Lowering Generation 2 Cayman

Lowering Generation 2 Cayman

Author
Discussion

chriswren

45 posts

283 months

Thursday 12th June 2014
quotequote all
ilduce said:
I'll have to disagree. That looks all wrong.
I agree, nothing wrong with lowering the car but have to be careful with the wheels. In this case the wheels are wrong and to big, don't fill the arches nicely.

If you look at the picture of the CR you can see that the wheels sit in the arches properly

mrdemon

21,146 posts

266 months

Thursday 12th June 2014
quotequote all
wonder how 30mm will effect trunk clunk

30mm is a lot of travel to loose on the wrong shocks.


mrdemon

21,146 posts

266 months

Friday 13th June 2014
quotequote all
that SPyder has KW3 and RSS toe links, that's not really just a set of springs is it, looks like 3k worth of stuff.

not that fitting 18mm spacer will help that car increasing the rear track over the front even more.
done for the looks over handling !!!

I have spacers but just on the front to aid turn in like the 981 car has got wider front track.

ilduce

485 posts

128 months

Friday 13th June 2014
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
So you admit it looks odd or as I said, "all wrong", in that photo?



ilduce

485 posts

128 months

Saturday 14th June 2014
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
You think you're always right. You must have a vagina. THAT'S it.

ilduce

485 posts

128 months

Saturday 14th June 2014
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Google tells me your reference was to a cartoon character, FFS!

I'm not continuing an argument with someone with one less chromosome
than me so we shall have to agree to disagree.

ORD

18,120 posts

128 months

Saturday 14th June 2014
quotequote all
Cmoose has got himself in another squabble!

Ildouche is a poor choice for a sparing partner.

ilduce

485 posts

128 months

Saturday 14th June 2014
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
You know he's not real don't you?
Like that model Spitfire you have hanging from the ceiling.

ilduce

485 posts

128 months

Saturday 14th June 2014
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Shh now. Finish your homework and then go and play outside.

hondansx

4,574 posts

226 months

Sunday 15th June 2014
quotequote all
Tell me this; the new Cayman with Sports Suspension has the wheels practically under the arches. So have Porsche got it wrong? As others have said, does the GT3 look awful against a standard 911?

I have H&Rs on my 997 and it looks perfect in my eyes. No loss of ride quality and handling feels exactly the same to me. I won't be tracking it, so the finite difference is of no relevance to me.

I did a lot of forum searching seeking opinions. One guy has had the springs fitted for over 4 years and the dampers are fine.

jcarruthers

64 posts

120 months

Sunday 15th June 2014
quotequote all
The reason the 987 doesn't look quite right lowered is to do with the front wheel arch. The 987 wheel arches curve around to mimic the wheel radius.

The 981 wheel arches don't curve around as much as the 987s — the same with the 991 or 997 — so they look better lowered.

The Boxster Spyder also has a piece of black trim to hide this return — in the same way the GT3 has a piece of trim.

That's why I reckon a 911 or the latest Cayman looks better lowered than a 987 Cayman — at least that's what it looks like in the Google searches I've just done to check my hypothesis.


Edited by jcarruthers on Sunday 15th June 21:04

ilduce

485 posts

128 months

Monday 16th June 2014
quotequote all
Don't bother arguing with him, he's had one Boxster and some shopping cars, so knows everything.

Mmmme

8 posts

119 months

Monday 16th June 2014
quotequote all
As a brand new member with no axe to grind and is simply looking to get info on his next new Porsche...

There's nothing wrong with shopping cars.
And 24,000 posts? I'm sure this wasn't your best.

Now shake on it!

ilduce

485 posts

128 months

Tuesday 17th June 2014
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
No idea what you are talking about.
Neither do you as you can't even spell buffoon.

ilduce

485 posts

128 months

Tuesday 17th June 2014
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Ha! Ok. Truce.

jmcc42uk

110 posts

181 months

Wednesday 8th February 2017
quotequote all
Anyone else lowered their Cayman with Springs lately?

I'm thinking about H&R Springs but my car has PASM

JonN981

34 posts

128 months

Thursday 9th February 2017
quotequote all
I've recently had fitted a set of ST Suspension lowering springs fitted to my 981 Cayman 2.7, non PASM. They are available from Design 911 at c £300 inc VAT. They lower the car by 20mm, the same as the Porsche sport suspension option. I think fitting and full geo came in at a bit less than £500.
Good quality and very pleased with the result. If anything, very slightly firmer ride but perfectly acceptable. Handling has certainly not suffered. I personally find it hard to believe that reducing the overall suspension travel by 20mm will have any detrimental effect on longevity of dampers, but we'll see.

castroses

247 posts

99 months

Thursday 9th February 2017
quotequote all
Funny to see demon and cmoose arguing like a couple of whiny little bhes at the start of this thread. I'd assumed they were the same person? Surely not two tts as annoying as both of them with their 'I will argue till I die just because I'm a ****' attitudes.

Carry on.

a4ash

114 posts

242 months

Thursday 9th February 2017
quotequote all


I think this one may have been lowered a little bit

jmcc42uk

110 posts

181 months

Thursday 9th February 2017
quotequote all
Any chance of getting back on topic?