 28th March
quotequote all
chappardababbar said:
Hi everyone I’m having some custom wheels made in 17 inch.

what would be the offsets in the picture attached? Is it ET55 front and rear?

I quite like the period look with the wheels sitting inside the arches so I’m thinking to go this route.

Tyre size would be Michelin PS4 205/50/17 on the front axle, and 255/40/17 on the rear

Wheels - 7.5 on the front and 9 on the back, as I said, ET55 front and rear.

Going for comfort and the period look. Before I pull the trigger I wanted to run it by the beards in this group.

Are there any considerations? Any good reason to go with an alternative set up? If so what and why?

Thank you
There is no picture attached?

As per your previous post - linked below - about this the standard Porsche 17 inch wheels are et55 F and R. I now have 3 sets of these. Depending on how high or how low the suspension is you get a reasonable or massive gap from wheel to arch. I'll add some pics which hopefully demonstrate. I experimented with a 15mm spacer to give et40 on fronts. It definitely affected the steering feel on my more feelsome car. I also experimented with using 4 x rear wheels and therefore 4 x 255 40 tyres. This obviously affected the steering feel too.

It's also worth mentioning that the 997 uses a slightly lower - more inboard - offset - et57 - in its 18 inch setup compared to the 996 18 inch setup - et50. So is Porsche trying to change steering feel on the newer car by increasing offset or is there a different reason for this?

To answer your question you need to decide how much you worry about the look of the car having a big gap between rim to arch and it will depend on how low the car is. Also if the steering will feel different to you using different offsets and if this is something you prefer or dislike. I know which setup I preferred feel wise but you may be different to Me.

What wheels do you have on now and what suspension setup do you have?


https://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&...


No spacers standard front and rear wheels


4 rear wheels


15mm spacers front standard front and rear wheels




Different car here again no spacers standard front and rear wheels






Edited
Higher / Lower offset correction

Edited by ATM on Sunday 31st March 09:24

M3333

2,261 posts

214 months

Saturday 30th March
quotequote all
boxaw said:
It's a 2001 - flippin ebay.

It's mine and yes, ad is a little sparse but happy to answer any questions. It's not pristine but solid, reliable and (I think) very fairly priced given year, mileage and condition. I will miss it.

M3333 said:
Looks like it would be worthy of a viewing if you are local. Nice 98 3.4. Poorly detailed advert but that could be an advantage!

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/335320342798?mkcid=16&a...

Edited by M3333 on Wednesday 27th March 19:48
Looks like a nice straight car. GLWTS. Does it have a glass sunroof? I always thought they were metal topped?