Buying a second hand kit car

Buying a second hand kit car

Author
Discussion

singlecoil

Original Poster:

33,689 posts

247 months

Tuesday 26th January 2010
quotequote all
Should be enough combined knowledge on this forum for us to be able to set out aqlist of things people should look out for when buying a second hand kit, whether it's a car that has been built and registered, or an abandoned project-

I'll start by saying that the first thing to do is to check its legal status. If it's on the road, is it correctly registered, or has the builder evaded the SVA/IVA test by keeping it on the donor registration or by cloning a for instance MK as an old Dutton? If it's an abandoned project make sure you get all the receipts and the build photos

Paul Drawmer

4,879 posts

268 months

Tuesday 26th January 2010
quotequote all
Yeah, don't buy it from some dodgy old bloke who meets you in a lay by!

rdodger

1,088 posts

204 months

Tuesday 26th January 2010
quotequote all
Paul Drawmer said:
Yeah, don't buy it from some dodgy old bloke who meets you in a lay by!
Oh no! Not again Paul?

singlecoil

Original Poster:

33,689 posts

247 months

Tuesday 26th January 2010
quotequote all
As far as the car itself is concerned, probably the single most important thing is the wiring. It's a lot easier to change a duff engine, or any other component, than it is to rewire a car. If the donor loom has been used (the clue to this is big masses of wire done up with cable ties to reduce its bulk, often crammed up behind the dashboard), then make sure all the electrics are working perfectly, because if they aren't it may be impossible to sort out properly without a complete rewire.

deviant

4,316 posts

211 months

Wednesday 27th January 2010
quotequote all
I would say this applies to any performance car really but dont assume that the shopping list in the advert will still be in the car when you go to see it especially with things you cant see like trick engine / transmission internals.

singlecoil

Original Poster:

33,689 posts

247 months

Thursday 28th January 2010
quotequote all
I'm surprised this thread is dying a death like this. I reckon probably at least half the kit cars in existence are owned by people who didn't build them. I know most of the cars I see have been bought second hand and most of those owners would have benefited from some advice as to what to look for.

I suppose though, even if we did build up a decent check list the problem would be to get people to look at it before looking at the car! It's a lot easier to make a bad mistake buying a kit than it is buying a second hand production car.

Cobra Andy

472 posts

229 months

Thursday 28th January 2010
quotequote all
Research is IMHO the first place to start, most kits have there own forum so thats the obvious place to start, especially as a lot of cars for sale will be known within the club, not all admittedly.
Try and get someone who knows the make of kit to go with you to have a look, dont just jump in and buy the first one you see, unless it comes via recommendation from a known source as it were.
Make sure its properly registered, check all the paperwork to ensure its as advertised, look at the general build quality, you get a good feeling for a kit judging its build quality, go over it with a fine toothcomb, outside inside underneath etc.
Mileage is a good indicator as well, if its 5 years old and less than 1000 miles on the clock - why ?, is it unreliable etc, most should average 3-5K miles per year as an indicator.
Some are also factory builds or specialist builds and not 'DIY' projects, always check back with the builder for any info spec at build, does it match now.
Manufacturers often keep good records as well, especially of supply dates etc so you can check there as well.
Check tyres not just for tread etc but are they the correct rating for the car ie speed rating.

Thats it for now, will get back with some other tips in a while.

Dibby

423 posts

201 months

Tuesday 9th February 2010
quotequote all
Make sure it's correctly registered on the V5 and comes with a stack of paperwork.

Avoid Q plates and go for something with a proper registration that's been through the SVA test and not cobbled together. The easiest part of a kit car is bolting the thing together, the hardest thing is getting it all set up right for the SVA test - that's why you see a lot of 90% finished projects.

If it's an older engine, look out for things tuned to within an inch of their lives and running rich. It will go pop one day.

Electrics, it doesn't cost that much to get a full re-wire, we had to do ours and it wasn't too expensive but a lot of fuss and hassle. Look for odd wires dangling about, fuses tucked under carpets and not in a fusebox.

MKnight702

3,110 posts

215 months

Tuesday 9th February 2010
quotequote all
Dibby said:
Make sure it's correctly registered on the V5 and comes with a stack of paperwork.

Avoid Q plates and go for something with a proper registration that's been through the SVA test and not cobbled together.
Agreed on the paperwork, check it's registered as the kit not the donor.

As for Q plate, absolute rubbish. The Q plate is not a sign that it hasn't been through the SVA, anything registered in the last 8+ years will have been through the SVA test, the Q plate simply means that the car is of "unknown" age which can be a simple as using multiple donor sources. Such as the Tiger owner that tried to register as a Sierra donor but had swapped the engine for a Zetec so the DVLA gave him a Q, as they quite rightly pointed out that the Sierra never had a Zetec engine.

