Mercedes EQC ordered

Author
Discussion

unseen

Original Poster:

169 posts

161 months

Wednesday 19th August 2020
quotequote all
The boot is 500l so big enough for most families I would say

zadumbreion

1,049 posts

220 months

Sunday 23rd August 2020
quotequote all
Be interesting to compare notes when you've had a couple of weeks with the EQC

unseen

Original Poster:

169 posts

161 months

Sunday 23rd August 2020
quotequote all
Will do. So far so good!

Frimley111R

15,663 posts

234 months

Tuesday 15th September 2020
quotequote all
Question: How fast can it charger from AC? I assume it is 7.4kW as that is the speed of the onboard converter but some sites say it can charge at 11kW or 22kW??

dmsims

6,523 posts

267 months

Tuesday 15th September 2020
quotequote all
Higher AC speeds are 3 phase

Frimley111R

15,663 posts

234 months

Tuesday 15th September 2020
quotequote all
dmsims said:
Higher AC speeds are 3 phase
Yes, that's for the charger itself but it's a bit irrelevant if the on board converter is only rated at 7.4kW

Adam1980

137 posts

73 months

Sunday 18th October 2020
quotequote all
Mine arrives on Thursday, really looking forward to it!

dazmanultra

432 posts

92 months

Monday 19th October 2020
quotequote all
Test driving an EQC tomorrow. Any thoughts from current owners?


650spider

1,476 posts

171 months

Tuesday 20th October 2020
quotequote all
Out of nowhere, I am all of a sudden interested in one of these.

Bizarre part is we were planning on replacing our GLS63 AMG with the new version when it comes out, but have had a full 180* turn and thinking about going from full fat offensive motor straight to full electric bypassing hybrid completely.

We are getting a 48hr demo in a few weeks time; shall post how I find it and if we decide thats how we shall proceed.

Are current owners impressed, and what genuine real world range do you get?

RichardAP

276 posts

42 months

Thursday 22nd October 2020
quotequote all
650spider said:
Out of nowhere, I am all of a sudden interested in one of these.

Bizarre part is we were planning on replacing our GLS63 AMG with the new version when it comes out, but have had a full 180* turn and thinking about going from full fat offensive motor straight to full electric bypassing hybrid completely.

We are getting a 48hr demo in a few weeks time; shall post how I find it and if we decide thats how we shall proceed.

Are current owners impressed, and what genuine real world range do you get?
We got one 3 weeks ago and after 700 miles I can safely say my wife loves it. She does c35 miles a day, town and fast B road driving, and the computer says she is getting 2.5mpKwh. She had a Macan Turbo performance previously and although technically that was faster the eqc feels quicker off the line due to the way it delivers the power.

Plus it looks nice in blue with the 21inch wheels and has the latest MB tech.

Estimated range is getting longer from when we picked it up but I think that just reflects its prediction. We are still waiting for the charger to be installed but if we plug it into a normal plug overnight it is full by the morning. If you need more than that every day you will need the 7kw charger otherwise range anxiety does kick in. Haven’t planned a long journey yet but I guess that will be stressful until you get used to it.

So far we would definitely recommend one, especially if you can put it through a business.

jason61c

5,978 posts

174 months

Thursday 22nd October 2020
quotequote all
so home costs at 14p/kwh = 35 pence per mile, equal to 16mpg at 118pence per ltr

motorway at 30p/kwh= 75 pence per mile, equal to 7mpg!

ooooofh!

RichardAP

276 posts

42 months

Thursday 22nd October 2020
quotequote all
jason61c said:
so home costs at 14p/kwh = 35 pence per mile, equal to 16mpg at 118pence per ltr

motorway at 30p/kwh= 75 pence per mile, equal to 7mpg!

ooooofh!
I think you have your maths the wrong way round. It’s 2.5 miles per 14p, so sub 6p

anonymous-user

54 months

Thursday 22nd October 2020
quotequote all
jason61c said:
so home costs at 14p/kwh = 35 pence per mile, equal to 16mpg at 118pence per ltr

motorway at 30p/kwh= 75 pence per mile, equal to 7mpg!

ooooofh!
No no. 2.5 miles per kWh at 14p per kWh is 5.6p per mile. At 118p per litre of fuel this is 96mpg.

