what is an 'early' 3.4 996?

what is an 'early' 3.4 996?

Author
Discussion

toastyhamster

1,664 posts

96 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
richthebike said:
toastyhamster said:
Think what I'm ideally after isn't that common:

Aero kit
Black interior
Ideally C2
Manual
Coupe
Ideally not silver

FGP have a nice Guards Red that was on FB for a while, if that came up privately now I'd have it.

Hadn't considered C&C ads, have now set up an alert, thx
The red thing at FGP is a 3.6 I'm afraid.

For some balance, my car came from Luke and it has been fine. He sorted a few niggles, and bought back some bits once I started upgrading.

I know of a few other purchasers who have had decent cars from him with no complaints. FGP aren't 911V, but he does manage to get some decent 3.4s in.
What's wrong with the 3.6? Have to admit despite having done a fair bit of research the whole 996 model/problems thing isn't very clear, so I'll just be buying on condition.

Have already read plenty about FGP but thanks for the heads up.

ATM

18,287 posts

219 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
Chris Stott said:
Toy car!



Model 3 is a decent drive - steering is a bit quick for my tastes, but it’s got great turn in and exit traction that makes even a 911 feel a bit soft.
Come on Chris it's only positivity allowed here about the early 996. There might be a Tesla thread somewhere which would welcome you with open charging points.

toastyhamster

1,664 posts

96 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
MrC986 said:
ATM said:
Has no one noticed the monster brakes on the front. I'm seeing 6 pot calipers, and massive 2 piece floating discs.
Yep, I’d spotted the brakes and the 19” wheels. I directed a friend to this car. It appears to have a Turbo rear bumper (I wonder why?) plus the carbon interior bits. For the £s it didn’t seem overly expensive.
If you look closely in a couple of the shots there's what looks like polishing swirls on the doors, that plus the brakes, plus the interior, plus the "add ons" warns me off this one. Could possibly spend money and make it right but I'd rather have something right to start with and have a slush fund for maintenance.

richthebike

1,733 posts

137 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
toastyhamster said:
What's wrong with the 3.6? Have to admit despite having done a fair bit of research the whole 996 model/problems thing isn't very clear, so I'll just be buying on condition.

Have already read plenty about FGP but thanks for the heads up.
Nothing, they're lovely, just not on this thread tongue out !!

ATM

18,287 posts

219 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
richthebike said:
toastyhamster said:
What's wrong with the 3.6? Have to admit despite having done a fair bit of research the whole 996 model/problems thing isn't very clear, so I'll just be buying on condition.

Have already read plenty about FGP but thanks for the heads up.
Nothing, they're lovely, just not on this thread tongue out !!
Amen to that bro

We pray to the engine reliability gods here who tell us by way of internet rumour that the 3.4 is more robust, more reliable, more raw and therefore must be more sought after.

My mate bought a 3.6 and its absolutely rubbish. Well that's not strictly true. It feels a lot more refined to me but mine has rock hard dampers, roll bars and bushes so it would.

The earlier 3.4 did have coated pistons which some believe helps prevent bore scoring. They stopped the coated pistons after a few years of making the earlier 3.4 cars. I'm not sure if all 3.4 have the coating but the later 3.6 definitely does not. The later 3.6 car is also heavier with more crash protection and safety gubbins. The earliest 3.4 cars also had a cable throttle rather than fly by wire trickery. Some say the cable throttle feels better. I'm not sure about that but I know the early cars came with no traction control. It became available as an option and it was standard on later 3.6 cars I believe. So yes the lightest 996 you can buy is the earliest 3.4 cars with no sunroof.

Dammit

3,790 posts

208 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
roca1976 said:
It looks too violet to be Vers. interesting to see colour code sticker. Could be a PTS colour ?
Definitely needs to lose 19s and yellow painted calipers.
Carbon could be factory options, looks correct on first glance. I was tempted to take a look and maybe swap my 996.2 if the 3.4 was a PTS car with lots of factory options.


