Alpine A110 to be axed?
Discussion
CABC said:
i live hope that the camless engine will come to market. 600hp from 2L. better mpg.
could be a great pu for TVR 3.0
It won’t happen because it comes with huge cost and complexity for very little benefit. The camshaft is actually very good at what it does when combined with variable timing. True, you can’t open a valve at any point during the cycle, etc, but then why would you want to? There are only limited places you can open a valve in the cycle. could be a great pu for TVR 3.0
Yes, cam less can offer variable lift, but that can be done today if really needed, but again with cost and complexity, and if the valve can flow enough air for max power at WOT, the it can flow enough at lower power and smaller throttle opens.
Joey Deacon said:
Totally agree, if people are going to spend £50K plus on a sports car it better have a Porsche badge on the front so everyone knows they have a sports car. It's a bit like watches, the majority of people know nothing about watches but they will definitely be impressed if you have a Rolex.
Agree. To take the watch metaphor one step further I'd see Alpine Renault as more of a Casio than, say, a Breitling or similar. And if you're going to compete with Rolex then you're clearly going to lose. Not that there's anything wrong with a Casio of course, just I'm not aware of many Casios being successfully sold for Rolex prices... Megaflow said:
CABC said:
i live hope that the camless engine will come to market. 600hp from 2L. better mpg.
could be a great pu for TVR 3.0
It won’t happen because it comes with huge cost and complexity for very little benefit. The camshaft is actually very good at what it does when combined with variable timing. True, you can’t open a valve at any point during the cycle, etc, but then why would you want to? There are only limited places you can open a valve in the cycle. could be a great pu for TVR 3.0
Yes, cam less can offer variable lift, but that can be done today if really needed, but again with cost and complexity, and if the valve can flow enough air for max power at WOT, the it can flow enough at lower power and smaller throttle opens.
Olivera said:
The Voice said:
As has been said, they got the price point wrong. It’s simply too expensive. That’s why they haven’t sold many.
It needed to be nearer £30k than £50k.
For a bespoke all-aluminium lightweight RWD sports-car platform? Never gonna happen. 30k would reduce it to something like a GT86/BRZ, which gets relentless flak on here...It needed to be nearer £30k than £50k.
Max_Torque said:
As we come out of the "Golden age of the car", ween ourselves off our heady, intoxicating but oh-so-polluting hydrocarbon habit, and perhaps even start to move away from pure consumerism, the changes are going to be absolutely enormous. It'll make the loss of our steel works, or the closure of our coal industry seem trivialby comparison...
Agreed: the structural overcapacity of car manufacturing, especially in high cost western Europe, has to come to an end at some point (unfortunately for those of us who love a spectacular range of cars to choose from) but it's going to be very painful.I'm just sad that an early casualty is inevitably something expensive and low volume (and sweet handling and fast) like the A110. If our choice of cars is being reduced, I'd far rather dream about choosing between three rather than two £50k mid engine 2 seater sports cars. Who cares if my choice of family size SUVs is cut from 40 models to 30...? (and I'm a boring, SUV-owning middle aged father of three.) I understand that is how economics works but sometimes wish it didn't.
MC Bodge said:
Max_Torque said:
BINGO!
Well if the ICE engine is around for years, you'd best like the one you are driving at the moment, because NO ONE is developing any new ones now.
And if they aren't developing them, you can't buy them, no matter how great you think the ICE actually is..........
Are the manufacturers intending to use mildly updated existing engines/with electric hybrid for the next generation of cars?Well if the ICE engine is around for years, you'd best like the one you are driving at the moment, because NO ONE is developing any new ones now.
And if they aren't developing them, you can't buy them, no matter how great you think the ICE actually is..........
BeVs for passenger cars currently hold almost all the cards. That makes betting against them a risky move, no matter what the next card in the pack happens to actually be. This is the problem of so called "distuptive" technology, it is often the fear of what might happen that drives events rather than what does actually happen.....
Edited by anonymous-user on Wednesday 20th May 16:24
Joey Deacon said:
Mainstream sports cars sell in tiny numbers, look at how many GT86s have been sold. How many of the new Toyota Supra will be sold, a handful I bet.
