New addition to the forum?

Author
Discussion

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

255 months

Monday 30th December 2019
quotequote all
I'm not closed minded at all, if hydrogen was a good local short term overflow storage system it would be in use, yet its all lithium or flow batteries etc.

jjwilde

1,904 posts

97 months

Monday 30th December 2019
quotequote all
Richard-D said:
Your response is typical of what I would expect. Doesn't know, doesn't consider, can't be bothered, closed mind. Standard for people who can't or won't see past EVs being a single solution so dismisses everything else instantly without thought.
No. Hydrogen is a dead end tech. It's like saying we may as well use video tapes again instead of the internet. I mean you could make an argument for that and it would be about as silly and wasteful.

jamoor

14,506 posts

216 months

Monday 30th December 2019
quotequote all
The smartest use of hydrogen that I have seen is for installing remote charging stations. Instead of wiring it up on a remote hillside in Wales, just install a hydrogen tank and use it to make electricity to charge cars.

coetzeeh

2,650 posts

237 months

Monday 30th December 2019
quotequote all
Richard-D said:
Hydrogen production makes sense at locations that have wind farms. Hydrogen produced on windy days at times of low grid demand. It's fantastic if employed cleverly, inefficient and polluting if using energy produced in fossil fuel power stations. Don't get hung up on thinking there has to be a single solution.
Probably the reason Germany is persuing Hydrogen. There is so much Wind and Solar installed I have seen negative intraday energy prices in the market on a hot windy summers day. Austria another good example where 70% of generation is Hydro.



jjwilde

1,904 posts

97 months

Monday 30th December 2019
quotequote all
jamoor said:
The smartest use of hydrogen that I have seen is for installing remote charging stations. Instead of wiring it up on a remote hillside in Wales, just install a hydrogen tank and use it to make electricity to charge cars.
Or just do what Tesla do and use battery banks and it's much cheaper, safer and easier to maintain. No Hydrogen explosions which is how that set up was shut down in Norway.

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

255 months

Monday 30th December 2019
quotequote all
This is why for short term energy storage no one is going to use hydrogen commercially. You can't throw away 65% of your product


coetzeeh

2,650 posts

237 months

Monday 30th December 2019
quotequote all
jjwilde said:
jamoor said:
The smartest use of hydrogen that I have seen is for installing remote charging stations. Instead of wiring it up on a remote hillside in Wales, just install a hydrogen tank and use it to make electricity to charge cars.
Or just do what Tesla do and use battery banks and it's much cheaper, safer and easier to maintain. No Hydrogen explosions which is how that set up was shut down in Norway.
Li-ion not without its issues as Tesla have discovered first hand. Stacked in any material number it presents serious fire and explosive risks - in data centre environment for example you are unable to insure unless contained externally and some distance from site.
Li-ion fires have caused cargo aircraft to burn and crash - carriage now restricted by FAA for example.

Hydrogen is evolving - Germany and Japan are renowned for innovation and supreme engineering, both nations investing and exploring solutions.

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

255 months

Monday 30th December 2019
quotequote all
coetzeeh said:
Li-ion not without its issues as Tesla have discovered first hand. Stacked in any material number it presents serious fire and explosive risks - in data centre environment for example you are unable to insure unless contained externally and some distance from site.
Li-ion fires have caused cargo aircraft to burn and crash - carriage now restricted by FAA for example.

Hydrogen is evolving - Germany and Japan are renowned for innovation and supreme engineering, both nations investing and exploring solutions.
lolz

https://www.smh.com.au/business/companies/huge-tes...

Edited by RobDickinson on Monday 30th December 19:58

Europa Jon

555 posts

124 months

Monday 30th December 2019
quotequote all
Safety is one thing, but I haven't found any evidence of a commercially viable liquid hydrogen production plant using renewables and electrolysis. Hydrogen is currently produced from fossil fuels in the commercial sector at present, which is a convenient thing to forget when raving about its eco-credentials.

coetzeeh

2,650 posts

237 months

Monday 30th December 2019
quotequote all
RobDickinson said:
coetzeeh said:
Li-ion not without its issues as Tesla have discovered first hand. Stacked in any material number it presents serious fire and explosive risks - in data centre environment for example you are unable to insure unless contained externally and some distance from site.
Li-ion fires have caused cargo aircraft to burn and crash - carriage now restricted by FAA for example.

Hydrogen is evolving - Germany and Japan are renowned for innovation and supreme engineering, both nations investing and exploring solutions.
lolz

https://www.smh.com.au/business/companies/huge-tes...

Edited by RobDickinson on Monday 30th December 19:58
I guess you noticed the batteries are out in the sticks smile keep up at the back.

