Elon Musk ordered Tesla software to be optimistic on range

Elon Musk ordered Tesla software to be optimistic on range

Author
Discussion

Register1

2,151 posts

95 months

Friday 28th July 2023
quotequote all
Not really overstating at all.
Our M3 RWD (2023) was rated at 272 miles.
Wife can easily get 320+ in these warmer months.

TheDeuce

21,865 posts

67 months

Friday 28th July 2023
quotequote all
kevinon said:
Musk boasts of making x (RIP twitter) the 'everything app' including banking facilities. Hmm. Customers and partners need to trust a business to hand over that much power.

I'm out.

The Reuters story seems totally in keeping with Musk's MO. Check the source: https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-repor...

Quote:

"Jonathan Elfalan, vehicle testing director for the automotive website Edmunds.com, reached a similar conclusion to Pannone after an extensive examination of vehicles from Tesla and other major automakers, including Ford, General Motors, Hyundai and Porsche.

All five Tesla models tested by Edmunds failed to achieve their advertised range, the website reported in February 2021. All but one of 10 other models from other manufacturers exceeded their advertised range"
That's all irrelevant. It doesn't matter even if Tesla do give their range guides more optimistically than others.

All that matters is that the car supplied is as tested on the WLTP cycle and that they don't claim it can do more than on that cycle. That's it - so long as that is true, there is nothing more to answer to.

If a person doesn't like Tesla/musk as a result of this, don't buy their cars. None of this is news or lawsuit worthy though.

Why is everyone so frothy and desperate for drama these days confused



DMZ

1,407 posts

161 months

Saturday 29th July 2023
quotequote all
I'm assuming it has nothing to do with WLTP (which is a worthless metric anyhow) but that they have setup the range prediction in the car to be very optimistic. I have always assumed Tesla would do that because people like to repeat those numbers online while never really checking their accuracy so a great marketing tool and virtually no downsides to it. Given that Tesla market their cars on two things, range and 0-60, they will do everything they can to make those two numbers look good at all times. Like being able to launch once to hit a low 0-60 number and fudging with the range prediction.

otolith

56,311 posts

205 months

Saturday 29th July 2023
quotequote all
Range estimate displayed on the dashboard with a full tank/charge being somewhat optimistic is par for the course isn’t it?

DMZ

1,407 posts

161 months

Saturday 29th July 2023
quotequote all
Yeah but many EVs do a good job with it for route planning purposes. You kinda need to get that reasonably right at the start of the journey. Telling me I have 50% more range than I actually have isn’t great when I’m stuck in the middle of nowhere with a dead EV.

I don’t think it’s a big deal re Tesla, by the way. They always seem to get the most stick.

Flooble

5,565 posts

101 months

Monday 31st July 2023
quotequote all
From what I remember on tests between 2014 and 2020, the Tesla's used to be closest to their stated range. I remember the hilarity of Nissan stating with a straight face that a 24kWh Leaf could do 124 miles (more like 80).

I feel like this is just another round of the Musk-bashing that has currently become fashionable. It's really rather boring to be honest.

I had hoped that maybe once there was a Democrat in the White House and Trump was gone we'd see a reduction in the polemics; ah well maybe next year when Labour will be in power in the UK we might see the Social Media mob pile-ons calm down.

otolith

56,311 posts

205 months

Monday 31st July 2023
quotequote all
Just to be clear, this isn't a question of the official WLTP/EPA test ranges being gamed, this is about what the dashboard displays the estimated range to be.

paradigital

873 posts

153 months

Tuesday 1st August 2023
quotequote all
otolith said:
Just to be clear, this isn't a question of the official WLTP/EPA test ranges being gamed, this is about what the dashboard displays the estimated range to be.
Which one? The one that you can switch between battery percentage and "range" (which is simply based off the official range figure, adjusted for SoC), or the one that changes based on consumption/efficiency figures?