C16 UK car
030 Sports suspension -10mm (now Eurocup coilovers)
XAA Aerokit
XJ4 Leather covered ignition key surround
XKD Carbon side air vents
XKJ Carbon defroster trim
XKP Carbon speaker covers
XMJ Carbon centre console
XNR Carbon centre air vent bracket
XNX Carbon dashboard trim strip
XPD Carbon 3 spoke steering wheel (this isn’t present anymore)
XPY Carbon instrument surround
XRL 18” Sport Design wheels (now 19” wheels, unknown type)
XTL Carbon door panel parts
X47 Carbon gear lever
X54 Stainless tail pipes
X58 Carbon handbrake lever
X69 Carbon door entry guards with logo
X71 All-look instrument faces
236 Internal code regarding tyres
288 Headlamp washers
375 2 way electric seat, left
376 2 way electric seat, right
446 Wheel caps with coloured Porsche crest
490 Basic sound system (now a double-din Pioneer)
650 Sunroof

Edited by Dammit on Saturday 16th November 19:21

V8fan

6,293 posts

268 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
ATM said:
Quick Google

TSB #4407, dated March 4, 1997: " Eighteen inch wheels are not approved for use on Boxsters. Use of eighteen inch wheels on Boxsters under severe conditions may result in structural failures of the body and/or suspension".
Perhaps this was only on the 2.5? I would hope they made some changes a couple of years later to compensate. frown I have a 2000 reg 2.7 and the owners manual lists the wheel and tyre size options from 16" to 18" including the 'S.' On a sticker on the car too (Summer tyres only though, winter tyre max size recommended is 17").

ATM

18,287 posts

219 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
V8fan said:
ATM said:
Quick Google

TSB #4407, dated March 4, 1997: " Eighteen inch wheels are not approved for use on Boxsters. Use of eighteen inch wheels on Boxsters under severe conditions may result in structural failures of the body and/or suspension".
Perhaps this was only on the 2.5? I would hope they made some changes a couple of years later to compensate. frown I have a 2000 reg 2.7 and the owners manual lists the wheel and tyre size options from 16" to 18" including the 'S.' On a sticker on the car too (Summer tyres only though, winter tyre max size recommended is 17").
We've all seen 18 inch wheels on early cars both boxster and carrera - althoughthe TSB is warning about boxster only. And yes the very early cars are 2.5. I'm sure on a road car its probably risk free. You would need some serious stress or force to bend or damage a car shell. Driving on a road being sensible I just can't see it. Maybe Porsche were just covering themselves just in case - maybe one car failed and they were covering themselves - who knows.

roca1976

566 posts

115 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
L3AE is Porsche Violet, cool colour!

I doubt it will hang around long at that price.

richthebike

1,733 posts

137 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
roca1976 said:
L3AE is Porsche Violet, cool colour!

I doubt it will hang around long at that price.
Imagine how good it would be on ambers!

ferrisbueller

29,328 posts

227 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
Dammit said:
roca1976 said:
It looks too violet to be Vers. interesting to see colour code sticker. Could be a PTS colour ?
Definitely needs to lose 19s and yellow painted calipers.
Carbon could be factory options, looks correct on first glance. I was tempted to take a look and maybe swap my 996.2 if the 3.4 was a PTS car with lots of factory options.


C16 UK car
030 Sports suspension -10mm (now Eurocup coilovers)
XAA Aerokit
XJ4 Leather covered ignition key surround
XKD Carbon side air vents
XKJ Carbon defroster trim
XKP Carbon speaker covers
XMJ Carbon centre console
XNR Carbon centre air vent bracket
XNX Carbon dashboard trim strip
XPD Carbon 3 spoke steering wheel (this isn’t present anymore)
XPY Carbon instrument surround
XRL 18” Sport Design wheels (now 19” wheels, unknown type)
XTL Carbon door panel parts
X47 Carbon gear lever
X54 Stainless tail pipes
X58 Carbon handbrake lever
X69 Carbon door entry guards with logo
X71 All-look instrument faces
236 Internal code regarding tyres
288 Headlamp washers
375 2 way electric seat, left
376 2 way electric seat, right
446 Wheel caps with coloured Porsche crest
490 Basic sound system (now a double-din Pioneer)
650 Sunroof

Edited by Dammit on Saturday 16th November 19:21
There's a good few quid in carbon in there. The wheels and brakes are nonsense but not insurmountable.

