what is an 'early' 3.4 996?

what is an 'early' 3.4 996?

Author
Discussion

richthebike

1,734 posts

138 months

Wednesday 2nd May 2018
quotequote all
More on this later. Have taken the plunge!

gixermark

Original Poster:

742 posts

188 months

Friday 4th May 2018
quotequote all
looks like that silver car went for just over 10K on ebay...... sounded like a pretty honest car for that. anyone on here buy it ?

Converse2020

325 posts

122 months

Friday 4th May 2018
quotequote all
Still available - I don't understand why if its such a good deal it hasn't been snapped up.

gixermark

Original Poster:

742 posts

188 months

Friday 4th May 2018
quotequote all
ah - didn't realize it has been re listed..........

i guess lack of original service book...... and possibly real evidence of service history may be putting folk off...... i imagine if he had decent history he would have the usual picture of a wedge of receipts etc.......

despite not being guards...... if it was local to me i'd certainly be having a gander at it

Fastlane

1,153 posts

218 months

Friday 4th May 2018
quotequote all
Converse2020 said:
Still available - I don't understand why if its such a good deal it hasn't been snapped up.
Perhaps it isn't a good deal after all. Could be hiding some very large bills...

LaurasOtherHalf

21,429 posts

197 months

Friday 4th May 2018
quotequote all
I still lurk on this thread and the vibe is very much as it was for us 993 owners back in the day.


Fastlane

1,153 posts

218 months

Friday 4th May 2018
quotequote all
LaurasOtherHalf said:
I still lurk on this thread and the vibe is very much as it was for us 993 owners back in the day.
Doesn't surprise me - there's a C2 vs C4 thread on 911uk at the moment with the same arguments/comments as a 993 C2 vs C4 thread on here back in 2011!

ATM

18,300 posts

220 months

Friday 4th May 2018
quotequote all
Fastlane said:
LaurasOtherHalf said:
I still lurk on this thread and the vibe is very much as it was for us 993 owners back in the day.
Doesn't surprise me - there's a C2 vs C4 thread on 911uk at the moment with the same arguments/comments as a 993 C2 vs C4 thread on here back in 2011!
Yeah you need to have massive shlong to drive a c2.

LaurasOtherHalf

21,429 posts

197 months

Friday 4th May 2018
quotequote all
ATM said:
Fastlane said:
LaurasOtherHalf said:
I still lurk on this thread and the vibe is very much as it was for us 993 owners back in the day.
Doesn't surprise me - there's a C2 vs C4 thread on 911uk at the moment with the same arguments/comments as a 993 C2 vs C4 thread on here back in 2011!
Yeah you need to have massive shlong to drive a c2.
To clarify I don't necessarily mean it was a bad vide hehe

Dammit

3,790 posts

209 months

Friday 4th May 2018
quotequote all
If I wanted a new carpet set for my 996 cab where should I look?

JS1500

579 posts

178 months

Friday 4th May 2018
quotequote all
Dammit said:
If I wanted a new carpet set for my 996 cab where should I look?
In a 996 cab that someone has left the roof down on while they've popped in to the shops.

richthebike

1,734 posts

138 months

Friday 4th May 2018
quotequote all
JS1500 said:
Dammit said:
If I wanted a new carpet set for my 996 cab where should I look?
In a 996 cab that someone has left the roof down on while they've popped in to the shops.
EBay.
Lots of choice. I'm accumulating bits for my lightweight interior.

identti

2,380 posts

226 months

Friday 4th May 2018
quotequote all
Ahonen said:
Okay, here it is. 1999 3.4 with the sports suspension option and LSD (which is probably worn out now, I know...).

















For me it's the right blend of being in good condition without being too mint - used, but very smart. Completely standard inside and the previous owner spent quite a bit on replacing the small things that I wouldn't notice, like radio knobs, sunvisors and even the cup holders that clip into the air vents.

Mechanically it has had A/C condensors, coffin arms, tyres and multiple other parts in the last 18 months. The previous owner wasn't afraid to spend money when required, which I like. Clutch is less than 10k old, too.

The eagle eyed will notice that there's a tiny spot of rust on the top of the RR arch and that when the wheels were refurbished last summer the company didn't use stainless bolts to rebuild them so they've gone rusty. These are first on the list.

I'm very happy two days in. In fact I'm off outside to fit my Pure Highway 400 DAB adaptor.
That looks familiar. I've recently got a 1999 with the sports pack too - love it. Mine has a Nephrite green interior though!




Chris Stott

13,392 posts

198 months

Tuesday 8th May 2018
quotequote all
ATM...

That was my understanding as well... more compression = more toe... but even ignoring that, the consensus is 996's need at least some rear toe.

Why do you want to go to zero? Trying to make the car feel more agile?

ATM

18,300 posts

220 months

Tuesday 8th May 2018
quotequote all
Chris Stott said:
ATM...

That was my understanding as well... more compression = more toe... but even ignoring that, the consensus is 996's need at least some rear toe.

Why do you want to go to zero? Trying to make the car feel more agile?
Towards zero as in less toe in but not actually 0. The idea being it will feel a bit looser rather than so planted. Read more interesting.

Chris Stott

13,392 posts

198 months

Tuesday 8th May 2018
quotequote all
ATM said:
Chris Stott said:
ATM...

That was my understanding as well... more compression = more toe... but even ignoring that, the consensus is 996's need at least some rear toe.

Why do you want to go to zero? Trying to make the car feel more agile?
Towards zero as in less toe in but not actually 0. The idea being it will feel a bit looser rather than so planted. Read more interesting.
I think the car could feel more agile at lower speeds with less toe (big lift, get the nose pointed, back on the gas), but I think it would feel really uncomfortable at high speed in lower grip situations (in the wet)... Porsche might have tamed most of the lift off oversteer characteristics of 911's, but the weight is still there at the rear, and it will move if you provoke it enough.

Your car doesn't have PSM or TC, does it?

Ahonen

5,017 posts

280 months

Tuesday 8th May 2018
quotequote all
I'll interject here, if I may, as I've run a few racecars in my time, including Porsches.

I wouldn't be inclined to reduce rear toe in the hunt for better rotation. There are various other ways to do it, including playing with the front toe out to improve the initial turn-in reaction. I think it's important to have the toe in at the rear for stability when its required. As Chris said, above, that tail can and will bite with the weight distribution the way it is. Fit some coilovers with adjustable platforms and try changing the rake, which really makes a difference - on the Cup racers (996s and 997s) the rear ride height made a significant balance change and was one of our main tuning aids when the cars were really in the window. Bear in mind that a 997 Cup car would run around 8mm of toe in overall at the rear... Okay, this was on slicks and combined with nearly 5 degrees of rear camber, but you get the idea.

LaurasOtherHalf

21,429 posts

197 months

Wednesday 9th May 2018
quotequote all
https://www.carandclassic.co.uk/car/C108646

Jade green metallic, black interior and low miles.

Edited by LaurasOtherHalf on Wednesday 9th May 09:07

skinny

5,269 posts

236 months

Wednesday 9th May 2018
quotequote all
LaurasOtherHalf said:
That's a brave colour...

ATM

18,300 posts

220 months

Wednesday 9th May 2018
quotequote all
skinny said:
LaurasOtherHalf said:
That's a brave colour...
Shame they didnt go all in and have nephrite too.