The former is pretty useless and I leave it on % SoC. The latter is real-world and pretty accurate in my experience, regardless of how you are driving.

otolith

56,311 posts

205 months

Tuesday 1st August 2023
quotequote all
paradigital said:
Which one? The one that you can switch between battery percentage and "range" (which is simply based off the official range figure, adjusted for SoC), or the one that changes based on consumption/efficiency figures?

The former is pretty useless and I leave it on % SoC. The latter is real-world and pretty accurate in my experience, regardless of how you are driving.
Dunno. This;

https://www.motortrend.com/news/tesla-ev-lying-ran...

Flooble

5,565 posts

101 months

Friday 4th August 2023
quotequote all
Bah, I see that they are now talking about the Dacia Spring having "about 140 miles of range". it has a 26.8kWh battery.

It's not just Tesla.

LivLL

10,902 posts

198 months

Friday 4th August 2023
quotequote all
Register1 said:
Not really overstating at all.
Our M3 RWD (2023) was rated at 272 miles.
Wife can easily get 320+ in these warmer months.
It’s rated at 305 on their website confused

M4cruiser

3,679 posts

151 months

Friday 4th August 2023
quotequote all
SWoll said:
Perhaps it's the muppet who thinks that he can drive his car 4 up with luggage in single digit temperatures at highway speeds and get the advertised range numbers that is referenced in the article?
Not just that, it's the way they all accelerate away from the traffic lights.
Yes EVs can do that of course, but you don't have to prove it every time. If you do, the range will suffer.

otolith

56,311 posts

205 months

Saturday 5th August 2023
quotequote all
M4cruiser said:
Not just that, it's the way they all accelerate away from the traffic lights.
Yes EVs can do that of course, but you don't have to prove it every time. If you do, the range will suffer.
How much difference does hard acceleration actually make in an EV, given that they don’t have the same variation in efficiency that ICEs do?

annodomini2

6,869 posts

252 months

Saturday 5th August 2023
quotequote all
LivLL said:
Register1 said:
Not really overstating at all.
Our M3 RWD (2023) was rated at 272 miles.
Wife can easily get 320+ in these warmer months.
It’s rated at 305 on their website confused
NHSTA range, 305 is the result from WLTP test.

LivLL

10,902 posts

198 months

Saturday 5th August 2023
quotequote all
Sorry thought you were Uk based.

LivLL

10,902 posts

198 months

Saturday 5th August 2023
quotequote all
Seems strange to me the EV makers have cornered themselves into reporting “range” figures which mean nothing rather than using consumption figures and useable battery size as metrics.

Renault had a really good range calculator on their site for the Zoe but unfortunately it’s not great for sales to tell your customers they’ll managed only 60% of the advertised range in winter on the highway.

It’s very confusing for consumers particularly if they aren’t fully certified EV geeks and I can see why that confusion exists. Even the example above having two different testing regimes with wildly differing results doesn’t help.

Tesla seems to over egg the range but let you drive well past zero and does everything to stop owners getting themselves stuck. Others seem to underegg the range but then have turtle modes that kick in with 20 or 30 miles left on the range display.

I’d personally prefer the Tesla approach, be more accurate lower end of the remaining range and give owners a good sized buffer when the inevitably get to zero on occasion.

Hopefully this case will cause pause for thought with all EV makes as to how they communicate the capabilities to customers.

annodomini2

6,869 posts

252 months

Saturday 5th August 2023
quotequote all
LivLL said:
Sorry thought you were Uk based.
UK Cars show NHSTA range

LivLL

10,902 posts

198 months

Saturday 5th August 2023
quotequote all
So Uk Tesla site says 305 range but car displays something entirely different from a completely different test?

Is that right?

LivLL

10,902 posts

198 months

Saturday 5th August 2023
quotequote all
WLTP is what it shows on the UK site.



But car displays EPA range from the US site?



Seems a bit more of a dodgy practice to me. I’d just (wrongly) assumed the China cars had a different battery pack to the US ones.

otolith

56,311 posts

205 months

Saturday 5th August 2023
quotequote all
It’s not meant to be showing an official test range, it’s meant to be estimating range available. The allegation is that rather than trying to give a fair estimate of that (which would inevitably be less than the test range) it artificially inflates it.