Golf GTI Skoda CitiGo. Wise move?

Golf GTI Skoda CitiGo. Wise move?

Author
Discussion

BREMBOV6

Original Poster:

499 posts

149 months

Tuesday 22nd January 2019
quotequote all
Jimi.K. said:
I believe there's a saying along the lines of "the cheapest car to run is the one you've already got"

People love justifying a new car purchase because a new one will do 5mpg more or cost them £100 a year less to tax, but unless your current car is unreliable or horrendously uneconomical (neither of which seem to apply here) you'll almost certainly be financially better off keeping it. I suspect a citigo will feel like a bit of a step down in comfort and refinement compared to your golf as well.
Perhaps correct but the Golf is gone and felt it was slightly wasted on me. Was doing c.250 miles a week on a low mileage car in not very enjoyable traffic parking in a car park then coming out and finding a new ding or mark which was pis$ing me off. Gutted as it is a cracking low mileage Mk5, 3 door, manual. Few issues but nothing major. Was needing brakes all round pretty soon but was putting £30 fuel in and getting 150 miles.

I am pleased with what I got for it being a private sale, I was top end of the market in the price range. Anyway HOPING to get a lot more MPG's, not see money going out on road tax every month and not be fussed with small marks, condition and for it to be worthwhile.... I thought buying your first place/flat was supposed to be fun!


was8v

1,937 posts

196 months

Tuesday 22nd January 2019
quotequote all
smart roadster

gashead1105

560 posts

154 months

Tuesday 22nd January 2019
quotequote all
I sold an Edition 30 GTi (which I found boring and souless but my wife loved) and bought a stigo in an attempt to be sensible (had something silly in the garage). It lasted 3 months. Hateful gutless engine with a tiny fuel tank, dangerously slow if you came up behind an idiot in an audi doing 40 on a sliproad and an awful, awful condensation problem (which they all have apparently). Hated it.

I replaced it with a Mk 7 Fiesta ST, which I only sold last year to pay for some building work. I want another one!

BREMBOV6

Original Poster:

499 posts

149 months

Tuesday 22nd January 2019
quotequote all
What are the thoughts on a Volvo C30? The DRIVEe in particular?

Silenoz

860 posts

154 months

Tuesday 22nd January 2019
quotequote all
OP, based on what you have outlined as your requirements:

http://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/2018...

Panda TwinAir, £0 road tax and interesting engine with decent spec.

http://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/2018...

Citroen C1 1.2, new shape so a nicer spec

http://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/2018...

Seat Mii i-tech, as you mentioned a CitiGo, same car underneath

http://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/2018...

And an actual CitiGo!

remould

52 posts

180 months

Wednesday 23rd January 2019
quotequote all
If you want small and fun and can park it without worrying how about a Panda 100HP ?,2-3K will get you one, i loved mine just a shame the dog didn't !

BREMBOV6

Original Poster:

499 posts

149 months

Thursday 24th January 2019
quotequote all
More great shouts, Fiat Panda 100hp seems good but seem scarce with low miles.

Keep looking at the Volvo C30 one at the moment one up at £4,200 1.6 eDRIVE, 52k miles, private sale in R Design spec. 2010. Seems a lot of car for the money, would like to think I could possibly get a few hundred off. Seems timing belt done recently too. Not sure if going off piste slightly and if a diesel is a good idea however....

BREMBOV6

Original Poster:

499 posts

149 months

Thursday 24th January 2019
quotequote all
BREMBOV6 said:
More great shouts, Fiat Panda 100hp seems good but seem scarce with low miles.

Keep looking at the Volvo C30 one at the moment one up at £4,200 1.6 eDRIVE, 52k miles, private sale in R Design spec. 2010. Seems a lot of car for the money, would like to think I could possibly get a few hundred off. Seems timing belt done recently too. Not sure if going off piste slightly and if a diesel is a good idea however....

Checking MOT above Volvo has done almost 16k miles in a year not a turn off I don't think

The Cardinal

1,274 posts

253 months

Thursday 24th January 2019
quotequote all
Having now sold the Golf, I would be looking to get something that minimise depreciation. Buying privately in the £0-5k range is probably a reasonably safe place, assuming you now pick wisely.

I say this because I suspect that you could suffer a relapse into the condition of a true petrolhead. The more boring your next car, the greater the chance of this happening I say. wink

Personally, I recommend you now get something that is at least a bit special to you - perhaps a little project; something that you might enjoy spending a little time and effort to bring it up to scratch.

As food for thought: there are several other VAG models that share the 2.0 TFSI drivetrain, which are also a fair bit cheaper than the Mk5 GTI. I'm currently smoking around in a nicely spec'd 2007 A3 2.0T, which expect cost me at least 50% less than you sold your GTI for.

Yes, something like this will take more cash to run, but once near-zero depreciation is taken into account you will probably find it costs the same or less than some of your other ideas...

BREMBOV6

Original Poster:

499 posts

149 months

Friday 25th January 2019
quotequote all
Should have kept hold of the Golf perhaps if for depreciation.

Couple more cars that I have come across and welcome thoughts!