Except one. Miata is always the answerJoey Deacon said:
The majority of people these days want an SUV so they can sit up high and feel safe.
Sad but true.Also the bonkers types at Mazda seem to be having at go at HCCI/SkyActiv X engines. I'd love an ND with that engine.
EDIT:messed up the quoting.
Edited by TheDrBrian on Wednesday 20th May 18:50
nickfrog said:
Joey Deacon said:
Totally agree, if people are going to spend £50K plus on a sports car it better have a Porsche badge on the front so everyone knows they have a sports car. It's a bit like watches, the majority of people know nothing about watches but they will definitely be impressed if you have a Rolex.
Mainstream sports cars sell in tiny numbers, look at how many GT86s have been sold. How many of the new Toyota Supra will be sold, a handful I bet.
The majority of people these days want an SUV so they can sit up high and feel safe.
I am not sure, if I really cared about the badge I would probably prefer something that is not the ubiquitous Porsche and the Alpine badge would appeal to me, far more boutique. Mainstream sports cars sell in tiny numbers, look at how many GT86s have been sold. How many of the new Toyota Supra will be sold, a handful I bet.
The majority of people these days want an SUV so they can sit up high and feel safe.
As for SUVs, they are not incompatible with sports cars. If anything, most sports cars on a typical track day are towed...by an SUV.
If you say "I drive an Alpine"
"Oh, one of those modified BMWs"
"No, an Alpine, not an Alpina"
"Oh."
"It's a sports car, using Renault drive train".
"Hmm".
If you have to explain it, it doesn't have a high level of status.
People come up with all sorts of weird logical arguments to justify purchasing status symbols. Go ask on the watch forum why they have spent a fortune on a watch which does nothing better than a timex. None of them will fess up to wanting a status symbol, it will all be about the heritage or engineering.
Coming up with a new brand is hard. Did Toyota achieve it with Lexus? You can make an argument that their cars are up their with Merc/Audi/BMW but you don't see many driving about.
Nissan failed with the Infiniti brand.
Merc couldn't revive maybach
Maybe Telsa will be able to stay as a premium brand.
Edited by Fittster on Wednesday 20th May 17:01
Fittster said:
You are trying to show off you status (which I'm sure no one here could ever do), it's easy to say "I drive a Porsche"
If you say "I drive an Alpine"
"Oh, one of those modified BMWs"
"No, an Alpine, not an Alpina"
"Oh."
"It's a sports car, using Renault drive train".
"Hmm".
If you have to explain it, it doesn't have a high level of status.
People come up with all sorts of weird logical arguments to justify purchasing status symbols. Go ask on the watch forum why they have spent a fortune on a watch which does nothing better than a timex. None of them will fess up to wanting a status symbol, it will all be about the heritage or engineering.
not sure of the real status of any car, especially a sports car is today. If you say "I drive an Alpine"
"Oh, one of those modified BMWs"
"No, an Alpine, not an Alpina"
"Oh."
"It's a sports car, using Renault drive train".
"Hmm".
If you have to explain it, it doesn't have a high level of status.
People come up with all sorts of weird logical arguments to justify purchasing status symbols. Go ask on the watch forum why they have spent a fortune on a watch which does nothing better than a timex. None of them will fess up to wanting a status symbol, it will all be about the heritage or engineering.
general public are either unaware or likely to be dismissive. i drive my cars despite the impression they may give.
untakenname said:
there's no way I'd buy a modern French car and own outright.
Why wouldn't you? I can show you evidence they are reliable:https://europe.jdpower.com/press-releases/2019-uk-...
CABC said:
Fittster said:
You are trying to show off you status (which I'm sure no one here could ever do), it's easy to say "I drive a Porsche"
If you say "I drive an Alpine"
"Oh, one of those modified BMWs"
"No, an Alpine, not an Alpina"
"Oh."
"It's a sports car, using Renault drive train".
"Hmm".
If you have to explain it, it doesn't have a high level of status.
People come up with all sorts of weird logical arguments to justify purchasing status symbols. Go ask on the watch forum why they have spent a fortune on a watch which does nothing better than a timex. None of them will fess up to wanting a status symbol, it will all be about the heritage or engineering.
not sure of the real status of any car, especially a sports car is today. If you say "I drive an Alpine"
"Oh, one of those modified BMWs"
"No, an Alpine, not an Alpina"
"Oh."
