Cayman R Chat

Author
Discussion

fridaypassion

8,570 posts

229 months

Sunday 27th March 2016
quotequote all
N1VES has done this swap also

Barleyboy

49 posts

108 months

Sunday 27th March 2016
quotequote all
boxsey said:
Yes, I've been looking into getting a set of 18s but want to try michelin super sports. However, they don't come in the recommended front size (235/40/18). I could get the super sport as a 225/40/18 but am not sure it would be advisable to run a narrower tyre? I know the super sport won't have the grip of the V70 in the dry but would prefer the super sport for wet track days. I've used the Toyo R888 for many years and got fed up sitting out a lot of the day when it was wet. Hence why I'd like to move away from a full R compound tyre. So at the moment I'm leaning towards getting a second set of 19s to take the correct size super sports (235/35/19 and 265/35/19).
I have used cup2s 235/40/18 on golf r which should be 225/40/18. Work really well so have you looked at 245/40/18s or 235 cup2s?? They are a bit scary when wet but you take your risks when pushing on track. Cat litter waiting !

boxsey

3,574 posts

211 months

Monday 28th March 2016
quotequote all
Barleyboy said:
I have used cup2s 235/40/18 on golf r which should be 225/40/18. Work really well so have you looked at 245/40/18s or 235 cup2s?? They are a bit scary when wet but you take your risks when pushing on track. Cat litter waiting !
Thanks Barleyboy. The cup 2 is the opposite problem...you can get the fronts for 18s (235/40/18) but not the rears (265/40/18)! However, even if they were available I put the cup 2 in the same great in the dry but risky in the wet category as the R888, V70 an DZ03.

Regarding the alternative super sport size I'd choose the smaller 225 option over the larger 245 option as the latter are not recommended on an 8J rim (greater chance of them rolling off the rim).

Porsche911R

21,146 posts

266 months

Monday 28th March 2016
quotequote all
Spyder wheels are the larger 8.5 size same as the gt4 which runs a 245 front.
But to keep every thing happy one would want to then fit a 275 to the rear.

PSM is fussy on Porkers ESP the 987.2 cars.

GT4P

5,211 posts

186 months

Monday 28th March 2016
quotequote all
BubblesNW said:
I think you will be in for a bit of a surprise. Doesn't feel much quicker until you see the times..
I ran a 987 spyder before my gt4 and Iam only taking the gt4 to 4k revs as still running in but it already seems a lot quicker!

Porsche911R

21,146 posts

266 months

Monday 28th March 2016
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
1st point is 100% correct which states you get a shorter brake travel !

Please go and fit one and stop talking about it for 3 years saying best thing ever, when a : you have not driven a 987.2 car with one and b: you won't fit one to your car !

Porsche911R

21,146 posts

266 months

Monday 28th March 2016
quotequote all
GT4P said:
I ran a 987 spyder before my gt4 and Iam only taking the gt4 to 4k revs as still running in but it already seems a lot quicker!
My spyder will piss all over a GT4 if you keep to 4K revs lol
What a daft comment.

HokumPokum

2,051 posts

206 months

Monday 28th March 2016
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Is the brake pedal height fully adjustable? Mine is too high compared with the accelerator pedal. Can it be adjusted lower?

GT4P

5,211 posts

186 months

Monday 28th March 2016
quotequote all
Porsche911R said:
GT4P said:
I ran a 987 spyder before my gt4 and Iam only taking the gt4 to 4k revs as still running in but it already seems a lot quicker!
My spyder will piss all over a GT4 if you keep to 4K revs lol
What a daft comment.
Not daft at all the gt4 up to 4k revs already seems/feels a lot quicker than a 987. Spyder/ R to 4k revs! So it's going to be a hella of a lot quicker on full chat when I finally open it up!
So will your Spyder keeping to 4k revs piss a gt4 keeping to 4 k revs ? Don't think so!

HokumPokum

2,051 posts

206 months

Monday 28th March 2016
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Thanks

ORD

18,120 posts

128 months

Tuesday 29th March 2016
quotequote all
GT4P said:
Not daft at all the gt4 up to 4k revs already seems/feels a lot quicker than a 987. Spyder/ R to 4k revs! So it's going to be a hella of a lot quicker on full chat when I finally open it up!
So will your Spyder keeping to 4k revs piss a gt4 keeping to 4 k revs ? Don't think so!
That's partly because the GT4 has a down tuned, torquey engine. It's faster, of course, but probably less than you would think from pootling in each. The 987 needs and rewards revs more than the GT4, which is a shame.

n17ves

591 posts

179 months

Tuesday 29th March 2016
quotequote all
fridaypassion said:
N1VES has done this swap also
Yes I did smile

n17ves

591 posts

179 months

Tuesday 29th March 2016
quotequote all
ORD said:
GT4P said:
Not daft at all the gt4 up to 4k revs already seems/feels a lot quicker than a 987. Spyder/ R to 4k revs! So it's going to be a hella of a lot quicker on full chat when I finally open it up!
So will your Spyder keeping to 4k revs piss a gt4 keeping to 4 k revs ? Don't think so!
That's partly because the GT4 has a down tuned, torquey engine. It's faster, of course, but probably less than you would think from pootling in each. The 987 needs and rewards revs more than the GT4, which is a shame.
3.8 vs 3.4, the 3.8 will always have more torque when torque is directly related to the cubic capacity of the engine. I disagree about the 987 rewarding revs more than GT4....okay the GT4 has a flat power band, but actually has a higher redline than the Cayman R and this still requires exploiting to extract 100% of the power.

