992 GT3.. is here....

992 GT3.. is here....

Author
Discussion

luigisayshello

245 posts

95 months

Thursday 26th November 2020
quotequote all
Not wanting to reinforce no one, but weight loss is a wallet numbers game. 90kg is not farfetched at all especially if you start from a heavy spec.
Magnesium wheels +-10kg, battery +-10kg, full inconel exhaust or titanium +-30-40 kg, carbon ceramics if you are on steels, carbon front carbon roof, perspex rear windows, lightweight starter and alternator, carbon oil tank, there are tools already made as well as the carbon fiber R&D for the intake plenum of the 991 R, that is not much different from the 991, requirements wise, etc etc.
You can remove the heavy heatshields with the new exhaust and create a simple carbon barrier, lots of weight savings here, plenty of little stuff that can be redone light and better that will save weight.

Literally loads of tasty light stuff available to those who want and can.

993rsr

3,434 posts

250 months

Thursday 26th November 2020
quotequote all
luigisayshello said:
Not wanting to reinforce no one, but weight loss is a wallet numbers game. 90kg is not farfetched at all especially if you start from a heavy spec.
Magnesium wheels +-10kg, battery +-10kg, full inconel exhaust or titanium +-30-40 kg, carbon ceramics if you are on steels, carbon front carbon roof, perspex rear windows, lightweight starter and alternator, carbon oil tank, there are tools already made as well as the carbon fiber R&D for the intake plenum of the 991 R, that is not much different from the 991, requirements wise, etc etc.
You can remove the heavy heatshields with the new exhaust and create a simple carbon barrier, lots of weight savings here, plenty of little stuff that can be redone light and better that will save weight.

Literally loads of tasty light stuff available to those who want and can.
In the extreme yes, but no-one realistically is going to do that to a 991.2 GT3 and certainly no-one on Pistonheads with rose jointed suspension on their non RS GT3.

So the reality of what someone will do without carving their car to pieces is much, much less.

Porsche911R

21,146 posts

266 months

Thursday 26th November 2020
quotequote all
993rsr said:
Porsche911R said:
Has even one other poster or owner Rose jointed the non RS 991.2 GT3 in the UK ? just me I expect.

Edited by Porsche911R on Thursday 26th November 12:00
And the point of that statement is what precisely? Makes you even quicker on track in your GT3 that you haven't tracked? Makes you a better more skilled driver with this modification?

The irony, as always, is lost on you...
I posted how to save 200lbs which you said was bks.

I fitted cup parts to my car to aid feel and confidence in the car, so yes it makes me a better driver I feel, the same as Porsche have now done in the 992 non RS GT3 to allow owners to get more feel and push the car with a bit more confidence, it's a very worth while mod as the EPS removes any NVH the cup parts would add to a 997 as an example, so no down side but many up sides. My car also has more front track, yet again another item talked about in the 992 vid, most 3rd party shops remove track pulling the top of the wheel in with top mounts ! , I have pushed the top of the wheel out as far as it will go and then with the CUP arms moved the bottom of the wheel out more to get the camber with the extra track.

I am very happy to debate my mods and any weight savings, and will always back up any comments I make with data, you are free to have a drive of my car any time in 2021 if you wish to try these things out, I hope to be at a lot more track events in 2021.

jcosh

1,172 posts

233 months

Thursday 26th November 2020
quotequote all
993rsr said:
Porsche911R said:
Has even one other poster or owner Rose jointed the non RS 991.2 GT3 in the UK ? just me I expect.

Edited by Porsche911R on Thursday 26th November 12:00
And the point of that statement is what precisely? Makes you even quicker on track in your GT3 that you haven't tracked? Makes you a better more skilled driver with this modification?

The irony, as always, is lost on you...
993rsr, what's the latest on David's tracking of his GT3? Has he fessed up yet?

Back on topic. The new car looks interesting. But not overly desirable on the styling front, that might improve when seen property / with time.

As for David's ramblings on weight reductions of the 991.2 to produce better performance than the 992, very amusing. If you start removing washer fluid etc you are missing the point and not comparing like for like.