"It's a sports car, using Renault drive train".
"Hmm".
If you have to explain it, it doesn't have a high level of status.
People come up with all sorts of weird logical arguments to justify purchasing status symbols. Go ask on the watch forum why they have spent a fortune on a watch which does nothing better than a timex. None of them will fess up to wanting a status symbol, it will all be about the heritage or engineering.
general public are either unaware or likely to be dismissive. i drive my cars despite the impression they may give.
However amongst the general public certain brands are associated with desirable characteristics, which some people may think will rub off on them if they purchase them. Do you think people regard Lamborghini, Ferrari, Porsche in the same way as Honda, Ford and Nissan?
The amount of money luxury companies are willing to spend to promote and protect their brands suggests there must be something in it.
Fittster said:
I'm sure everyone on this forum choose cars based on the dynamic characteristics, without a though given to the badge.
However amongst the general public certain brands are associated with desirable characteristics, which some people may think will rub off on them if they purchase them. Do you think people regard Lamborghini, Ferrari, Porsche in the same way as Honda, Ford and Nissan?
The amount of money luxury companies are willing to spend to promote and protect their brands suggests there must be something in it.
if only this forum was exclusively enthusiasts!However amongst the general public certain brands are associated with desirable characteristics, which some people may think will rub off on them if they purchase them. Do you think people regard Lamborghini, Ferrari, Porsche in the same way as Honda, Ford and Nissan?
The amount of money luxury companies are willing to spend to promote and protect their brands suggests there must be something in it.
my point really is that cars often don't really achieve the status value. more likely to engender resentment or pity for your mid-life crisis.
My answer is, life IS an existential crisis. i need more cars!
Joey Deacon said:
Totally agree, if people are going to spend £50K plus on a sports car it better have a Porsche badge on the front so everyone knows they have a sports car. It's a bit like watches, the majority of people know nothing about watches but they will definitely be impressed if you have a Rolex.
Sadly this is trueMy Dad was having a conversation when we were at the gym, chap was showing off his new rolex, and asked to see my dads watch, we were of to a dinner after so dad showed him what was on his wrist - A Lange and Sohne, the other chap said with a bit of a sneer "that looks ok, but its not a Rolex"
I guess he was right, its not a Rolex......
To be fair though, Porsche have superb marketing and high profile sales centres, the competitors, Lotus, Alpine are not even close at those things, despite making cars that are at least as good if not better to drive.
john41901 said:
nickfrog said:
The Voice said:
As has been said, they got the price point wrong. It’s simply too expensive. That’s why they haven’t sold many.
It needed to be nearer £30k than £50k.
Yeah it's only a Megane in a frock... apparently. It needed to be nearer £30k than £50k.
Fittster said:
Coming up with a new brand is hard. Did Toyota achieve it with Lexus? You can make an argument that their cars are up their with Merc/Audi/BMW but you don't see many driving about.
Nissan failed with the Infiniti brand.
Merc couldn't revive maybach
Maybe Telsa will be able to stay as a premium brand.
Alpine isn't a new brand, it's a revived one.Nissan failed with the Infiniti brand.
Merc couldn't revive maybach
Maybe Telsa will be able to stay as a premium brand.
Edited by Fittster on Wednesday 20th May 17:01
Lexus' main target market isn't Europe, it's the US where it has done very well. Ditto Infiniti, but not as well as Lexus, and definitely a failure in Europe.
Maybach's first attempt at a rebirth was indeed a misfire, but the revised approach is doing well. More Maybach S-classes were selling in China than XJs.
Fittster said:
untakenname said:
there's no way I'd buy a modern French car and own outright.
Why wouldn't you? I can show you evidence they are reliable:https://europe.jdpower.com/press-releases/2019-uk-...
Anyway, I'd be sad to see the alpine being axed. I really liked them. I've only seen one in the wild though, on the M25 last year.
Edited by Noesph on Wednesday 20th May 17:49
Gassing Station | Alpine | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff