Cayman R Chat

Author
Discussion

Escy

3,952 posts

150 months

Tuesday 20th September 2022
quotequote all
Can you name the other significant enhancements?

philj

108 posts

225 months

Tuesday 20th September 2022
quotequote all
Escy said:
Can you name the other significant enhancements?
Aluminium doors.

Nurburgsingh

5,124 posts

239 months

Tuesday 20th September 2022
quotequote all
Escy said:
Can you name the other significant enhancements?
R has the GT3 doors so they are lighter, the steering rack is different too - I think thats probably the one that provides the greatest 'feels different' element

PaulD86

1,676 posts

127 months

Tuesday 20th September 2022
quotequote all
Escy said:
Can you name the other significant enhancements?
Yes. Can you?

Slippydiff

14,871 posts

224 months

Tuesday 20th September 2022
quotequote all
philj said:
Escy said:
Can you name the other significant enhancements?
Aluminium doors.
15kg or approx 3 gallons of fuel ...

Steering rack differs from that of the 3.4S ? First I’ve heard of it.

Slippydiff

14,871 posts

224 months

Tuesday 20th September 2022
quotequote all
Out of all the differences the R gained, I’d say the dampers and springs were the significant game-changers, everything else was merely “garnish” to justify the “R” moniker (pun intended) tongue outtongue out

Anyone that’s done a deep dive into the original 911R’s built by the factory in the 60’s will know it was VERY special car indeed, and Porsche using it on the Cayman was a very cynical marketing ploy indeed.

Andyoz

2,890 posts

55 months

Tuesday 20th September 2022
quotequote all
Nurburgsingh said:
Escy said:
Can you name the other significant enhancements?
R has the GT3 doors so they are lighter, the steering rack is different too - I think thats probably the one that provides the greatest 'feels different' element
Pretty sure racks identical. R came with more negative camber on front from stock and combined with suspension and slight weight drop does make it feel more nimble.

There lots of aesthetic things though that all add up.


Edited by Andyoz on Tuesday 20th September 13:12

tracydeedance

786 posts

180 months

Tuesday 20th September 2022
quotequote all
Smaller tank on some less weight

BrotherMouzone

3,169 posts

175 months

Tuesday 20th September 2022
quotequote all
tracydeedance said:
Smaller tank on some less weight
I prefer the optional big tank. More convenient for touring.

R got LSD as standard haven’t they?

Andyoz

2,890 posts

55 months

Tuesday 20th September 2022
quotequote all
The R is still good value within the madness that is Porsche prices now.

tracydeedance

786 posts

180 months

Tuesday 20th September 2022
quotequote all
BrotherMouzone said:
tracydeedance said:
Smaller tank on some less weight
I prefer the optional big tank. More convenient for touring.

R got LSD as standard haven’t they?
Yes LSD is standard regardless of gearbox type

Not sure if been mentioned light weight spyder alloy wheels

Gibbo205

3,558 posts

208 months

Tuesday 20th September 2022
quotequote all
Hi there

Any contemplating selling their R in near future or anyone interested in a swap for a 987.2 Spyder which has manual. buckets, ceramics, short shifter, spyder wheels, please get in touch. smile

Edited by Gibbo205 on Tuesday 20th September 15:17

Jim1556

1,774 posts

157 months

Tuesday 20th September 2022
quotequote all
From EVO's review - standard upgrades in bold...

EVO said:
The R is 55kg lighter than an S. How? Slimline 19-inch wheels (from the Boxster Spyder), light aluminium door skins (a la 911 turbo), lighter sports bucket seats and 15kg is saved from the removal of the hi-fi and air-con though some opted to add them back at zero cost.

An extra 9bhp has been liberated from the 3.4-litre six-cylinder engine thanks to a new exhaust manifold and ECU program. Maximum power is now rated at 325bhp at 7400rpm and a LSD is standard.

Porsche's PASM is not fitted and the car is 20mm lower than the Cayman S thanks to shorter and stiffer springs.

A fixed rear spoiler (reducing lift by 40%) and a revised front splitter (-15% lift) is fitted, and of course the all-important PORSCHE lettering on the side that knocks a second (at least) off the 0-60mph time...
I thought the doors were from the GT3, not the turbo? Seems not...

Great cars, want one, bought a bigger house instead... cry

AAAndy

726 posts

253 months

Tuesday 20th September 2022
quotequote all
Jim1556 said:
From EVO's review - standard upgrades in bold...

EVO said:
The R is 55kg lighter than an S. How? Slimline 19-inch wheels (from the Boxster Spyder), light aluminium door skins (a la 911 turbo), lighter sports bucket seats and 15kg is saved from the removal of the hi-fi and air-con though some opted to add them back at zero cost.

An extra 9bhp has been liberated from the 3.4-litre six-cylinder engine thanks to a new exhaust manifold and ECU program. Maximum power is now rated at 325bhp at 7400rpm and a LSD is standard.