Porsche911R

21,146 posts

266 months

Thursday 26th November 2020
quotequote all
luigisayshello said:
Not wanting to reinforce no one, but weight loss is a wallet numbers game. 90kg is not farfetched at all especially if you start from a heavy spec.
Magnesium wheels +-10kg, battery +-10kg, full inconel exhaust or titanium +-30-40 kg, carbon ceramics if you are on steels, carbon front carbon roof, perspex rear windows, lightweight starter and alternator, carbon oil tank, there are tools already made as well as the carbon fiber R&D for the intake plenum of the 991 R, that is not much different from the 991, requirements wise, etc etc.
You can remove the heavy heatshields with the new exhaust and create a simple carbon barrier, lots of weight savings here, plenty of little stuff that can be redone light and better that will save weight.

Literally loads of tasty light stuff available to those who want and can.
it's a drug if you are into cars and getting the best from them I find, and I am not into much else to spend my hard earned on.
total waste of money :-) but I like it.

Porsche911R

21,146 posts

266 months

Thursday 26th November 2020
quotequote all
jcosh said:
993rsr, what's the latest on David's tracking of his GT3? Has he fessed up yet?

Back on topic. The new car looks interesting. But not overly desirable on the styling front, that might improve when seen property / with time.

As for David's ramblings on weight reductions of the 991.2 to produce better performance than the 992, very amusing. If you start removing washer fluid etc you are missing the point and not comparing like for like.
I put the washer fluid in for a laugh and knew some one would pick up on it and post ;-)

The point is 200 lbs is pretty easy to remove if you so wish.

Edited by Porsche911R on Thursday 26th November 13:16

luigisayshello

245 posts

95 months

Thursday 26th November 2020
quotequote all
993rsr said:
In the extreme yes, but no-one realistically is going to do that to a 991.2 GT3 and certainly no-one on Pistonheads with rose jointed suspension on their non RS GT3.

So the reality of what someone will do without carving their car to pieces is much, much less.
There is someone making an R probably go 1000kg or sub 1000kg. Plenty of 991.2 gt3 on coilovers (that by the way can be a tasty side to shed weight, titanium springs are a thing of wonder and shock bodies and internals with enough attention can give an extra +1kg plus per corner), full exhaust with side mufflers deleter and fairly lighter part for part rest of the exhaust, mags, light weight battery.

Rose joints are actually nice for street, as long the suspension is not harshly sprung and dampers actually work, but is a bit of a pain because they go out much earlier than bushes and impact quite a bit more, even tho Porsche ones do seem to hold quite well vs other manufacturers.

But I agree with what you are trying to say, this is a bit of an extreme and requires quite a little bit of thought to make it work and not ruin what is a brilliant car.
Plus it's bloody expensive by the time one is flirting past 100kg the current bill will be probably close enough to buy another 991.2 gt3.

Twinfan

10,125 posts

105 months

Thursday 26th November 2020
quotequote all
Melvynr said:
Allready on its way, spotted in Euro tunnel

Nice! I wonder if the Carrera Cup GB will get them too. Maybe just Supercup for the first year though?

Steve Rance

5,446 posts

232 months

Thursday 26th November 2020
quotequote all
Leftfootwonder said:
I'm happy to be corrected but my understanding is that the 'engineering challenges' revolved around the desire for space for a golf bag in the 'frunk' and little else (aside from cost saving).

Many normal cars have had double wishbones for 30+ years, but because Porsche have now done it, only now is it a good idea. rolleyes
Exactly. That is the challenge for a rear engined car with a boot in the front. The top wishbone will infringe upon boot space. However if you want to improve on the current method of locating the top of the suspension axle (which is very effective) you will probably need reasonably long top wishbones.

The 911 has done pretty well on the racetrack so far against many cars with the ‘superior’ double wishbone set up. On that basis I’m assuming that they will want to make the most of a top wishbone rather than cramming in something tiny and ineffective. Having a top wishbone per se isn’t necessarily a great advantage.

Porsche911R

21,146 posts

266 months

Thursday 26th November 2020
quotequote all
luigisayshello said:
There is someone making an R .
I follow Robert Linton on Insta and his work on his R is stunning.
his insta is robertlinton1

993rsr

3,434 posts

250 months

Thursday 26th November 2020
quotequote all
Porsche911R said:
I follow Robert Linton on Insta and his work on his R is stunning.
his insta is robertlinton1
Does he ask you for some pointers with your abundance of experience?

Melvynr

1,404 posts

52 months

Thursday 26th November 2020
quotequote all
Twinfan said:
Nice! I wonder if the Carrera Cup GB will get them too. Maybe just Supercup for the first year though?
I lied to you buddy, it’s on its way to Manchester for my little cousin, remote controlled and looks the part.Lololol.

