Dyson EV

Author
Discussion

Dave Hedgehog

14,569 posts

205 months

Thursday 10th October 2019
quotequote all
wow what a surprise ... not

anyone who has followed Tesla has seen the insane amounts of money you need to setup global manufacturing of cars at scale


anonymous-user

55 months

Thursday 10th October 2019
quotequote all
Very sad my brother has spent last 6 months in Singapore with with Dyson on the proposed supplychain solution, now all down the drain..

Witchfinder

6,250 posts

253 months

Thursday 10th October 2019
quotequote all
If I recall correctly, Dyson were claiming commercially viable solid state batteries by 2025. I wonder if this is also now canned, or if the research will continue separately. Or if it was a load of poppycock.

Frimley111R

15,677 posts

235 months

Thursday 10th October 2019
quotequote all
I can't help thinking that the brand just does not work for cars. 'I drive the new Dyson.' You can hear the vacuum cleaner jokes already.

anonymous-user

55 months

Thursday 10th October 2019
quotequote all
Frimley111R said:
I can't help thinking that the brand just does not work for cars. 'I drive the new Dyson.' You can hear the vacuum cleaner jokes already.
Yes.

As they say, “Suck it up, Sir James”..

anonymous-user

55 months

Thursday 10th October 2019
quotequote all
still working on solid state batteries and other stuff

https://www.dyson.co.uk/automotive.html

cybersimon

199 posts

170 months

Thursday 10th October 2019
quotequote all
Do you suppose that there could be more money in just the solid state batteries, that they probably know about, rather than in a whole motor car that they probably don't.

Much sense in playing to strenghts

anonymous-user

55 months

Thursday 10th October 2019
quotequote all
cybersimon said:
Do you suppose that there could be more money in just the solid state batteries, that they probably know about, rather than in a whole motor car that they probably don't.

Much sense in playing to strengths
Very much so, and the exact point i made 3 years ago when the project first broke cover. ie that it's insane to make your own car just because you can do one single bit of it!


Witchfinder

6,250 posts

253 months

Thursday 10th October 2019
quotequote all
Anyone who cracks energy dense, commercially competitive solid state batteries will have a licence to print money.

hidetheelephants

24,463 posts

194 months

Friday 11th October 2019
quotequote all
Witchfinder said:
Anyone who cracks energy dense, commercially competitive solid state batteries will have a licence to print money.
Whereas making 4-wheeled personal transportation is a low-margin/high volume business with extortionate entry costs. Not a difficult commercial decision.

sausage76

353 posts

124 months

Friday 11th October 2019
quotequote all
If they crack solid sate then good on them

its a long way off yet though on an industrial scale.

skwdenyer

16,524 posts

241 months

Tuesday 19th May 2020
quotequote all
Obviously cancelled, but interesting to see it revealed:

https://www.engadget.com/dysons-electric-car-n526-...

Given the 600 mile range and necessary £150k price (could Dyson not have sold carbon credits like Tesla to tip that balance?), I do wonder how much the price could have been dropped for less range from those solid state batteries?

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

255 months

Tuesday 19th May 2020
quotequote all
I think he wanted to build an affordable car but couldnt compromise and ended up with an unsalable white elephant.

Cut his losses before investing billions into a factory and supply chain that wouldnt have (enough) customers.

aestetix1

868 posts

52 months

Wednesday 20th May 2020
quotequote all
Sounds like he is lying about it anyway. 600 mile range, so either it has a literal tonne of batteries or he invented some revolutionary new battery that he is now keeping to himself instead of mass producing and raking in the cash.

A lot of the other stuff he said about it is clearly nonsense too, like the "floating dashboard". He means it had a HUD like many other cheap cars already do.

If he really had this car which he could sell profitably at £150k he would be mad not to do it. People pay that much for a top spec Tesla and it would lead to developing cheaper models.

EddieSteadyGo

11,976 posts

204 months

Wednesday 20th May 2020
quotequote all
aestetix1 said:
If he really had this car which he could sell profitably at £150k he would be mad not to do it. People pay that much for a top spec Tesla and it would lead to developing cheaper models.
It's ironic that you would make this comment when we are entering what will be most serious global economic depression in our lifetime.

And the number of people paying £150k for a car is minuscule.

skwdenyer

16,524 posts

241 months

Wednesday 20th May 2020
quotequote all
aestetix1 said:
Sounds like he is lying about it anyway. 600 mile range, so either it has a literal tonne of batteries or he invented some revolutionary new battery that he is now keeping to himself instead of mass producing and raking in the cash.

A lot of the other stuff he said about it is clearly nonsense too, like the "floating dashboard". He means it had a HUD like many other cheap cars already do.

If he really had this car which he could sell profitably at £150k he would be mad not to do it. People pay that much for a top spec Tesla and it would lead to developing cheaper models.
(1) he does have "revolutionary new battery" tech
(2) we don't know what *volume* would be needed to even make it at £150k - if that volume is greater than the addressable market then there's no business case.

shalmaneser

5,936 posts

196 months

Wednesday 20th May 2020
quotequote all
skwdenyer said:
aestetix1 said:
Sounds like he is lying about it anyway. 600 mile range, so either it has a literal tonne of batteries or he invented some revolutionary new battery that he is now keeping to himself instead of mass producing and raking in the cash.

A lot of the other stuff he said about it is clearly nonsense too, like the "floating dashboard". He means it had a HUD like many other cheap cars already do.

If he really had this car which he could sell profitably at £150k he would be mad not to do it. People pay that much for a top spec Tesla and it would lead to developing cheaper models.
(1) he does have "revolutionary new battery" tech
(2) we don't know what *volume* would be needed to even make it at £150k - if that volume is greater than the addressable market then there's no business case.
I'm not sure these batteries are sufficiently revolutionary that he could offer a 600 mile range. That would be quite extraordinary and he's not shown off anything with double the energy density of existing offerings as far as I know.

What this may turn out to be is a good tech demonstrator. I image there are a number of smaller car companies sniffing around this tech with a view to integrating it into their near future lineups. If I worked at Mazda, Mitubishi or Subaru I might be very interested in this secret sauce.

WestyCarl

3,265 posts

126 months

Wednesday 20th May 2020
quotequote all
RobDickinson said:
I think he wanted to build an affordable car but couldnt compromise and ended up with an unsalable white elephant.
There was never any intention to build an affordable car. It was planned as low volume expensive car.

anonymous-user

55 months

Wednesday 20th May 2020
quotequote all
skwdenyer said:
(1) he does have "revolutionary new battery" tech
.
"Revolutionary new battery tech" is very much like perpertual motion machines! Lots of people claim lots of things, none have actually ever managed to cash in.


Like Perpetual motion, if you actually had a volume production viable battery with twice the current energy density you could literally walk un-announced straight into the board room of any OE in the work, show them what you have, and walk out with a blank cheque. And yet, that hasn't happened.......