Which Porsche would you modify/hot rod and why?

Which Porsche would you modify/hot rod and why?

Author
Discussion

Cunno

511 posts

158 months

Saturday 17th October 2020
quotequote all
CarreraLightweightRacing said:
Funny you mention this, I weighed it the other day and it came as follows:

FL- 196.3kg FR- 191kg Front total 387.6kg
RL- 370.8kg RR-376.9kg Rear total 747.7kg

Total: 1135kg or 1101kg dry.

This is however fully carpeted, all trim and 4 seats/seat belts... so another 44kg potential which would mean a theoretical 1057kg is possible and still be road legal. Also I haven't trimmed much out of the wiring harnesses. So my feeling is somewhere is the region of 1050kg (dry) 1083.5kg (wet but no fuel) is possible.
Thanks Richard

Good to see you have weighed car now and confirmed the deductions, and that is a lite 996.

Has anyone got a real on the road weight for a 997 GT3 comfort please. Mines a real poker 1495 kg and that’s with a Kline exhaust and manifolds Recaro buckets + half cage and 3/4 tank of fuel no driver.
Since then done liteblox battery, removed air bags (all) rear and side window Perspex, removed radio, sat nav, amp, speakers and added OZ alloys. So another 59 kg saving that’s about 1430 kg ( TBC) only 35kg heavier than Porsche claim WTF!

Harris_I

3,228 posts

260 months

Saturday 17th October 2020
quotequote all
Orangecurry said:
apart from
CarreraLightweightRacing said:
Screenwash fluid drained -1kg
Off topic. That reminds me when I was club racing, fuel was always the minimum needed to finish.

I remember once waiting on the grid, thinking I wasn't happy with the fuel level and maybe I needed another 5 litres. An hour later, I spluttered to an ignominious halt on the last lap whilst in.... P1. D'oh!!

BrewsterBear

1,507 posts

193 months

Sunday 18th October 2020
quotequote all
I've had a few old 911s over the years. This one was a very tired, very rattly, mildly rusty 1982 3.0SC when I bought it a decade ago.



I didn't set out to "backdate" it as such in order to copy a particular model, but I wanted a more classic look and more modern performance. I cherrypicked bits from throughout the Porsche back catalogue; trims from the 60's, panels from the early 70's, seat's from the early 90's, engine from a Varioram 993 and a few custom bits thrown in too. If it's there it's because I like it that way, regardless of whether a man with a clipboard and an adenoidal voice thinks it should be.

It now weighs a smidge under 1100kg and has a smidge over 300bhp. I have other cars that would show it a clean pair of heels, but it's fast enough to be involving and brings a smile every time I take it out. It cost me well under 6-figures to build, including the car which was bought at a time when you could get an MoT'd, driving, aircooled 911 for less than an engine these days.














CarreraLightweightRacing

2,011 posts

210 months

Sunday 18th October 2020
quotequote all
BrewsterBear said:
I've had a few old 911s over the years. This one was a very tired, very rattly, mildly rusty 1982 3.0SC when I bought it a decade ago.

I didn't set out to "backdate" it as such in order to copy a particular model, but I wanted a more classic look and more modern performance. I cherrypicked bits from throughout the Porsche back catalogue; trims from the 60's, panels from the early 70's, seat's from the early 90's, engine from a Varioram 993 and a few custom bits thrown in too. If it's there it's because I like it that way, regardless of whether a man with a clipboard and an adenoidal voice thinks it should be.

It now weighs a smidge under 1100kg and has a smidge over 300bhp. I have other cars that would show it a clean pair of heels, but it's fast enough to be involving and brings a smile every time I take it out. It cost me well under 6-figures to build, including the car which was bought at a time when you could get an MoT'd, driving, aircooled 911 for less than an engine these days.

