The Senna P1

Author
Discussion

Streetrod

Original Poster:

6,468 posts

206 months

Saturday 27th June 2015
quotequote all
This has to be one of the best looking P1's so far. Here are a couple of pics I took at the FOS today, these do not do the car justice:








Muzzer79

9,989 posts

187 months

Saturday 27th June 2015
quotequote all
I'm afraid I think it's a bit.......tacky

That 'autograph' on the rear wing is vomit

Mermaid

21,492 posts

171 months

Saturday 27th June 2015
quotequote all
Muzzer79 said:
I'm afraid I think it's a bit.......tacky

That 'autograph' on the rear wing is vomit
I agree, leave him alone, his memory is fine as it is. And yet, I am sure some collector will pay a few million for this chintz.

cgt2

7,101 posts

188 months

Sunday 28th June 2015
quotequote all
Surely if any car has a claim to the great man's legacy it would be the new NSX?

Senna had very little to do with the McLaren F1 project and Jonathan Palmer did most of the work as by that point Senna was on the outs with the team (race by race contract in 1993).

In fact the only thing I can recall was him being present at the Monaco launch (with the early high wing mirror prototype).

Pioneer

1,309 posts

131 months

Sunday 28th June 2015
quotequote all
Muzzer79 said:
I'm afraid I think it's a bit.......tacky

That 'autograph' on the rear wing is vomit
+1

DuraAce

4,240 posts

160 months

Sunday 28th June 2015
quotequote all
Gash. Very tacky. I'm sure they'll sell it though!

andyferrari

61 posts

165 months

Sunday 28th June 2015
quotequote all
Guys don't jump to too many conclusions. I saw the car and the paint job looks stunning.
Mclaren haven't cribbed Ayrton Senna's name.
This P1 has been specifically built and finished to order to the purchasers taste.


Edited by andyferrari on Sunday 28th June 10:19

anonymous-user

54 months

Sunday 28th June 2015
quotequote all
colour scheme is fine

spoilt by the singature imo

cho

927 posts

275 months

Sunday 28th June 2015
quotequote all
I thought that everything to do with Senna was controlled by his foundation especially his signature. Unless the buyer paid a bit of money to the foundation. Anyway, agree with others that it's a bit tacky. No real association with Mclaren road car development and was driving for Williams already I think

flemke

22,865 posts

237 months

Sunday 28th June 2015
quotequote all

Mermaid

21,492 posts

171 months

Sunday 28th June 2015
quotequote all
flemke said:
Bold, is that yours?

lauda

3,479 posts

207 months

Sunday 28th June 2015
quotequote all
flemke said:
I saw that on the McLaren stand on Friday. I'm guessing you've posted the picture as an example of another tacky colour scheme but I really quite liked it getmecoat

flemke

22,865 posts

237 months

Sunday 28th June 2015
quotequote all
lauda said:
flemke said:
I saw that on the McLaren stand on Friday. I'm guessing you've posted the picture as an example of another tacky colour scheme but I really quite liked it getmecoat
I posted it as an example of a related driver tribute livery. It is possible that both legacy cars were done to the brief of the same owner....

I usually try to avoid criticising what someone has done to his/her pride-and-joy. Without criticising the "Senna" version, let's say that the "Prost" version works much better, as in much better. That was my point in posting: same idea, different outcome.

Fwiw, I would say that in the flesh the "Senna" version looks no better than it does in images, but the "Prost" version def does look better. The way the blue works against and contrasts with the white is good - much like it was on the original helmet.

br d

8,402 posts

226 months

Sunday 28th June 2015
quotequote all
flemke said:
lauda said:
flemke said:
I saw that on the McLaren stand on Friday. I'm guessing you've posted the picture as an example of another tacky colour scheme but I really quite liked it getmecoat
I posted it as an example of a related driver tribute livery. It is possible that both legacy cars were done to the brief of the same owner....

I usually try to avoid criticising what someone has done to his/her pride-and-joy. Without criticising the "Senna" version, let's say that the "Prost" version works much better, as in much better. That was my point in posting: same idea, different outcome.

Fwiw, I would say that in the flesh the "Senna" version looks no better than it does in images, but the "Prost" version def does look better. The way the blue works against and contrasts with the white is good - much like it was on the original helmet.
Agreed, that does look more coherent. As other posters have pointed out the signature on the Senna just spoils it, really tacky on a thing of such beauty.

cgt2

7,101 posts

188 months

Sunday 28th June 2015
quotequote all
The Professor definitely wins this round..!

gunner

709 posts

230 months

Sunday 28th June 2015
quotequote all
Agreed...the Prost car is really very beautiful in the flesh.

Flemke,as an F1 owner and Mclaren officianado can I please ask what do you think of the P1?

flemke

22,865 posts

237 months

Sunday 28th June 2015
quotequote all
gunner said:
Agreed...the Prost car is really very beautiful in the flesh.

Flemke,as an F1 owner and Mclaren officianado can I please ask what do you think of the P1?
Things I don't like about the car are, mainly, the extra weight owing to the electric gimmicks, the width, and the complexity of operation/controls. There are a few other niggles, but that is the gist.

Things I do like are braking power and feel, precision (although not returnability) of steering, lateral grip, acceleration, chassis balance and predictability, and looks. Driver ergonomics are exceptional: it's so comfy in there that you don't want to leave even if you're parked. Ride is good, although not as extraordinary as some seem to think.

Build quality fine, but not as good as Veyron and prob not quite as good as 918, although much better than LaF.

Overall it is a fantastic machine, although, like most "supercars", its range of applications is frustratingly narrow.



Streetrod

Original Poster:

6,468 posts

206 months

Sunday 28th June 2015
quotequote all
OK I am happy to agree that the signature on the wing is probably not in the best taste but in the flesh the paint job really pops, my camera tends to wash out colours a bit. Personally I would be more that happy to drive around in this P1, also I much preferred it to the Prost car

duka

429 posts

220 months

Monday 29th June 2015
quotequote all
flemke said:
It is possible that both legacy cars were done to the brief of the same owner....
correct - I saw the pair at MSO few months back - Senna vehicle better in the flesh.

flemke

22,865 posts

237 months

Monday 29th June 2015
quotequote all
Streetrod said:
This has to be one of the best looking P1's so far. Here are a couple of pics I took at the FOS today, these do not do the car justice:







This is how that colour scheme should be done:




The reason that the helmet design works is that, although the majority of surface is yellow, the areas of green and blue are large, simple in shape, and equal in size. Unfortunately, none of those adjectives can be applied to the car. Indeed, from any distance there appears to be no blue at all. An aggravating factor is that the curves of the stripes are discontinuous.

I'm not saying that the shape of the P1 lends itself to the geometric layout of the wide stripes on the helmet, but, to make that scheme work on the car, the situation called for something much closer to the feel of the helmet. Alternatively, it might have worked with something totally different from the helmet. Either way, the design needs more green, and a lot more blue.

The main reason, I would suggest, that in real life the car paint "pops out" is because McLaren used a clean yellow with a lot of pearl (IIRC) in it. In itself, that's great, and the green stripes help to provide contrast and lift the yellow further.

One just wishes that they had gone for something other than a few tentative stripes around the edges.

If, for example, they had done the big green-yellow-blue bands across the side of the car, or possibly in the large aero recess of the side, that would have been more cohesive, more consistent with the helmet, and overall prob better looking.