At 30p per kWh, it’s now 54mpg

dmsims

6,523 posts

267 months

Thursday 22nd October 2020
quotequote all
You could get that down to 2p a mile

SWoll

18,378 posts

258 months

Thursday 22nd October 2020
quotequote all
jason61c said:
so home costs at 14p/kwh = 35 pence per mile, equal to 16mpg at 118pence per ltr

motorway at 30p/kwh= 75 pence per mile, equal to 7mpg!

ooooofh!
rofl

Based on your maths the range would be < 30 miles from an 80kWh battery.

Edited by SWoll on Thursday 22 October 15:23

jason61c

5,978 posts

174 months

Thursday 22nd October 2020
quotequote all
hahaha.

I did make a bit of a mistake there. I was surprised when looking!!

Just had a google and ionity is 79p per kwh!? 31.6 ppm


Edited by jason61c on Thursday 22 October 16:51

aestetix1

868 posts

51 months

Thursday 22nd October 2020
quotequote all
RichardAP said:
She does c35 miles a day, town and fast B road driving, and the computer says she is getting 2.5mpKwh.
I expected it to be efficient because parts of the drivetrain were from Tesla but apparently not. That's close to worst-in-class, only really rivalled for poor efficiency by the Audi Turd, sorry e-Tron.

It's not got some kind of fault has it? Stuck brake perhaps? Tyres under-inflated?

unseen

Original Poster:

169 posts

161 months

Thursday 22nd October 2020
quotequote all
I'm about 800 miles in to my life with the EQC (due to WFH) and it's been great so far. Range estimates in the car seem to vary between 200 - 250 miles, you can eke out the range by putting it in eco mode and putting it in Auto brake regen (D Auto) but I never bother to be honest.

The driving assistance / tech systems in it are great as is the MBUX interface; I think you could get straight out of an E class or GLC / GLE and immediately feel at home in one (unlike say a Tesla which would take a bit of adjustment). I've had lots of compliments on the car's looks (brilliant blue / 21 inch wheels) and the light bar at the front looks quite cool imo.

The only negative from my experience to date is that the ground clearance due to the battery is pretty low so I need to take it slowly over speed bumps, etc. It is certainly not something you should be looking to take off-road - in fact it is quite a lot more low slung than most SUV (better aerodynamics I guess). Check out the 4 squared concept version though on portal axles it looks fab (see YouTube).

I'll be interested to see what the colder temps do to the range and 've just got some winter wheels for it so obviously it won't snow now!

RichardAP

276 posts

42 months

Thursday 22nd October 2020
quotequote all
jason61c said:
hahaha.

I did make a bit of a mistake there. I was surprised when looking!!

Just had a google and ionity is 79p per kwh!?
I think it’s 69p now, if you don’t have a contract, but as with petrol & diesel there will always be cheap and expensive options. So far everything we have done has been at home apart from 1 top up at Starbucks which was 35p per kWh plus 2 coffees....so ultimately it’s down to personal circumstances. We can charge at home, so it’s cheap, if you can get free charging at work even better, if you are always topping up on the motorway it may (will) be expensive.

We didn’t do it to get cheap fuel per se, it was getting a nice everyday car in a tax efficient way, and it certainly fits that bill.

RichardAP

276 posts

42 months

Thursday 22nd October 2020
quotequote all
aestetix1 said:
RichardAP said:
She does c35 miles a day, town and fast B road driving, and the computer says she is getting 2.5mpKwh.
I expected it to be efficient because parts of the drivetrain were from Tesla but apparently not. That's close to worst-in-class, only really rivalled for poor efficiency by the Audi Turd, sorry e-Tron.

It's not got some kind of fault has it? Stuck brake perhaps? Tyres under-inflated?
Not sure what your source is, it looks better than What Cars test (quoted 2.2) and that of the Tesla model s (2.4). So, no I don’t think there is anything wrong and it’s certainly more economical than her previous Macan and as the alternative is driving her DB11 AMR I think it’s got that beat on economy too.