Dammit

3,790 posts

208 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
It goes, steers and stops fine- ride is surprisingly good given the wheels. Gear lever doesn’t return to a central position in neutral but that might just be something that needs fiddling with.

It’s a good car for someone who wants a bit of a project I’d say, and doesn’t mind spending some time and money on it.

MrC986

3,492 posts

191 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
Dammit said:


C16 UK car
030 Sports suspension -10mm (now Eurocup coilovers)
XAA Aerokit
XJ4 Leather covered ignition key surround
XKD Carbon side air vents
XKJ Carbon defroster trim
XKP Carbon speaker covers
XMJ Carbon centre console
XNR Carbon centre air vent bracket
XNX Carbon dashboard trim strip
XPD Carbon 3 spoke steering wheel (this isn’t present anymore)
XPY Carbon instrument surround
XRL 18” Sport Design wheels (now 19” wheels, unknown type)
XTL Carbon door panel parts
X47 Carbon gear lever
X54 Stainless tail pipes
X58 Carbon handbrake lever
X69 Carbon door entry guards with logo
X71 All-look instrument faces
236 Internal code regarding tyres
288 Headlamp washers
375 2 way electric seat, left
376 2 way electric seat, right
446 Wheel caps with coloured Porsche crest
490 Basic sound system (now a double-din Pioneer)
650 Sunroof

Edited by Dammit on Saturday 16th November 19:21
The carbon bits take a lot of code space on the spec sticker (just like mine). I suspect the alloys might be HRE manufacture & might be worth some reasonable £s given they are 19s.

jimmy p

960 posts

166 months

Sunday 17th November 2019
quotequote all
I think I looked at this car some years ago when it was for sale think somewhere in west mids. It was before all the mods had been done. It had full grey interior then with carbon everywhere.
Car itself looked fine but lots of the carbon had gone off from being exposed to the sun and aged, it had cracked in loads of places especially the top of the dash and on steering wheel. I looked at the cost and if these parts are actually still available and it put me off in the end. Looks like the worn grey seats have been replaced along with steering wheel and the dash, this would of been done due to all the knackered carbon bit I imagine.
Was a good colour with sun on it!

Dammit

3,790 posts

208 months

Sunday 17th November 2019
quotequote all
Sounds like the same car, the CF is lifting off the underlying plastic and will need to be bonded back down. Ashtray lid is missing- I wonder what a CF ashtray costs?

jimmy p

960 posts

166 months

Sunday 17th November 2019
quotequote all
I dont think the genuine carbon bits are available. You would have to get one made up

ATM

18,287 posts

219 months

Sunday 17th November 2019
quotequote all
Surely you would just toss off all the carbon and max power bits. I think the car sits quite low so I'd guess some coil overs too. The brakes could be kept if they fit below an 18 inch wheel maybe. The ad does say 8 pot brakes so they're maybe bigger than a 996tt which feels a bit much to me. I think they might be some unbranded calipers too so no idea if the brake bias would be fine. With all that disc up front would you need some more oomph from the rear brakes too.

Of course the bits could all be super expensive top quality you just wont know till you start digging. The car may have had some buckets fitted and been used for track work. Maybe someone part ex that car for another from their stock. It seems an odd car for them looking at their other stock.

I'm not sure it will fly out but lets see. I dont think there are many early 996 buyers out there who are willing to mess around with projects like this but you never know. If it does fly out then it will prove me wrong and show there are buyers out there waiting to pounce on the right car.

Dammit

3,790 posts

208 months

Sunday 17th November 2019
quotequote all
It's on Eurocup coilovers apparently, with what look to be adustable top mounts:


Fast Bug

11,689 posts

161 months

Sunday 17th November 2019
quotequote all
Went to the Out East PCGB meet this morning


ATM

18,287 posts

219 months

Sunday 17th November 2019
quotequote all
Big fat tyre on the back there looking good