Well played Sir, beautiful car and the pictures are top draw. A decade of hard work to now be savored and enjoyed wink

Slippydiff

14,850 posts

224 months

Sunday 18th October 2020
quotequote all
BrewsterBear said:
I've had a few old 911s over the years. This one was a very tired, very rattly, mildly rusty 1982 3.0SC when I bought it a decade ago.

I didn't set out to "backdate" it as such in order to copy a particular model, but I wanted a more classic look and more modern performance. I cherrypicked bits from throughout the Porsche back catalogue; trims from the 60's, panels from the early 70's, seat's from the early 90's, engine from a Varioram 993 and a few custom bits thrown in too. If it's there it's because I like it that way, regardless of whether a man with a clipboard and an adenoidal voice thinks it should be.

It now weighs a smidge under 1100kg and has a smidge over 300bhp. I have other cars that would show it a clean pair of heels, but it's fast enough to be involving and brings a smile every time I take it out. It cost me well under 6-figures to build, including the car which was bought at a time when you could get an MoT'd, driving, aircooled 911 for less than an engine these days.
Exhaust not my thing, but everything else about it is absolutely stunning.
Consider my hat well and truly doffed to you sir.

THAT, is a Porsche hotrod. cloud9

smile

Steve Rance

Original Poster:

5,447 posts

232 months

Sunday 18th October 2020
quotequote all
Lovely. I really appreciate a car that has been built with a clear picture of the outcome rather than something that incorporates the catalogue of one tuner.

I think that It’s the eclectic nature of these cars that makes them so nice.

BrewsterBear

1,507 posts

193 months

Sunday 18th October 2020
quotequote all
Cheers guys. The exhaust seems the most divisive part of the car. I really like it, but I get that it might look jarring compared to what people expect to be poking out of the back of an old 911.

Slippydiff

14,850 posts

224 months

Sunday 18th October 2020
quotequote all
If it's any consolation, I'm not a fan of the items Singer use either smile

Singer's design should really ape the originals (IMO) in both size and spacing :



Either fabricated from some nice thickwall stainless steel (brushed) or the same but ceramic coated in the colour of your choice (within reason ...)

Edited by Slippydiff on Sunday 18th October 19:37

BrotherMouzone

3,169 posts

175 months

Sunday 18th October 2020
quotequote all
Cunno said:
Thanks Richard

Good to see you have weighed car now and confirmed the deductions, and that is a lite 996.

Has anyone got a real on the road weight for a 997 GT3 comfort please. Mines a real poker 1495 kg and that’s with a Kline exhaust and manifolds Recaro buckets + half cage and 3/4 tank of fuel no driver.
Since then done liteblox battery, removed air bags (all) rear and side window Perspex, removed radio, sat nav, amp, speakers and added OZ alloys. So another 59 kg saving that’s about 1430 kg ( TBC) only 35kg heavier than Porsche claim WTF!
That’s interesting to read cos a while ago another PHer had his 996.2 GT3 weighted at CG and it came in at 1380kg which was exactly the same as the Porsche’s claimed weight. And his car had the heavy leather ‘sofas’ (no cage but unsure of fuel level).

BrotherMouzone

3,169 posts

175 months

Sunday 18th October 2020
quotequote all
Heathrow said:
Forgot to add: Surface Transforms Ceramics!
Ohhhhh are they available for 996.2 now? My car has Alcons steel and they are fantastic but if there are lighter alternative that’d be worth investigating when it’s time for replacement.

BrotherMouzone

3,169 posts

175 months

Sunday 18th October 2020
quotequote all
BrewsterBear said:
What a lovely car. I remember reading about it somewhere; might even be here on PH.

Steve Rance

Original Poster:

5,447 posts

232 months

Tuesday 20th October 2020
quotequote all
Question for early aircooled Car experts. What’s the recognised route for chassis/suspension tuning?

Heathrow

450 posts

131 months

Tuesday 20th October 2020
quotequote all
BrotherMouzone said:
Ohhhhh are they available for 996.2 now? My car has Alcons steel and they are fantastic but if there are lighter alternative that’d be worth investigating when it’s time for replacement.
Not yet apparently.

