Tiger or Robin Hood?
Discussion
It may be a bit snobbish but I'd prefer to have a non-Q reg too...
Ooh I'm going to have to bite at this. Why is a Q plate less presigious than a plate that previously belonged to a rusty 20 year old Sierra?
Yesterday I finally received a Q plate for the Fury that I've been building for the last 5 1/2 years. You don't find all the best bits on one donor. Just my slightly biased opinion.
Ooh I'm going to have to bite at this. Why is a Q plate less presigious than a plate that previously belonged to a rusty 20 year old Sierra?
Yesterday I finally received a Q plate for the Fury that I've been building for the last 5 1/2 years. You don't find all the best bits on one donor. Just my slightly biased opinion.
I have a Q plate on my Tiger - I could have gone for an age-related plate as it seems the DVLA would have been happy to allocate one, but I just couldn't see the point - it's a kitcar, it's obviously a kitcar, so why is having the plate from an ancient Cortina better???
Edited by anonymous-user on Thursday 15th November 15:53
I'm happy with the 1983 Sierra plate it's got, adds an eliment of mystery to it.
It's a shame though because I have got 'L9 RPM' on a Volvo that is still taxed but will never see the road again it can only go on a post 1993 car.
Once a 'Q' always a 'Q', at least with this I could get a personal plate on it sometime in the future. Maybe chance it with retro looking (pre-1974?) black and silver plates.
It's a shame though because I have got 'L9 RPM' on a Volvo that is still taxed but will never see the road again it can only go on a post 1993 car.
Once a 'Q' always a 'Q', at least with this I could get a personal plate on it sometime in the future. Maybe chance it with retro looking (pre-1974?) black and silver plates.
Gassing Station | Kit Cars | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff