Buying a hot rod air-cooled 911

Buying a hot rod air-cooled 911

Author
Discussion

Robbo66

3,834 posts

233 months

Wednesday 29th August 2018
quotequote all
Yellow491 said:
That car resembles a st as close as a 928 into a st is,the explanation of what st are also interesting and contradicts,may be info from a book or even worse internet/piston heads expert!
To build a accurate st or rsr that gets any where near the real deal is going to be closer to 200k today by the good guys such as autofarm or tutts etc
Looks nice though.
Totally agree. Mine took significant patience to get right as you know, built from certificated S shell, correct engine, pump, box and weighs 930kg wet. Neil took 9 months to sort engine and pushes 252bhp out of the 2.5lt. As close to a real ST as possible, but not at the £1.3m price tag for an original. There’s a plethora of hot rods out there which, as have been pointed out, appeal to a very niche market and difficult to sell on. For me personally, knocks the new stuff into a tin helmet.


IMI A

9,410 posts

201 months

Wednesday 29th August 2018
quotequote all
Amazing build Robbo. I seriously doubt yours would be difficult to sell on as shes so faithful to the original. Looks amazing and bet she flys. Green car still nice as a fun car to own but after seeing yours I'n even doubting my £80k arm chair valuation smile

skullcandy

Original Poster:

57 posts

68 months

Wednesday 29th August 2018
quotequote all
Thanks for all the input.

Robbo your car looks amazing. Is there a build thread/blog kicking around for her? Id love to read more

Fast Bug

11,689 posts

161 months

Wednesday 29th August 2018
quotequote all
Robbo66 said:
Totally agree. Mine took significant patience to get right as you know, built from certificated S shell, correct engine, pump, box and weighs 930kg wet. Neil took 9 months to sort engine and pushes 252bhp out of the 2.5lt. As close to a real ST as possible, but not at the £1.3m price tag for an original. There’s a plethora of hot rods out there which, as have been pointed out, appeal to a very niche market and difficult to sell on. For me personally, knocks the new stuff into a tin helmet.

That's gorgeous cloud9

Yellow491

2,923 posts

119 months

Wednesday 29th August 2018
quotequote all
Wicked car robbo,a 2.5 or 2.8 engine to original spec as in correct period parts will run you a min a cool 100k now.
Just put straight through megaphones on my 2.8 ready for brands hatch this weekend,40 special cars on display and a few laps.smile,cant wait for the drive by db meter.[url]
Big brother!
|https://thumbsnap.com/5muPYra6[/url]

Edited by Yellow491 on Wednesday 29th August 20:53

Robbo66

3,834 posts

233 months

Thursday 30th August 2018
quotequote all
IMI A said:
Amazing build Robbo. I seriously doubt yours would be difficult to sell on as shes so faithful to the original. Looks amazing and bet she flys. Green car still nice as a fun car to own but after seeing yours I'n even doubting my £80k arm chair valuation smile
Have some info here, mag ran article little while ago.





Just to caveat, doesn’t have to be period ‘beard’ spec to give you the thrills a well sorted 70’s aircooled can offer. If someone like Nick or Chris at CG has breathed on them, then they will be fantastic and often quicker as they will be running more modern electronics and higher BHP etc. Went to Alps last year with 2 and they are brilliantly sorted, quick cars. I think you just need to be careful as lots of B/S out there and you could easily be hoodwinked. Best secure services of well respected specialist, request they look over your prospective purchase before committing. Good luck with search.

Turn this up....

https://youtu.be/5N6Ei_OfcN4


Blackpuddin

16,523 posts

205 months

Thursday 30th August 2018
quotequote all
Longman66 said:
Thats way too much , had a major wobble last yr and almost sold mine for £49k , a 278 hp 1120 kilo modded 3.2 , had lots of interest and offers..
I would rather my mate Richards old car , properly sorted over many years of development..
https://www.pistonheads.com/classifieds/used-cars/...

Edited by Longman66 on Friday 24th August 20:46
Interested to note Richard's comments about standard 3.2 engines being 'lazy'. I bought a very nice '85 3.2 a few years back thinking it would satisfy my boyhood 911 dreams but it did seem exactly that, lazy. A perfect SC I'd driven earlier seemed a lot more energetic somehow.