In terms of performance the GT4 is faster than the R (pretty obvious looking at stats), but I wouldn't say its that much faster in a drag race. The torque is obviously better though.



Porsche911R

21,146 posts

266 months

Tuesday 29th March 2016
quotequote all
n17ves said:
. I disagree about the 987 rewarding revs more than GT4....okay the GT4 has a flat power band, but actually has a higher redline than the Cayman R and this still requires exploiting to extract 100% of the power.
higher red line where power falls off like a stone at 7.5k revs, the 987.2 revs out very sweet and keeps making good power to red line, I think the 3.4 is more rewarding my self, but that's only my view.

A lot of dyno graphs have the GT4 peaking at 6.4k revs and the dip after that never recovers ! maybe the RAM air effect on the road works over dyno plots to show peak IS at 7.5k revs on the road.

I will Vbox both change points and see if taking the GT4 to 7.5k revs over 6.4k revs is worth it.


cobb lastest GT4 dyno peaking at 6.4k revs !!



Jens GT4 tuning program show the blue stock line again peaking at 6.4k revs, only a tune allows for the peak to move up the revs !



Edited by Porsche911R on Tuesday 29th March 12:24

J-P

Original Poster:

4,350 posts

207 months

Tuesday 29th March 2016
quotequote all
My car is due its 4 year service next month.

Any idea what the cost of this should be? It's the major one, so I'm expecting some damage to the wallet but hopefully not too much!

n17ves

591 posts

179 months

Tuesday 29th March 2016
quotequote all
[quote=Porsche911R]


I will Vbox both change points and see if taking the GT4 to 7.5k revs over 6.4k revs is worth it.

quote]

Seriously!? Even if the power did drop off at 6.4k (I don't believe it does from driving the thing), there is no way its efficient changing at 6.4k, you'd be dropping way down the power band.

Does anybody that actually has a GT4 on here actually drive the thing shoot

Porsche911R

21,146 posts

266 months

Tuesday 29th March 2016
quotequote all
peak Torque is at 4.5k revs so changing at 6.k revs drop you back nice in that Torque spread.

are you not looking at the dyno charts above !!!

the comments were the 3.4 revs out and makes power to red line the GT4 does not, hence the 3.4 is more fun to pilot.

You seem to think not, hence I posted the graphs to make a point, I think the GT4 engine feels a bit lazy myself where the 3.4 is a zingy fun unit.
The GT4 deserves the x51 upgrade imo lets hope the next one gets it.

the Vbox will be interesting imo.

Edited by Porsche911R on Tuesday 29th March 13:40

Porsche911R

21,146 posts

266 months

Tuesday 29th March 2016
quotequote all
J-P said:
My car is due its 4 year service next month.

Any idea what the cost of this should be? It's the major one, so I'm expecting some damage to the wallet but hopefully not too much!
Circa
£600 major
£195 Brake fluid
£200 AC refresh
£350 spark plugs.

Don't forget the MOT £55

there are talks to be had on costs of course and discounts.

n17ves

591 posts

179 months

Tuesday 29th March 2016
quotequote all
Porsche911R said:
peak Torque is at 4.5k revs so changing at 6.k revs drop you back nice in that Torque spread.

are you not looking at the dyno charts above !!!

the comments were the 3.4 revs out and makes power to red line the GT4 does not, hence the 3.4 is more fun to pilot.

You seem to think not, hence I posted the graphs to make a point, I think the GT4 engine feels a bit lazy myself where the 3.4 is a zingy fun unit.
The GT4 deserves the x51 upgrade imo lets hope the next one gets it.

the Vbox will be interesting imo.

Edited by Porsche911R on Tuesday 29th March 13:40
I did look at the dyno, but it doesn't represent the official Porsche one or indeed the way it drives. And as you said previously, Id question the validity of it.

You do know torque is simply the rotational force produced by the engine, and is in fact HP (force) that's delivered to the wheels - acceleration = force/mass (Basic physics rolleyes).

Anyway, I'm not here to argue stats. I'm more than happy with the GT4, and I would in no way would consider downgrading back to the R (as good car as it is). The GT4 is just better in everyway (apart from the electric handbrake & price tag!).



Porsche911R

21,146 posts

266 months

Tuesday 29th March 2016
quotequote all
n17ves said:
and I would in no way would consider downgrading back to the R (as good car as it is). The GT4 is just better in everyway (apart from the electric handbrake & price tag!).
I have just bought another R :-) as it happens , as I don't think the GT4 is better in every way , or if it is , not for the right reasons ! I think the R has a nice sweet spot for road use.

I don't see it as a downgrade at all, more a side ways step depending how you want a car to feel. both have big plus and minus points imo.

I have not sold the GT4 as I love that also, but I had to have another R it's a great platform.