The new 718 Gt4/Spyder are here!

The new 718 Gt4/Spyder are here!

Author
Discussion

Twinfan

10,125 posts

105 months

Thursday 11th June 2020
quotequote all
homerdog said:
Each to their own...
Indeed, and that's what matters most. I was just giving an alternative view to that given by RSVP911 and Kam 1 smile

I love a great exhaust noise as much as the next person, but I think its day on road cars is over.

Kam 1

99 posts

64 months

Thursday 11th June 2020
quotequote all
I did laugh out at your post and I think we’ve all been there and thought the same at some point. But it’s the drive by twice that makes that guy a nob. If it’s a lambo and it didn’t sound like that.. it’s not a proper lambo... Yes little hatchbacks with watermelon exhausts - look terrible and sound ste. I always think that, as do 99% I’d say.. But then if that’s their budget and they want some fun.. Each to their own.. from 2035 no more new ones. And the way the new Spyder sounds with the emission rules they will be a dying breed... 15 years to make the most of it!

Kam 1

99 posts

64 months

Thursday 11th June 2020
quotequote all
Porsche911R said:
"Porsche Admits The Cayman GT4’s Gearing Is Too Long"

Speaking with the man in charge of the Porsche 911 and 718 lines, Frank-Steffen Walliser, Which Car asked just why the GT4’s six-speed manual is geared so long.

"The gearbox we have, don’t get me wrong, it’s an old one"

" “We would have loved to have seen the gearing a little bit shorter, but technically there was no way"

their answer = The PDK will not only offer shorter gear ratios than the manual etc etc

shame this cars so close to being a winner, but like all models since 2015 the gearbox is flawed and really not acceptable on a £85k car.

No easy fix either which is a shame on the whole 981 range , S , GTs, GT4's and all the 718's manuals.
No only that now it's 4.0 it not fast due to it being torque limited as the poster above stated "no faster in the real world than the 981 SPyder 3.8"

The car would have been a stunner with a torque free lower ratio box.

ruined the GT4 for me.... in fact the whole 981 range has been disappointing with gen 1 EPS crap also, add in the gearbox issue and the cars pretty flawed product. passable on the 981 GT4 as it listed at £64k !!! unforgivable on the 718 GT cars imho at these much higher prices.

the GTS feels a rip off, but PDK will sort the issue, but make it uninteresting in other ways. but for me I dare to say it, PDK all the way on the new stuff.
A PDK GTS Boxster will be a great daily.

Edited by Porsche911R on Thursday 11th June 12:43
Interesting post and to hear someone from Porsche hold their hands up and admit it’s gearbox failings. I can only talk about the Spyder here but it does feel like they have strangled it and capped it - and the torque limiter explains things.

If anyone is reading this waiting for their delivery - don’t panic - am being real picky here - because it’s a bloody good car - really good. It just has so much more potential.
The last ones set the bar so high!

gpgts

143 posts

95 months

Thursday 11th June 2020
quotequote all
Kam 1 said:


Also slightly gutted they didn’t make it faster than the old one. I know it’s probably got the legs on it past 60 but I don’t think there’s much in it. Yes - its not about 0-60, it’s not about times, if you want that buy a turbo etc etc. But come on... they should have upped the anti a bit!! Even 0-60 in 4 would have been a nice improvement (and still kept it well out of reach of the 911 hierarchy!) I should have sorted that exhaust

Cheers
beer


Edited by Kam 1 on Thursday 11th June 12:28
Not quick enough? Here are testing specs from Car and Driver for new Spyder and Speedster. . I get it - magazine driver probably better than you and I. But the test result are from same magazine so let’s say apples to apples. Sub 4 for a manual car not quick enough? Everyone would like more speed but this is pretty damn impressive especially for car that was never intended to be a numbers car and when you look at bonkers quick supercars cars from the last decade - Carrara GT and Ford GT come mind -impressive indeed.


gpgts

143 posts

95 months

Thursday 11th June 2020
quotequote all
Spyder

GT4P

Original Poster:

5,215 posts

186 months

Thursday 11th June 2020
quotequote all
Standing quarter only 0.1 second slower than a car costing nearly 3x as much plus an extra 80hp with a "superior engine".
Does hold its own well!

Twinfan

10,125 posts

105 months

Thursday 11th June 2020
quotequote all
^ exactly. It's a great car IMHO, and nothing is perfect. Ideally it would have had a new gearbox and a bit more torque, but the current 'box is awesome to use and the car is quick enough so who really cares? It's a road car not a race car, and it's more about feel than outright speed - just like the 981 version was.

If you want faster, break into the piggy bank and buy a GT3. That's how Porsche play the game...

Kam 1

99 posts

64 months

Thursday 11th June 2020
quotequote all
This is American, so 0-60 figures, not 0-62 (not that it makes all that much difference.. )

But these guys also say:

“The Spyder makes the sprint to 60 mph in 3.8 seconds, which is a couple of ticks behind a Boxster GTS powered by a 365-hp turbocharged flat-four and equipped with the launch-control-enabled dual-clutch automatic transmission. But we're okay with trading stopwatch ticks for experience”

Couple of ticks behind... So a Boxster GTS at 3.6..
That’s GT3 territory?


https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.caranddriver.co...