Porsche's PASM is not fitted and the car is 20mm lower than the Cayman S thanks to shorter and stiffer springs.

A fixed rear spoiler (reducing lift by 40%) and a revised front splitter (-15% lift) is fitted, and of course the all-important PORSCHE lettering on the side that knocks a second (at least) off the 0-60mph time...
Great cars, want one, bought a bigger house instead... cry
I thought the doors were from the GT3, not the turbo? Seems not...

Potentially thelighter weight doors are the same on turbo and GT3, but the R had the door cards from the GT3 without the pockets.

In addition to the above the believe that the ARB's are also different.

Does anyone know if the traction control programme in sports plus is any different? Was there any reduction in sound deadening?

And for some of us, on top of the driving experience the Peridot Green colour option really makes it stand out visually.


bigmowley

1,902 posts

177 months

Tuesday 20th September 2022
quotequote all
Don’t forget deletion of the cowl over the instruments. Annoys me every time I get a reflection in the screen at night. rolleyes
That and probably another 50 little modifications that are very hard to spot. It’s the Porsche way after all.

Slippydiff

14,871 posts

224 months

Tuesday 20th September 2022
quotequote all
Andyoz said:
The R is still good value within the madness that is Porsche prices now.
I think you mean the Gen 2 3.4 S Cayman is still good value Andy ... ?

Andyoz

2,890 posts

55 months

Tuesday 20th September 2022
quotequote all
AAAndy said:
Jim1556 said:
From EVO's review - standard upgrades in bold...

EVO said:
The R is 55kg lighter than an S. How? Slimline 19-inch wheels (from the Boxster Spyder), light aluminium door skins (a la 911 turbo), lighter sports bucket seats and 15kg is saved from the removal of the hi-fi and air-con though some opted to add them back at zero cost.

An extra 9bhp has been liberated from the 3.4-litre six-cylinder engine thanks to a new exhaust manifold and ECU program. Maximum power is now rated at 325bhp at 7400rpm and a LSD is standard.

Porsche's PASM is not fitted and the car is 20mm lower than the Cayman S thanks to shorter and stiffer springs.

A fixed rear spoiler (reducing lift by 40%) and a revised front splitter (-15% lift) is fitted, and of course the all-important PORSCHE lettering on the side that knocks a second (at least) off the 0-60mph time...
Great cars, want one, bought a bigger house instead... cry
I thought the doors were from the GT3, not the turbo? Seems not...

Potentially thelighter weight doors are the same on turbo and GT3, but the R had the door cards from the GT3 without the pockets.

In addition to the above the believe that the ARB's are also different.

Does anyone know if the traction control programme in sports plus is any different? Was there any reduction in sound deadening?

And for some of us, on top of the driving experience the Peridot Green colour option really makes it stand out visually.
Yes, door cards are simpler type than the S (no lower carpet, light, etc). All these little things just add up and if you want to keep the car pretty stock are worth the delta over an S if you get one with buckets. If you want a mod platform, the S probably makes more sense.

julian987R

6,840 posts

60 months

Tuesday 20th September 2022
quotequote all
AndyP74 said:
Much as I hate writing these words, it's the right thing to do. I'm selling my Cayman R due to time being swallowed up by children and a job that requires a large chunk of travel.

It's Peridot, manual, sports exhaust, sport chrono, carbon buckets, full OPC service history (the last one in June of this year), just under 14k miles, black wheels.

Anyone on here interested before I start advertising in the usual places?

Edited by AndyP74 on Saturday 3rd September 20:41
Did you sell it as user B21ONY on this thread is looking for what you have for sale..
https://www.caymanoc.com/forums/topic/2742-tidy-98...

GT03

2,335 posts

181 months

Tuesday 20th September 2022
quotequote all
Good source here, table below:

Item S Option Change
Front and rear aerokit Option
Limited slip differential Option
Performance exhaust & ECU R only +10bhp
Retuned springs/dampers/ARBs R only -20mm
Aluminum doors and lightweight door panels R only -15kg
Air conditioning delete R only -12kg
Carbon fibre bucket seats Option -12kg
'Other' weight savings R only -7kg
19" lightweight forged BBS wheels R only -5kg
Radio and speakers delete R only -3kg
Removal of storage compartments R only -1kg

ChrisW.

6,335 posts

256 months

Wednesday 21st September 2022
quotequote all
So now to the question, what would it cost to add these things to an 987 Gen2 S ??

The R was a special car ... but agreed Slippy not the 650Kg ? lightweight of the 911R ...

It's interesting that the first GT3RSR was called the GT3R in 1999 ... until 2004 when it went sequential gearbox and then with the logical RSR nomenclature.

The R / Clubsport / RS / RSR / Touring / Lightweight / GT / GTS / NGT ? ..... ? market segmentations have always been blurred ....

Edited by ChrisW. on Wednesday 21st September 08:32