Dibby

423 posts

201 months

Tuesday 9th February 2010
quotequote all
Maybe it was an assumption but the Q plates out there I have seen when looking to buy a kit car were all ropey so I thought that a Q was something to do with the SVA.

I'm always wary when I see a Q plated car

motco

15,965 posts

247 months

Tuesday 9th February 2010
quotequote all
A Q plate can offer a big advantage at MoT time. My 'Q' Westfield does not have to pass any form of emissions test excpet for 'visible smoke' and my friendly tester says that as long as he can still see the wall when he revs it, it's passed!

Dibby

423 posts

201 months

Tuesday 9th February 2010
quotequote all
That could also be a disadvantage if someone was to 'tune' their engine by winding the fuel mixture up to make it do 0-60 once and belch out black smoke like a mapped diesel. I've also steered well clear of old Pintos that smelled rich and sounded too cammy when looking about.

Suppose it all depends on what you're looking for in a kit car, I don't mind the emissions test but then I'm not into squeezing every last drop of power from what is admittedly an ageing engine.

singlecoil

Original Poster:

33,689 posts

247 months

Tuesday 9th February 2010
quotequote all
Dibby said:
Maybe it was an assumption but the Q plates out there I have seen when looking to buy a kit car were all ropey so I thought that a Q was something to do with the SVA.

I'm always wary when I see a Q plated car
Q plates are issued when there are not enough parts from one car used to qualify for an age related conventional registration. I would be more wary of a kit that didn't have one, and would definitely check that it was correctly registered, as there are some owners who have simply kept the original donor's registration. Having said that I would check the registration thoroughly in any case.

There is absolutely no correlation between type of registration (Q or non Q) and quality of build.

motco

15,965 posts

247 months

Tuesday 9th February 2010
quotequote all
Dibby said:
That could also be a disadvantage if someone was to 'tune' their engine by winding the fuel mixture up to make it do 0-60 once and belch out black smoke like a mapped diesel. I've also steered well clear of old Pintos that smelled rich and sounded too cammy when looking about.

Suppose it all depends on what you're looking for in a kit car, I don't mind the emissions test but then I'm not into squeezing every last drop of power from what is admittedly an ageing engine.
I have a twin Dellorto carbed Pinto with a fast road cam and I have to admit they all sound 'cammy', as you put it, on the wilder types of cams, but the induction roar drowns that much of the time. As for rich smells, I don't seem to have that problem with mine. I was assured that a car would have to be VERY smoky to fail though.

Ferg

15,242 posts

258 months

Tuesday 9th February 2010
quotequote all
Always check with experts on PistonHeads. rolleyes

motco

15,965 posts

247 months

Tuesday 9th February 2010
quotequote all
Ferg said:
Always check with experts on PistonHeads. rolleyes
...and your point is? biggrin

Ferg

15,242 posts

258 months

Tuesday 9th February 2010
quotequote all
My point, as always, is that if you don't KNOW, don't guess. 'Cos it's fk all use to other people if you do.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E10Bp_mPXXA

singlecoil

Original Poster:

33,689 posts

247 months

Tuesday 9th February 2010
quotequote all
Ferg said:
My point, as always, is that if you don't KNOW, don't guess. 'Cos it's fk all use to other people if you do.

Are you referring to something someone has said on this thread?

Dibby

423 posts

201 months

Tuesday 9th February 2010
quotequote all
Most likely, but that's internet forums for you

They're full of ad-hoc, ill-informed reckons of people like me beating away on the keyboard with my fist redface

Art_Vandelay

6,689 posts

185 months

Saturday 13th February 2010
quotequote all
Slightly off topic here, but how old are each of you with kit cars and what sort of insurance are you paying. Contemplating a 7-a-like as a second car which would be doing under 4000 miles a year.

I would be buying second hand and in November.

You may have seen the Phaeton thread that I started and be thinking I'm a time waster hehe but I'm just after opinions. The thought of a cheaper barge, similar to the Phaeton but costing a bit less (thinking older Audi A8 or Jaguar XJ) plus something special for the weekend is starting to appeal more to me.

I love my current car but feel that, because it is driven everyday and is something of a jack of all trades, I don't get the same buzz any more.

Still really just ideas in my head, if kit car insurance is justifiably low for the use the car would be getting, it could certainly feature prominently on my list of cars.

As an aside, what is the wet weather gear like on a kit car. For example, a car that has piqued my interest is here: http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/1390023.htm

The benefits of it being that the wet weather gear is stored within the car. Obviously it will not be as easy as putting up a normal convertible roof, but at least if I get caught up in the north east's god awful weather, I have a way of keeping my feet dry wink

Cheers in advance.

James

Oh and I'm not 21 for 9 months yet, figured I'd get my research in nice and early biggrin