AW10

4,437 posts

249 months

Thursday 30th August 2018
quotequote all
Slippydiff said:
it’s still a Cat D. And whilst it may have been a light tap on what was then a cheap car, it’s still on the register with the stigma that’s attached to it ...
I can't see Cat D being terribly relevant on a 30 year old car particularly when many of them have had extensive rust repair, some of them more than once. IMHO Cat D is relevant when there are multiple original "recent" cars available in similar condition and one is Cat D and the rest aren't. But after 30 years it's all just shades of patina. To steal a quote from the IB forum "there are no virgins in the bordello".

skullcandy

Original Poster:

57 posts

68 months

Thursday 30th August 2018
quotequote all
Steve Rance said:
To the OP. I think that it may be better to hot rod a 911 whilst retaining it’s identity: ie if it’s a 993 or 964, retaining the silhouette and not trying to make it into a car it isn’t. In that way the car retains its effective integrity whilst still exhibiting an element of individuality. All air cooled 911’s have huge character already.
Completely agree Steve. It seems as if anyone commissioning a back-date these days has to acknowledge from the start that they will never see that money back. I like the idea of a completely standard looking car but with a wicked engine in the back

IMI A

9,410 posts

201 months

Thursday 30th August 2018
quotequote all
Blackpuddin said:
Longman66 said:
Thats way too much , had a major wobble last yr and almost sold mine for £49k , a 278 hp 1120 kilo modded 3.2 , had lots of interest and offers..
I would rather my mate Richards old car , properly sorted over many years of development..
https://www.pistonheads.com/classifieds/used-cars/...

Edited by Longman66 on Friday 24th August 20:46
Interested to note Richard's comments about standard 3.2 engines being 'lazy'. I bought a very nice '85 3.2 a few years back thinking it would satisfy my boyhood 911 dreams but it did seem exactly that, lazy. A perfect SC I'd driven earlier seemed a lot more energetic somehow.
Mine wasn’t lazy at all. I found it as quick as my 964 C2 when keeping her above 4000rpm. Loved my old 3.2 Carrera

IMI A

9,410 posts

201 months

Thursday 30th August 2018
quotequote all
Robbo66 said:
IMI A said:
Amazing build Robbo. I seriously doubt yours would be difficult to sell on as shes so faithful to the original. Looks amazing and bet she flys. Green car still nice as a fun car to own but after seeing yours I'n even doubting my £80k arm chair valuation smile
Have some info here, mag ran article little while ago.





Just to caveat, doesn’t have to be period ‘beard’ spec to give you the thrills a well sorted 70’s aircooled can offer. If someone like Nick or Chris at CG has breathed on them, then they will be fantastic and often quicker as they will be running more modern electronics and higher BHP etc. Went to Alps last year with 2 and they are brilliantly sorted, quick cars. I think you just need to be careful as lots of B/S out there and you could easily be hoodwinked. Best secure services of well respected specialist, request they look over your prospective purchase before committing. Good luck with search.

Turn this up....

https://youtu.be/5N6Ei_OfcN4
Sounds nuts!!!

Yellow491

2,923 posts

119 months

Thursday 30th August 2018
quotequote all
Robbo66 said:
IMI A said:
Amazing build Robbo. I seriously doubt yours would be difficult to sell on as shes so faithful to the original. Looks amazing and bet she flys. Green car still nice as a fun car to own but after seeing yours I'n even doubting my £80k arm chair valuation smile
Have some info here, mag ran article little while ago.





Just to caveat, doesn’t have to be period ‘beard’ spec to give you the thrills a well sorted 70’s aircooled can offer. If someone like Nick or Chris at CG has breathed on them, then they will be fantastic and often quicker as they will be running more modern electronics and higher BHP etc. Went to Alps last year with 2 and they are brilliantly sorted, quick cars. I think you just need to be careful as lots of B/S out there and you could easily be hoodwinked. Best secure services of well respected specialist, request they look over your prospective purchase before committing. Good luck with search.

Turn this up....

https://youtu.be/5N6Ei_OfcN4
Darrens car comes to mind! Great little car.
Trouble is a lot of dealers are riding on the back of what the real cars are in there sales bs,yet the car they are selling has no bareing on the real deal,yet the price tag is getting close to a very good authentic as you can make it rep.