Twinfan

10,125 posts

105 months

Thursday 26th November 2020
quotequote all
Melvynr said:
Twinfan said:
Nice! I wonder if the Carrera Cup GB will get them too. Maybe just Supercup for the first year though?
I lied to you buddy, it’s on its way to Manchester for my little cousin, remote controlled and looks the part.Lololol.
Ha ha - nice one! Totally fell for it! laughbeer

bigmowley

1,896 posts

177 months

Thursday 26th November 2020
quotequote all
OMG that garage. Literally my idea of heaven. I’ve not worked hard enough in my life gutted.

Looks ok to me but not sure about the blue painted bit of the rear wing, possibly just the angle in the video but looks a bit iffy. The blue pinstripe on the wheels noooooooo wrong on so many levels. yikes

650spider

1,476 posts

172 months

Thursday 26th November 2020
quotequote all
Porsche911R said:
Are they admitting the 380MM steels were too small now ?

They had to remove weight from the car but decided to add weight on brake upsizing and wheel sizes and tyre weight? tyres I get.

I would not be shocked if my car were faster upto a point on the road, it's lighter than oem and less drag at lower speeds and no 21" rear, AP states "time the car 140-170MPh" this is the aero advantage and less drag.
And bang that's how they got the RS beating time on the 3 big straight sections on the ring where the cars reach 260 to 300 kph.

if you read into what they have done to add feel and confidence in the 992 it's add rose joints and front track.
I have done both of those things to my car and it's night and day over oem to drive from a feel point of view.
(owners won't mod their assets I know, but just do it)
Remove 200lbs from the 991.2 which is fairly easy and on the ROAD you may just have the better smaller car in the old one and it's sounds better also, imho.

People will lol at that, but Porsche had to focus the 992 GT3 back to track and most don't track. If you have a garage at the ring or Spa the 992 will be killer and the car to own, if you want to be the new kid on the block at SCD the 992 will be the car to own.

If you want a smaller lighter focused road racer with no OPF issues (is this what a GT3 is and has always been to me) tweak the 991.2 in the same way AP has tweaked the 992 GT3.

I like the new car bar the bigger size and digital dash, and I await the proper tech walk though.

Edited by Porsche911R on Thursday 26th November 10:03
Are you the guy that Chris Harris was talking about in the podcast?

Just wondering...

MDL111

6,958 posts

178 months

Thursday 26th November 2020
quotequote all
993rsr said:
VonSenger said:
Purple Man said:
Remove 200lbs from the 991.2 which is fairly easy and on the ROAD you may just have the better smaller car in the old one and it's sounds better also, imho.

Can you give me the heads up on how you 'fairly easily' remove 200lbs from a GT3?

Thanks.
Dave just leaves his delusion at home.
On my GT3 T with BBS mags and a LWB it's circa 65lbs of saving, 200 lbs is another one of Demon's figures grabbed from thin air for affect.
In fairness I think if you throw some money at the car and don’t have to adhere to TÜV (UK MOT much more forgiving), you can save quite a lot of weight - I think 90kg should be possible / so it doesn’t sound like complete fantasy to me (battery, exhaust, rims, no cage, no aircon, a couple of carbon parts such as wings, bonnet, lexan rear window should get you close)

Edit: never mind, just read the rest of the thread

Edited by MDL111 on Thursday 26th November 13:58

Steve Rance

5,446 posts

232 months

Thursday 26th November 2020
quotequote all
Definitely scope for a chunk of weight saving in an RS but I suppose it’s understandable that a vanilla GT3 could carry a little lard. On saying that, not a CS version. That should really be a fair bit lighter in standard spec.

Digga

40,334 posts

284 months

Thursday 26th November 2020
quotequote all
I took 75kg out of my GT3 last night.

Porsche911R

21,146 posts

266 months

Thursday 26th November 2020
quotequote all
Digga said:
I took 75kg out of my GT3 last night.
I would tell your wife to loose a bit of weight ;-)

Digga

40,334 posts

284 months

Thursday 26th November 2020
quotequote all
Porsche911R said:
I would tell your wife to loose a bit of weight ;-)
It was me, actually maybe 80kg, not sure, but you get the gist.

ETA: She drove it for the first time yesterday - had to get it out of the garage to give electricians access. But did not want to reverse it back in.