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

255 months

Monday 30th December 2019
quotequote all
and powerwall isnt , so?

gangzoom

6,314 posts

216 months

Saturday 4th January 2020
quotequote all
Any updates from the OP on real life usage/range/refueling??

coetzeeh

2,650 posts

237 months

Saturday 4th January 2020
quotequote all
RobDickinson said:
and powerwall isnt , so?
Powerwall size is miniscule in context, hence..

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

255 months

Saturday 4th January 2020
quotequote all
hence what? you were blabering about safety

dvs_dave

8,646 posts

226 months

Saturday 4th January 2020
quotequote all
coetzeeh said:
jjwilde said:
jamoor said:
The smartest use of hydrogen that I have seen is for installing remote charging stations. Instead of wiring it up on a remote hillside in Wales, just install a hydrogen tank and use it to make electricity to charge cars.
Or just do what Tesla do and use battery banks and it's much cheaper, safer and easier to maintain. No Hydrogen explosions which is how that set up was shut down in Norway.
Li-ion not without its issues as Tesla have discovered first hand. Stacked in any material number it presents serious fire and explosive risks - in data centre environment for example you are unable to insure unless contained externally and some distance from site.
Li-ion fires have caused cargo aircraft to burn and crash - carriage now restricted by FAA for example.

Hydrogen is evolving - Germany and Japan are renowned for innovation and supreme engineering, both nations investing and exploring solutions.
Wait, you’re citing li-on batteries as a serious fire/explosion risk compared to tanks of explosive gas stored on site/in a vehicle at 10,000+ PSI?

Try transporting tanks of hydrogen on an aircraft and see what the FAA have to say about that.

Also, try getting insurance (if you can even get anyone bonkers enough to build it in the first place) on a hydrogen fuel cell UPS system for a data center facility that is even remotely commercially viable.

laugh

coetzeeh

2,650 posts

237 months

Saturday 4th January 2020
quotequote all
dvs_dave said:
coetzeeh said:
jjwilde said:
jamoor said:
The smartest use of hydrogen that I have seen is for installing remote charging stations. Instead of wiring it up on a remote hillside in Wales, just install a hydrogen tank and use it to make electricity to charge cars.
Or just do what Tesla do and use battery banks and it's much cheaper, safer and easier to maintain. No Hydrogen explosions which is how that set up was shut down in Norway.
Li-ion not without its issues as Tesla have discovered first hand. Stacked in any material number it presents serious fire and explosive risks - in data centre environment for example you are unable to insure unless contained externally and some distance from site.
Li-ion fires have caused cargo aircraft to burn and crash - carriage now restricted by FAA for example.

Hydrogen is evolving - Germany and Japan are renowned for innovation and supreme engineering, both nations investing and exploring solutions.
Wait, you’re citing li-on batteries as a serious fire/explosion risk compared to tanks of explosive gas stored on site/in a vehicle at 10,000+ PSI?

laugh
I never made a comparison of the sort?

jjwilde

1,904 posts

97 months

Sunday 5th January 2020
quotequote all
coetzeeh said:
Hydrogen is evolving - Germany and Japan are renowned for innovation and supreme engineering, both nations investing and exploring solutions.
Hydrogen is not evolving. Hydrogen is hydrogen - a stty energy store riddled with issues which are not going away.

donkmeister

8,220 posts

101 months

Sunday 5th January 2020
quotequote all
I love the idea of hydrogen, not least because you can have ICEs running off it, so V8s can live on.

My OH did some stuff with a BMW hydrogen project 10-15 years ago and one of the physical constraints preventing usefulness was boil-off as the fuel was stored cryogenically. Park up before a 2 week holiday, and when you return the tank is essentially empty.

Presumably the 700 bar tank of gaseous hydrogen on this doesn't need to vent in normal circumstances?

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

255 months

Sunday 5th January 2020
quotequote all
No, it's not chilled though it will leak some?

Burning hydrogen in am ice is even worse than fuel cell, afik the hydrogen powered rx8 made half the power also.

Dave Hedgehog

14,570 posts

205 months

Monday 6th January 2020
quotequote all
coetzeeh said:
Li-ion not without its issues as Tesla have discovered first hand. Stacked in any material number it presents serious fire and explosive risks - in data centre environment for example you are unable to insure unless contained externally and some distance from site.
Li-ion fires have caused cargo aircraft to burn and crash - carriage now restricted by FAA for example.

Hydrogen is evolving - Germany and Japan are renowned for innovation and supreme engineering, both nations investing and exploring solutions.
they only people pushing hydrogen is the big Japanese and German car makers, i guess they prefer a car model that keeps the service centres busy