RE: Decree threatens motor sport

RE: Decree threatens motor sport

Author
Discussion

Annodomini2

6,867 posts

252 months

Tuesday 19th April 2005
quotequote all
Thing is what you may not understand, this country is run by civil servants, has been for years.

Jasper Gilder

2,166 posts

274 months

Tuesday 19th April 2005
quotequote all
I give up - lets vote 'em out and see if another party can manage the hare brained civil servants a bit better

benfell100

8,468 posts

261 months

Tuesday 19th April 2005
quotequote all
Mmm, I have to admit that a government that has garnered so much trust from its public in recent years (NOT), taxes Joe Public to within an inch of bankruptcy, attacks the motorist at every junction, passes laws without any consultation to those it affects and generally pi55e5 off the majority population should really stay in power...



...right up until the general election boots them out with their tails between there legs.

Lets face it, any alternative is better than an arrogant, self righteous bunch who think they can do what they like.

Imagine what size their heads will be if they won on May 5th? What would they think they could get away with?

The ONLY alternative is to vote the Motorist hating bunch if twits onto the other side of the House.

ftasb

229 posts

240 months

Tuesday 19th April 2005
quotequote all
This is not an unfamiliar tactic. The loonies recently "reworded" the open general licence for pest shooting. This was done without consultation with any relevant organisations. Net result was to criminalsise on Monday what had been fully lawful on Sunday without actually telling anyone.
Following an immediate and very well organised response by the representative bodies from the shooting/farming world (Except what is supposedly the largest shooting organisation, wonder who tucks them into bed at night? )a major back pedalling exercise was soon in place and the licence was reworded and clarified and nationally reported to return the situation to the former licence conditions. It had worked for years so just why did they alter it??

So, moan to the right people and things will get done, but watch your backs because the devious little sods wont rest until we all ramble, wear sandals and go vegetarian and ride a bicycle.
Vote the buggers out. It is the only way.

If it works or it is fun they will ban it.

Skyedriver

17,898 posts

283 months

Tuesday 19th April 2005
quotequote all
[quote=ftasb devious little sods wont rest until we all ramble, wear sandals and go vegetarian and ride a bicycle.
Vote the buggers out. It is the only way.

If it works or it is fun they will ban it.[/quote]
'scuse me, I ramble occasionally, am vegetarian and ride a bike! (Well I am the village postman)
I also used to compete in Autocross, am a great supporter of grass roots motorsport and am fully opposed to the ban.
Unfortunately, the way the run up to this elction is going, B-liar, Fatty-P, and Mugger Brown will be back for another 4 years. Can't suggest anything to get rid of them either!

farmer

1,287 posts

275 months

Wednesday 20th April 2005
quotequote all
trawled through this lot , then trawled once more through one of a collection of new books of regulation laughingly called the simplified scheme , and thought i'd better throw a bit of light on the matter as best I can .

I don't claim to know the new system inside out , but am currently the chairman of my local NFU branch ,and have attended numerous seminars and meetings on the SPS or Single Payment Scheme, also I've spent several "spare" days over the past week trying to scrape together all the information to put in my claim for payment , against a backdrop of DEFRA and RPA hopeless incompetence .

Please don't get hung up over the term setaside and what you can and can't do on it , because whilst it may be the case that some motorsport has been legitimately (I havn't a clue sorry) carried out on Setaside land and may or may not now be allowed , the whole ethos has now shifted (which is actualy a good thing) so that a Farmer is not now restricted in how he uses his land to provide cheap food for the EU that may or may not be in oversuply (another issue).

It is indeed true that under the SPS a farmer can claim payment for virtualy every activity other than Motorsport ,camping and golf.It only means that the area actualy used for such activities must be left out of the claim , and as has been stated above a decently run event should be able to more than compensate for any loss of earnings , as at the end of the day SPS is hardly a bonanza ,

the only slight niggle I can see is that in order for an area of un-cropped land to remain eligible for future payments if circumstances change it must be kept in what the government civil servents (who are of course experts !!!!!) define as GAEC. Good Agricultural & Environmental Condition .It is down to those farmers concerned to assess the implications of that and no two situations will be the same . But under section C parragraph 48 of the SPS handbook for 2005 (great bed time reading !)land may still be eligible for a claim under SPS if used for a limited number of days a year as a car park (still under review ) though "woe betide you" if it is a very wet day as GEAC would not be fulfilled.

So there you have it as clear as mud

Don't be fooled, this government has brought the countryside to it's knees (literaly begging)in blatant revenge for Thatchers treatment of the Miners (virtualy admitted by Prestcot in an un-guarded moment, not that she did us an awfull lot of good either !!!) and we all here know how they love car owners , They are a spitefull bunch but will be re- elected because of the opposition .

hooray for democracy !!!!!!


>> Edited by farmer on Wednesday 20th April 01:03

james_j

3,996 posts

256 months

Wednesday 20th April 2005
quotequote all
Annodomini2 said:
Thing is what you may not understand, this country is run by civil servants, has been for years.


True enough, but Labour has been creating thousands more and no doubt votes too.

farmer

1,287 posts

275 months

Wednesday 20th April 2005
quotequote all
just thought I'd refresh this because I sat up late giving you all a piece of my infinite expertise

Graham

16,368 posts

285 months

Thursday 21st April 2005
quotequote all
Skyedriver said:

Unfortunately, the way the run up to this elction is going, B-liar, Fatty-P, and Mugger Brown will be back for another 4 years. Can't suggest anything to get rid of them either!