Kam 1

99 posts

64 months

Thursday 11th June 2020
quotequote all
Yeah look I do agree - 100%
I was picking holes in a bloody good car. But I spent nearly £95 grand on it, could be better.
But that’s just my thoughts. And yep agreed if you want more, spend more

gpgts

143 posts

95 months

Thursday 11th June 2020
quotequote all
Twinfan said:
^ exactly. It's a great car IMHO, and nothing is perfect. Ideally it would have had a new gearbox and a bit more torque, but the current 'box is awesome to use and the car is quick enough so who really cares? It's a road car not a race car, and it's more about feel than outright speed - just like the 981 version was.

If you want faster, break into the piggy bank and buy a GT3. That's how Porsche play the game...
It is in GT3 territory - the one without a roof as noted in the specs above smile

Porsche911R

21,146 posts

266 months

Thursday 11th June 2020
quotequote all
Twinfan said:
^ exactly. It's a great car IMHO, and nothing is perfect. Ideally it would have had a new gearbox and a bit more torque, but the current 'box is awesome to use and the car is quick enough so who really cares? It's a road car not a race car, and it's more about feel than outright speed - just like the 981 version was.

If you want faster, break into the piggy bank and buy a GT3. That's how Porsche play the game...
if it were a race car the gearing would be ok, but it's a road car and people choose manual to get involved.

no need to be faster, it's about involvement (the act or process of taking part in something) and why I choose manuals, no good buying car you can leave in 3rd !! as it just makes for a dull drive.

the 718 brings nothing to the table as the gearbox was the 981 main disappointment.

yes the 4.0 revs higher but it's so torque limited(same as the 981 torque) its now the same 4.0l displacement as a GT3 but 40NM torque down and longer gearing.

the GT4 RS will be amazing by all accounts.

And on track the PDK GTS models will wee wee over 718 GT cars !!! now that's not right either !

Edited by Porsche911R on Thursday 11th June 14:57

Twinfan

10,125 posts

105 months

Thursday 11th June 2020
quotequote all
Just because you can leave it in third doesn't mean you have to. I change gear all the time in my car, as I'm sure many others do driving

Porsche911R

21,146 posts

266 months

Thursday 11th June 2020
quotequote all
Twinfan said:
Just because you can leave it in third doesn't mean you have to. I change gear all the time in my car, as I'm sure many others do driving
why ? be a bit daft changing into 4th at 40 mph, but what ever floats your boat I guess.

Twinfan

10,125 posts

105 months

Thursday 11th June 2020
quotequote all
Daft? Not at all if you're not treating the road like a race track.

gpgts

143 posts

95 months

Thursday 11th June 2020
quotequote all
For me, not one other major car company offers a new car like this - mid engine true manual NASP and convertible - unicorn! Bonus sub 4 secs to 60 if that’s important to you. Corvette finally made a ME car but binned the manual so I guess they could have joined Porsche but cited poor uptake on manual and cost. I suppose like Alpine 110 and Alfa 4C who also could have joined Porsche by ticking the boxes above. That leaves only Porsche willing to put in a manual box, despite having what many call the best automatic paddle shifter in the business. Kudos to Porsche - they still make a “throw back”sports car like this when no other company does. I commend them for it. Yes I would have loved a shorter gear ratio and more HP and torque - perhaps better sound (EU restrictions behind their control) but if they did that - good luck getting an allocation, heck it wasn’t easy getting one for this car - and you better dig deeper into your pockets because it wouldn’t be priced anywhere near this car.

Twinfan

10,125 posts

105 months

Thursday 11th June 2020
quotequote all
^ I totally agree. Only the MX-5 and Mustang can offer manual/NA/open top for a new car I think. The GT4 only has rivals in the GT86 and Mustang.

Porsche911R

21,146 posts

266 months

Thursday 11th June 2020
quotequote all
Twinfan said:
Daft? Not at all if you're not treating the road like a race track.
just a trinket for showing off at that point.

Don't call black/ white, the gearing is shocking awful on it and past models, worse in your old manual GTS with even less torques.

My golf's in 5th by the time a 981/718 in 3rd ffs. Go try a 458 you might be suprised how short they run the ratio's

Twinfan

10,125 posts

105 months

Thursday 11th June 2020
quotequote all
I couldn't care less about other cars, or what you think, quite frankly.

I love the manual 'box in the Cayster driving

Porsche911R

21,146 posts

266 months

Thursday 11th June 2020
quotequote all
Twinfan said:
I couldn't care less about other cars, or what you think, quite frankly.
That's a good job :-) we all buy and keep cars what we like, be daft to buy what some one else likes.
I would daily a 981 GT4 atm if it were £55k, still great cars, I just don't agree with the Mag and forum hype on some models, don't make them bad cars,
I would buy a 991.2 T at the right price,(was daft at rrp and overs) but there was only one car in the right spec at Romans and it's the only T which has sold, but £65k was my limit on it.

Some of the models get to a price point nothing comes close. but at retail atm some models have been taking the piss and not the value people say imho.
the 718 GT4 and manual Boxster GTS sit for me at "over priced" 718 Spyder's about the best value and the best current model again imho.

I cannot buy anything now any way have too many cars and need to move some on, but my next car will prob be that Evora GT 410.
better brakes, steering, weight, plus shorter ratio's and performance over the GT4 and £68k for a £110k list car. I need to get it out my system and give one ago, My last 3 modern porkers have been disapointing. (bar the GT3)

gpgts

143 posts

95 months

Thursday 11th June 2020
quotequote all
Twinfan said:
^ I totally agree. Only the MX-5 and Mustang can offer manual/NA/open top for a new car I think. The GT4 only has rivals in the GT86 and Mustang.
Agree but not mid engine which for me is the ultimate sports car.