Musk says TESLA Roadster will do 0-60 in under 1 second...

Musk says TESLA Roadster will do 0-60 in under 1 second...

Author
Discussion

dimots

3,090 posts

91 months

Thursday 29th February
quotequote all
Electric propulsion would be pretty cool. I hope that’s the plan.

Forester1965

1,531 posts

4 months

Thursday 29th February
quotequote all
honda_exige said:
The amount of propulsive force needed to move a 2 ton car quickly is immense - stand behind the propellors at full throttle of a similarly weighted plane and now realise that that amount of thrust accelerates the plane at a glacial rate by comparison.

How will propulsive 'rockets', even if just compressed air pass any kind of safety legislation? What if a 6yr old kid was standing behind it?
Oh come on, it's not rocket science!

cerb4.5lee

30,715 posts

181 months

Thursday 29th February
quotequote all
NO LARD said:
Might be just Musky BS, and no doubt this will be with a 1 foot rollout or whatever, but - IMHO that's too fast for the public road.
Anything that does more than 70mph in the UK is too fast for the public road, so I wouldn't worry about it too much.

Billy_Rosewood

3,107 posts

165 months

Thursday 29th February
quotequote all
Remotely activated heat guns in the arches for melting the rubber to the road for the traction biggrin

thebraketester

14,246 posts

139 months

Thursday 29th February
quotequote all
pheonix478 said:
thebraketester said:
No one cares about 0-60.... people want solid 400+mile range with lower battery degradation and better cold weather range.... over to you musk.
Speak for yourself. I'm perfectly happy with 200 mile range and couldn't care less about battery degradation, whatever that is. Gimme great handing and an epic 0-60 thanks, although as previously mentioned I'm pretty certain 1 second is total BS. A top fuel dragster is IIRC 0.8 seconds the tyres of which rule out going round corners. Or driving on the road. It's also got 10x the power.
Battery degradation is the equivalent of buying a second hand car to find that you can only fill the tank up 60% full. And if you want to change the tank for a new one which holds the full capacity its gonna cost you £40k. It doesn't matter for leasers, but it will do for the sellers and 2nd hand car buyers.

Edited by thebraketester on Thursday 29th February 09:03

CraigyMc

16,420 posts

237 months

Thursday 29th February
quotequote all
Gordon Hill said:
Mr Plum will be along in a moment with spreadsheets, graphs and some fascinating data and facts so hold on to your hats for that one, we're in for a treat.
You write that like data and facts are a bad thing.

cerb4.5lee

30,715 posts

181 months

Thursday 29th February
quotequote all
CraigyMc said:
Gordon Hill said:
Mr Plum will be along in a moment with spreadsheets, graphs and some fascinating data and facts so hold on to your hats for that one, we're in for a treat.
You write that like data and facts are a bad thing.
It was good banter though I thought. smile

Mr-B

3,781 posts

195 months

Thursday 29th February
quotequote all
Autocar story has spacex rockets included, lol, good luck getting type approval for that in ANY country.

No-one really needs 0-60 in under 5 seconds, 10 seconds is perfectly acceptable and probably more fun as you are engaged in achieving it. If he had come out with a roadster weighing less than 1.4 tons range 700 miles, 10-90% charge time of 5 minutes and 0-60 in 5ish seconds for £50k now that would be way more interesting. 0-60 times = one trick pony.

honda_exige

6,029 posts

207 months

Thursday 29th February
quotequote all
Mr-B said:
Autocar story has spacex rockets included, lol, good luck getting type approval for that in ANY country.

No-one really needs 0-60 in under 5 seconds, 10 seconds is perfectly acceptable and probably more fun as you are engaged in achieving it. If he had come out with a roadster weighing less than 1.4 tons range 700 miles, 10-90% charge time of 5 minutes and 0-60 in 5ish seconds for £50k now that would be way more interesting. 0-60 times = one trick pony.
I bet that if it even exists it's some ridiculous carbuncle like a detachable roof mounted air rocket system supplied aftermarket and therefore not certified for road use. But allows Elon to spew his bks. Kinda like the slightly stupid extra battery pack for the Cybertruck that costs $15k, robs most of the load capacity but allows Elon to claim range goals were mostly met.

CraigyMc

16,420 posts

237 months

Thursday 29th February
quotequote all
honda_exige said:
Mr-B said:
Autocar story has spacex rockets included, lol, good luck getting type approval for that in ANY country.