A nice civil war perhaps ?


Incorrigible

13,668 posts

262 months

Thursday 21st April 2005
quotequote all
Graham said:
A nice civil war perhaps ?
Sign me up

And I don't rate the cyclists chances against my Range Rover

zumbruk

7,848 posts

261 months

Thursday 21st April 2005
quotequote all
"No man is good enough to govern another man without that other’s consent." – Abraham Lincoln

ATG

20,616 posts

273 months

Thursday 21st April 2005
quotequote all
DEFRA and Co. are a bunch of hopeless second raters. Yes, they do hatch the odd devious plot, but as often as not their decisions are pretty much random, determined arbitrarily by incompetent lack of foresight and imagination.

Interesting to hear from someone who knows what he is talking about; God bless you, farmer.

How much land is needed to make the track? 3 or 4 acres? How much subsidy would a farmer be able to claim for that land?

Graham

16,368 posts

285 months

Thursday 21st April 2005
quotequote all
zumbruk said:
"No man is good enough to govern another man without that other’s consent." – Abraham Lincoln



" anyone who expresses the slightest interest in politics should be banned immediatly"

Billy Conolly

britten_mark

1,593 posts

254 months

Thursday 21st April 2005
quotequote all
I seem to remember another thread a few years ago about these DEFRA scumbags making it legal to remove apparently redundant vehicles from YOUR land with 5 days notice and WITHOUT CONSENT.

So, Mrs Twitchycurtains next door doesn't approve of how long its taking to restore your E-type in your own driveway, waits until you are on a fortnights holiday, one phone call and bingo.

Apparently their boss has huge sympathies with the rambling associations. Twerp.

anonymous-user

55 months

Thursday 21st April 2005
quotequote all
This is a press release form the MSA.

MSA tackles DEFRA threat to UK motor sport

The Motor Sports Association has vowed to fight all the way to Brussels to safeguard the future of nearly 50 percent of its sanctioned motor sport events after the government decided to stop subsidies to farmers who allow part of their land to be used, even temporarily, for any form of motor sport.

The MSA has joined forces with the governing body of motor cycle racing (ACU) and other affected parties to challenge the Government's decision, channelling its efforts through the Land Access & Recreation Association (LARA) of which the MSA is a founding memmber and major funder.

The Single Payment Scheme (SPS) replaces the Common Agricultural Policy and now pays farmers for the land they own, not what they produce. The European directive on agricultural subsidies does not prohibit motor sports on land eligible for SPS. However, the Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) has taken the decision, without consultation, to stop these payments to UK landowners if agricultural land is used, even temporarily, for motor sport.

Activities that will be particularly impacted are autograss, autocross, sporting trials, production car trials, 4x4 events and some rallies.

"We believe the current guidance from DEFRA to landowners is incorrect, is inconsistent with EU policy and fundamentally threatens the future of motor
sport in this country. The MSA is a founding member and substantial funder of LARA and it is entirely appropriate that the concerted response of all
interested parties to this threat is channelled through LARA. We hope to have a successful conclusion to our urgent dialogue with DEFRA, but should
the need arise we are prepared to pursue this issue further," said Colin Hilton, Chief Executive of the Motor Sports Association.

farmer

1,287 posts

275 months

Thursday 21st April 2005
quotequote all
ATG said:
DEFRA and Co. are a bunch of hopeless second raters. Yes, they do hatch the odd devious plot, but as often as not their decisions are pretty much random, determined arbitrarily by incompetent lack of foresight and imagination.

Interesting to hear from someone who knows what he is talking about; God bless you, farmer.

How much land is needed to make the track? 3 or 4 acres? How much subsidy would a farmer be able to claim for that land?



I don't know if I'd go that far but thanks for the blessing none-the-less

in simple terms about £70-80/acre/year depending on the area the land is situated , and it's productive capacity status, and the historic use it has been put too, and how many environmental hoops the custodian is qualified or prepared to jump through

farmer

1,287 posts

275 months

Thursday 21st April 2005
quotequote all
pablo said:
The Single Payment Scheme (SPS) replaces the Common Agricultural Policy and now pays farmers for the land they own, not what they produce.



not strictly true, The SPS is the latest (and biggest)reform to the implimentation of the CAP
and pays farmers (who otherwise grew crops,at or below break even, just to get paid, to subsidise Tesco) on the land under thier control (owned, tenanted or common land)

Farmer

1,287 posts

275 months

Tuesday 17th May 2005
quotequote all
NON-AGRICULTURAL USE AND MOTORSPORTS
Last Friday RPA confirmed that they have revised the rules governing the use of agricultural land for motor sports during the 10-month qualifying period. The riules now provide for motor sports to take place on up to 28 days during the 10-month eligibility period on land used in support of 2005 Single Payment claims. Guidance for 2006 and beyond will be reviewed in the light of experience of this first year of the SPS.

hot of the press !!!

Eric Mc

122,058 posts

266 months

Friday 20th May 2005
quotequote all
Heard this on "You and Yours" on Radio 4 a few minutes ago. The 28 day limit is for 2005 only and will be reviewed for 2006.