Avatar's / Signature pics

Avatar's / Signature pics

Author
Discussion

hugh_

Original Poster:

3,550 posts

242 months

Monday 1st May 2006
quotequote all
Ted is there any chance we could have avatars or signature pics? It would be nice to try and keep the forums as neet and good looking as it is now so maybe best to go for one or t'other rather than both!

Does anyone else have any opinions on this?

Plotloss

67,280 posts

271 months

Monday 1st May 2006
quotequote all
Been discussed a few times, I think that, in the name of page layout and maintaining the clean lines that both are not likely to appear anytime soon.

SamHH

5,050 posts

217 months

Monday 1st May 2006
quotequote all
I like things as they are. It would start to get cluttered if avatars and signatures were added. Besides, you can always put a pic in your profile.

Andy Mac

73,668 posts

256 months

Monday 1st May 2006
quotequote all
Nice as it is...

sstein

6,249 posts

255 months

Monday 1st May 2006
quotequote all
PH does NOT need avatars / signature pics etc.

It makes the site slower for people on dial-up and looks cluttered.

Its fine as it is IMO.

-

Stuart

iluvmercs

7,541 posts

228 months

Monday 1st May 2006
quotequote all
sstein said:
PH does NOT need avatars / signature pics etc.

Its fine as it is IMO.

-

Stuart


I agree

Darren

hugh_

Original Poster:

3,550 posts

242 months

Monday 1st May 2006
quotequote all
I agree that one of the nice things about this site is how clean it looks. However if you were to limit a sig. to say 60pixels high, and say 10kb then it wouldnt have a great affect on loading times, something like this for example.

Polarbert

17,923 posts

232 months

Monday 1st May 2006
quotequote all
NOOOOOO! This is such a better forum due to the lack of them. Lets keep it that way.


Some of the signatures on the m5board don't half make me laugh.

Trooper2

6,676 posts

232 months

Monday 1st May 2006
quotequote all
Plotloss said:
Been discussed a few times, I think that, in the name of page layout and maintaining the clean lines that both are not likely to appear anytime soon.



That was a very diplomatic way of saying.....not while PetrolTed is alive..

c c

7,890 posts

240 months

Monday 1st May 2006
quotequote all
Plotloss said:
Been discussed a few times, I think that, in the name of page layout and maintaining the clean lines that both are not likely to appear anytime soon.


Good.

madazrx7

4,881 posts

218 months

Monday 1st May 2006
quotequote all
Please Ted don't change the layout to add sigs and avatars!
Some other forums I look at (less and less since I found PH) you get a 2 or 3 word comment followed by 10 lines of repeated drivel, sometimes it's hard to find the actual post

2c Tim

Pigeon

18,535 posts

247 months

Monday 1st May 2006
quotequote all
Good job Ted's dead against it... saves me the hassle of knocking up a script to strip them out again

Sigs are a lot worse than avatars but they're both pretty annoying and get in the way of reading the forum. And even 10k-limited ones would add up to 400k on a full page which would be a total arseache for dialup users.

hugh_

Original Poster:

3,550 posts

242 months

Monday 1st May 2006
quotequote all
madazrx7 said:
you get a 2 or 3 word comment followed by 10 lines of repeated drivel, sometimes it's hard to find the actual post

2c Tim


Hence why I was suggesting a single sig limitted to say 60 pixels in height, I also hate long blurbs some users have on other forums hence why I wasnt suggesting it. However a single, small, tasteful signature pic can look really good IMO.

This thread was intended to guage reaction to the idea and we obviously have a very clear answer to what the majority want, so that is fine!

r5gttgaz

7,897 posts

221 months

Monday 1st May 2006
quotequote all
Id say NO to sigs and avatars, as said before the pages get very cluttered and the actual post gets lost between them.

Is this what you want?

gorvid

22,233 posts

226 months

Monday 1st May 2006
quotequote all
Whats the point in signatures - the name is at the side

Whats the point in pictures - profiles have pictures....

hugh_

Original Poster:

3,550 posts

242 months

Monday 1st May 2006
quotequote all
r5gttgaz said:
Id say NO to sigs and avatars, as said before the pages get very cluttered and the actual post gets lost between them.

Is this what you want?



That sort of thing, but its too big because that would clutter the page, but keeping them half the size it isnt an issue

mrsmadmark

3,545 posts

224 months

Monday 1st May 2006
quotequote all
NO NO NO NO I cant stand them, I think they are annoying and look messy, IMHO

DocJock

8,361 posts

241 months

Monday 1st May 2006
quotequote all
Hugh, are you not getting the message yet that nobody else wants them ?

Mrs Fish

30,018 posts

259 months

Monday 1st May 2006
quotequote all
DocJock said:
Hugh, are you not getting the message yet that nobody else wants them ?



He has stated above that he acknowledges that the majority don't want them


I love the site as it is, even if the avatars were small, it still makes the forum look messy. Luckily Ted feels the same way

Karen182

4,214 posts

235 months

Monday 1st May 2006
quotequote all
I don't like signatures but I do prefer avatars, I tend to scroll down and it's easier to pick out posts from people you find interesting and avoid others, just small avatars, neat and useful imo.