Gary C

12,441 posts

179 months

Thursday 30th August 2018
quotequote all
Blackpuddin said:
Interested to note Richard's comments about standard 3.2 engines being 'lazy'. I bought a very nice '85 3.2 a few years back thinking it would satisfy my boyhood 911 dreams but it did seem exactly that, lazy. A perfect SC I'd driven earlier seemed a lot more energetic somehow.
Odd, mine comes alive above 4k

skullcandy

Original Poster:

57 posts

68 months

Thursday 30th August 2018
quotequote all
Lovely, lovely car Robbo. Sounds epic.

What are the seats in yours out of interest and how comfortable are they please?

Also do you have the last section of that article? I really enjoyed it anyway, thanks very much for posting it

Onetrackmind

813 posts

213 months

Friday 31st August 2018
quotequote all
For me, the appeal of a hotrod is that it’s a bit rough around the edges. Magnus Walker’s ex-track day SC was a good base as it’s was mechanically sound but a little rough in the body. Customise it to your own taste and then drive it like you stole it. I’d also only bother going hotrod if it’s going to be a keeper. Unless, that is, money is no object!

I’d look towards the states or Japan for a hotrod or decent base, if you don’t mind LHD. They’re far more willing to hotrod cars than the UK market. Pelican Parts forum is a good start for the US

Slippydiff

14,830 posts

223 months

Friday 31st August 2018
quotequote all
AW10 said:
I can't see Cat D being terribly relevant on a 30 year old car particularly when many of them have had extensive rust repair, some of them more than once. IMHO Cat D is relevant when there are multiple original "recent" cars available in similar condition and one is Cat D and the rest aren't. But after 30 years it's all just shades of patina. To steal a quote from the IB forum "there are no virgins in the bordello".
I wasn’t suggesting that it being Cat D would impact on its desirability per se, more it would impact on it’s asking price ... smile
Come resale time, I suspect many (most ?) would shy away from buying a Cat D car over a non Cat D car that has had extensive corrosion repairs if they were the same price ?

g7jhp

6,964 posts

238 months

Saturday 1st September 2018
quotequote all
The Cat D classification is marked on the V5C registration document for life and will affect the cars future resale value and saleability, therefore is should be reflected in the current price.

It doesn't matter how well the car has been repaired or that it happened 20 years ago.

IMI A

9,410 posts

201 months

Saturday 1st September 2018
quotequote all


cloud9

Thats lovely Yellow. My 12 yr old son built one of these a few years ago - bit smaller mind - he'll be at Brands tomorrow with his his Mother in her Gulf Blue 991 turbo. Both Porsche daft wobble









jonny finance

926 posts

206 months

Saturday 1st September 2018
quotequote all
Marvellous topic, thread and input.


911-32

85 posts

223 months

Monday 3rd September 2018
quotequote all
Given I am the RB that used to own "RB's hot rod", I would be more than happy to answer any questions about the car. I venture I know a tad more about it after 16 yrs of owning it than one or 2 others. I (clearly) have no dog in this fight other than a little sentimental attachment, so I can be pretty candid.

I wrote the advert when I sold it a year ago and the current owner (a nice chap BTW and a real car enthusiast who has owned some pretty decent Pork and lots of other cool cars) has re-used the copy. He is reluctantly selling due to a change in circumstance. It is a fantastic car if you like real, raw, air cooled old stuff. It delivers some massive highs and for the last 10 years was used almost exclusively on the road and pretty low miles. At the risk of the commentators curse, its bulletproof. It's like the farmer's axe - everything was replaced on the car with a view to making it reliable on long trips. And BTW, it sold for a lot more than whoever suggested £30k as a realistic value. Yes, it appeals to a limited market, but £30k would barely buy you an engine plus a set 8/9x16 inch Fuchs these days.

Last thought for now, I don't pretend to know the technicalities, but I think the right description for the car is "condition inspected", which is different from Cat D. Yes/No? I had it condition inspected by Autolign, so I think its off the register. I may be wrong. I disclosed it all when I sold in any event to avoid confusion.