No-one really needs 0-60 in under 5 seconds, 10 seconds is perfectly acceptable and probably more fun as you are engaged in achieving it. If he had come out with a roadster weighing less than 1.4 tons range 700 miles, 10-90% charge time of 5 minutes and 0-60 in 5ish seconds for £50k now that would be way more interesting. 0-60 times = one trick pony.
I bet that if it even exists it's some ridiculous carbuncle like a detachable roof mounted air rocket system supplied aftermarket and therefore not certified for road use. But allows Elon to spew his bks. Kinda like the slightly stupid extra battery pack for the Cybertruck that costs $15k, robs most of the load capacity but allows Elon to claim range goals were mostly met.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JATO_Rocket_Car

pheonix478

1,328 posts

39 months

Thursday 29th February
quotequote all
thebraketester said:
pheonix478 said:
thebraketester said:
No one cares about 0-60.... people want solid 400+mile range with lower battery degradation and better cold weather range.... over to you musk.
Speak for yourself. I'm perfectly happy with 200 mile range and couldn't care less about battery degradation, whatever that is. Gimme great handing and an epic 0-60 thanks, although as previously mentioned I'm pretty certain 1 second is total BS. A top fuel dragster is IIRC 0.8 seconds the tyres of which rule out going round corners. Or driving on the road. It's also got 10x the power.
Battery degradation is the equivalent of buying a second hand car to find that you can only fill the tank up 60% full. And if you want to change the tank for a new one which holds the full capacity its gonna cost you £40k. It doesn't matter for leasers, but it will do for the sellers and 2nd hand car buyers.
rolleyes oh and have another for 40k rolleyes





Edited by pheonix478 on Thursday 29th February 14:40

fezst

234 posts

125 months

Thursday 29th February
quotequote all
Just clever marketing. Of course it will never actually reach 0-60 in < 1 second but the fact that Musk has said it will gets everyone talking about it.

carlo996

5,729 posts

22 months

Thursday 29th February
quotequote all
fezst said:
Just clever marketing. Of course it will never actually reach 0-60 in < 1 second but the fact that Musk has said it will gets everyone talking about it.makes those that understand physics laugh

James6112

4,385 posts

29 months

Thursday 29th February
quotequote all
thebraketester said:
Battery degradation is the equivalent of buying a second hand car to find that you can only fill the tank up 60% full. And if you want to change the tank for a new one which holds the full capacity its gonna cost you £40k. It doesn't matter for leasers, but it will do for the sellers and 2nd hand car buyers.

Edited by thebraketester on Thursday 29th February 09:03
Made up fact. Aka a lie.

David87

6,661 posts

213 months

Friday 1st March
quotequote all
carlo996 said:
fezst said:
Just clever marketing. Of course it will never actually reach 0-60 in < 1 second but the fact that Musk has said it will gets everyone talking about it.makes those that understand physics laugh
This car is to be a collaboration between Tesla and SpaceX and I'd wager that the engineers, particularly from the latter company, have a fairly decent grasp of physics, what with launching rockets into space and all. wink

I don't doubt they'll make the Roadster go this quickly, but what I can't see happening is doing it in a road-legal configuration. I'd imagine the cold gas thruster part will do the numbers on a drag strip but not be seen at your local Tesco. Doesn't make the headline claim untrue, though.

1690cc

75 posts

17 months

Friday 1st March
quotequote all
Evanivitch said:
What's the fastest and quickest car in the world which doesn't have a special mode, doesn't burn through tyres and can be used without any geo fencing?
Mapped 335d, Southend Seafront 11pm Saturday night

carlo996

5,729 posts

22 months

Friday 1st March
quotequote all
David87 said:
This car is to be a collaboration between Tesla and SpaceX and I'd wager that the engineers, particularly from the latter company, have a fairly decent grasp of physics, what with launching rockets into space and all. wink
Their last launch. I guess we have to bring that up. "Rapid Unscheduled Disassembly" is how they put it, I guess the do have a flair (ahem) for marketing. It RUDdy exploded.

murphyaj

647 posts

76 months

Friday 1st March
quotequote all
David87 said:
I don't doubt they'll make the Roadster go this quickly, but what I can't see happening is doing it in a road-legal configuration. I'd imagine the cold gas thruster part will do the numbers on a drag strip but not be seen at your local Tesco. Doesn't make the headline claim untrue, though.
That's like tethering my Ford Focus to a helicopter then claiming it can fly.

AsyouWere

45 posts

119 months

Thursday 7th March
quotequote all
On the Telas site it states 0-60 in 1.9s?

David87

6,661 posts

213 months

Thursday 7th March
quotequote all
AsyouWere said:
On the Telas site it states 0-60 in 1.9s?
That’s the spec of the original design that they unveiled in 2017. It’s been so long they’ve already achieved that figure with the Model S Plaid and are having a second stab at the Roadster.