Porsche911R

21,146 posts

266 months

Tuesday 20th October 2020
quotequote all
Steve Rance said:
Question for early aircooled Car experts. What’s the recognised route for chassis/suspension tuning?
https://820b2c84-e8dc-402d-ad24-321ece67e5d4.filesusr.com/ugd/d37546_c4d5d3cc48074048a8b3cb526b1d43fc.pdf

BrewsterBear

1,507 posts

193 months

Tuesday 20th October 2020
quotequote all
Steve Rance said:
Question for early aircooled Car experts. What’s the recognised route for chassis/suspension tuning?
In the UK? Take it to Center Gravity, explain what you would like from the car, drive away very happy with a lighter wallet.

VonSenger

2,465 posts

190 months

Tuesday 20th October 2020
quotequote all
BrewsterBear said:
I've had a few old 911s over the years. This one was a very tired, very rattly, mildly rusty 1982 3.0SC when I bought it a decade ago.



I didn't set out to "backdate" it as such in order to copy a particular model, but I wanted a more classic look and more modern performance. I cherrypicked bits from throughout the Porsche back catalogue; trims from the 60's, panels from the early 70's, seat's from the early 90's, engine from a Varioram 993 and a few custom bits thrown in too. If it's there it's because I like it that way, regardless of whether a man with a clipboard and an adenoidal voice thinks it should be.

It now weighs a smidge under 1100kg and has a smidge over 300bhp. I have other cars that would show it a clean pair of heels, but it's fast enough to be involving and brings a smile every time I take it out. It cost me well under 6-figures to build, including the car which was bought at a time when you could get an MoT'd, driving, aircooled 911 for less than an engine these days.













That's bite the back of your hand beautiful. Stunning.

Kettmark

903 posts

154 months

Wednesday 21st October 2020
quotequote all
[quote=CarreraLightweightRacing]Good to see you back posting on PH Steve wink
If I was to go crazy with another Pork flavoured project I'd be taking a 997.1C2S, giving it the Sport Classic look, removing all BS and 200kg, then fit a 4.0l engine, that should make quite an interesting proposition.


I've gone this route, minus the 4.0 engine (unless mine goes pop)

Kettmark

903 posts

154 months

Wednesday 21st October 2020
quotequote all
An internal pic

Needs some more alcantara on door cards, dash & leavers. Anyone got an alcantara gearknob surplus to requirements please?

D.no

706 posts

213 months

Wednesday 21st October 2020
quotequote all
Cunno said:
Thanks Richard

Good to see you have weighed car now and confirmed the deductions, and that is a lite 996.

Has anyone got a real on the road weight for a 997 GT3 comfort please. Mines a real poker 1495 kg and that’s with a Kline exhaust and manifolds Recaro buckets + half cage and 3/4 tank of fuel no driver.
Since then done liteblox battery, removed air bags (all) rear and side window Perspex, removed radio, sat nav, amp, speakers and added OZ alloys. So another 59 kg saving that’s about 1430 kg ( TBC) only 35kg heavier than Porsche claim WTF!
Mines a comfort-spec, with A/C, Nav etc.

Last time I had it corner-weighted, the figures came out as follows:
Total weight: 1545.5Kg with 76Kg driver, and 1/2 tank of fuel. Porky by name....

Cheib

23,274 posts

176 months

Wednesday 21st October 2020
quotequote all
Kettmark said:
CarreraLightweightRacing said:
Good to see you back posting on PH Steve wink
If I was to go crazy with another Pork flavoured project I'd be taking a 997.1C2S, giving it the Sport Classic look, removing all BS and 200kg, then fit a 4.0l engine, that should make quite an interesting proposition.


I've gone this route, minus the 4.0 engine (unless mine goes pop)
I like the idea of a 4.0 engine. Addresses the ordinary (In context of the rest of the car) part of the Sport Classic....the drivetrain.