Ford Puma 1.7 imagine rust may well be an issue and road tax £100+ but its up for £500! 65k miles, 8 months MOT.

VW Passat 2010 2.0 TDI in R Line spec with 70k miles good service history up at £4,200

VW Polo 1.2 TSI (105PS) 50k miles up at £4,000

All private sales but all fall outside £30 road tax but think seems good car for the money....

The Cardinal

1,274 posts

253 months

Friday 25th January 2019
quotequote all
Those are three quite different cars! I think this depends on what your priorities are.

The Polo should give the greatest chance of lower running costs, although - as definitely will be the case with the other two - this depends on what the condition of the car really is. I would allow some budget for repairs and maintenance as there's always a reason for someone deciding to sell...and especially the Puma.

Happily, as I said earlier, all three should see little depreciation.

BREMBOV6

Original Poster:

499 posts

149 months

Friday 25th January 2019
quotequote all
Thanks.

Indeed all very different, basically sold the Golf with a very vague idea of what I was going too do next, now I seem to be looking at everything.... even came across an old MGB GT spin

Car-Matt

1,923 posts

139 months

Friday 25th January 2019
quotequote all
I'd be in a Twingo 133

Already depreciated, more fun than a barrel of monkeys, great size for a city car. Not worth a lot either so who cares if it gets a ding or two

browna

334 posts

184 months

Friday 25th January 2019
quotequote all
id say test drive a swift sport or a twingo 133, for the limited miles you do a small super fun car is defo the way to go, very minimal extra costs to a more mundane small city car. and gonna be newer and cheaper to run that the old gti. I was sold on my swift sport after the first roundabout on the test drive.

Blanchimont

4,076 posts

123 months

Friday 25th January 2019
quotequote all
What's with the £30 tax obsession?


You'll spend more in tax filling the car up once (maybe twice depending on the cars tank)

My rough maths indicate that:

57.95 pence per litre is tax
+ 20% vat on the total in fuel. Roughly £1.20 a litre.

1.20-20% = 96p - 57.95 = 38p.

1.20 x 45 (litres) = £54

38p x 45 = £17.10 in raw fuel costs.

£54 - £17.10 = £36.90.

2 tanks of fuel are more than a years tax, at £30.






BREMBOV6

Original Poster:

499 posts

149 months

Monday 28th January 2019
quotequote all
Blanchimont said:
What's with the £30 tax obsession?


You'll spend more in tax filling the car up once (maybe twice depending on the cars tank)

My rough maths indicate that:

57.95 pence per litre is tax
+ 20% vat on the total in fuel. Roughly £1.20 a litre.

1.20-20% = 96p - 57.95 = 38p.

1.20 x 45 (litres) = £54

38p x 45 = £17.10 in raw fuel costs.

£54 - £17.10 = £36.90.

2 tanks of fuel are more than a years tax, at £30.
Not sure I follow. Instead of paying £30 a month on road tax I will potentially pay £30 a year....appreciate tax on fuel but not much I can do about that.

White Fiat Panda 100HP I'm going to try and look at, in white, dealer and just below 60k miles.

Looked at a VW Up! at the weekend, up at £4,300 at main VW dealership, 44k miles. Was close to going for it but just not sure, more nippy than I thought.

Got messed about buy a guy on Gumtree, was a nice spec Yaris, 64 plate low mileage up at £4k mark asked the general questions HPI clear etc turned up and it had a replacement service book with what I believe to be his writing inside then on the V5 'salvaged vehicle' total time waster. Light on the dash which was the 'tyre pressure' full of cr@p

Keeping an eye out for a Twingo 133 too

Feirny

2,521 posts

148 months

Monday 28th January 2019
quotequote all
BREMBOV6 said:
Keeping an eye out for a Twingo 133 too
Got my 133 on Saturday, feels like a slower mini 182, absolute riot.

BREMBOV6

Original Poster:

499 posts

149 months

Monday 28th January 2019
quotequote all
Feirny said:
Got my 133 on Saturday, feels like a slower mini 182, absolute riot.
Enjoy! sounds good, is this the facelift?....let me know what its like on fuel!

I was possibly going to have a look at a Mini Cooper 2007, 1.6 but not sure running costs will be noticeable cheaper than that of the Golf. Looks a very clean car, with nice low mileage (30k mark)

Feirny

2,521 posts

148 months

Monday 28th January 2019
quotequote all
BREMBOV6 said:
Enjoy! sounds good, is this the facelift?....let me know what its like on fuel!

I was possibly going to have a look at a Mini Cooper 2007, 1.6 but not sure running costs will be noticeable cheaper than that of the Golf. Looks a very clean car, with nice low mileage (30k mark)
Nah it's the pre facelift, wanted to spend as little as possible.


Trevor555

4,457 posts

85 months

Monday 28th January 2019
quotequote all
BREMBOV6 said:
I was possibly going to have a look at a Mini Cooper 2007, 1.6 but not sure running costs will be noticeable cheaper than that of the Golf. Looks a very clean car, with nice low mileage (30k mark)
I couldn't recommend the Mini, seen far too many large repair bills.