Abusive Trolls and Bigots

[anonymous-user]

We have been left to our own devices (see also, the fix needed for the last visit glitch that haymarket have basically said will never be fixed)

Apart from mods inconsistently removing and deleting threads, we are on our own, you need to learn and ignore people.

[anonymous-user]

loose cannon said:

Fermit The Krog and Sexy Sarah said:

rallycross said:

4x4Tyke said:

How long are the mods going to allow abusive trolls and bigots to run riot?

They infested NP&E long ago and are now branching out into other sections with their harassment of the posters prepared to stand up to them.

Trolling, abuse and off-topic posts are supposed to be against the rules.

Edited by 4x4Tyke on Thursday 19th October 21:52

You sound like an idiot.

A point in case. You don't know this person, never interacted with them, yet your opening reply is a baseless insult. Please feel free to fk off.

Yet 3 posts above your opening post about Santa barbera was fk right off
Pot and kettle spring to mind,

A thread about abuse, descends into abuse.

[wst]

Every now and again I venture into NP&E. Pointless really. Unless you're a sycophant things degrade into childishness and name calling. It's really quite pathetic how childish even powerfully build company directors can be when they're proven wrong.

[Harry Biscuit]

wst said:

Every now and again I venture into NP&E. Pointless really. Unless you're a sycophant things degrade into childishness and name calling. It's really quite pathetic how childish even powerfully build company directors can be when they're proven wrong.

To be fair though, from what I read in one thread, your posts were rather irksome.

Irrespective of who started what.

No offence

[wst]

Oh I wasn't being particularly tactful or spoon feeding some of the self-professed geniuses with superior education and social standing, no. I prefer people to do their research (as you have) rather than just having a knee jerk reaction to something because of who specifically said what

Lesson learned though. It's like Mos Eisley Spaceport in there.

[Johnnytheboy]

I think defining disagreeing with people as "proving them wrong" on matters some would class as subjective may be why you haven't got a wholly positive reaction, without knowing to which threads you refer.

[wst]

Johnnytheboy said:

I think defining disagreeing with people as "proving them wrong" on matters some would class as subjective may be why you haven't got a wholly positive reaction, without knowing to which threads you refer.

See "assuming, the debate". That was actually the thing I was was referring to.