Alfa Romeo 147 2.0 Twin Spark - Unseen-ish

Alfa Romeo 147 2.0 Twin Spark - Unseen-ish

Author
Discussion

RicksAlfas

13,408 posts

245 months

Thursday 5th July 2018
quotequote all
Could be due all eight spark plugs at 60,000 miles too.

stewjohnst

Original Poster:

2,442 posts

162 months

Thursday 5th July 2018
quotequote all
RicksAlfas said:
Could be due all eight spark plugs at 60,000 miles too.
Yep, mines about three miles shy of 75,000 and I’m pretending not to notice it needs plugs to add on top of the belts and variator this month whistle

I’ll do them myself next month with the spare change from scrapping the donor shell.

SidewaysSi

10,742 posts

235 months

Thursday 5th July 2018
quotequote all
We have just bought a Nissan Note as we needed something more practical so need to get rid of our 147. Just driven it this evening and it is good fun.

Cracking cars for virtually no money.

Vitorio

4,296 posts

144 months

Friday 6th July 2018
quotequote all
stewjohnst said:
RicksAlfas said:
Could be due all eight spark plugs at 60,000 miles too.
Yep, mines about three miles shy of 75,000 and I’m pretending not to notice it needs plugs to add on top of the belts and variator this month whistle

I’ll do them myself next month with the spare change from scrapping the donor shell.
The plugs doesnt seem like a big deal to me, sure there is 8 of them, and they dont cost 3 quid like the plugs you put into a 20 year old VW, but it still is a sub 100 gbp/eur item if you can DIY it (which is easy, from the top of my head a torx-40, torx-25 and 16mm plug socket, extension and ratchet is all you need), its less hassle then an oil change, and only slightly more expensive, and keeps you going for another 60K

Seems like a silly reason to get rid of a car, its not the same order of magnitude as a new belt, pump and variator for instance.

RicksAlfas

13,408 posts

245 months

Friday 6th July 2018
quotequote all
Yes, I agree Vitorio.
It's just something else to be mindful of if you are paying top whack for an old Spider with 60,000 miles on it. It's alright paying top whack if everything is spot on, but not if you find it's never had plugs, belts, it's running on a set of ditchfinders and the suspension sounds like a socket set having a gangbang in a toolbox.

jfire

5,893 posts

73 months

Friday 6th July 2018
quotequote all
Cheers, I'll watch out for suspension all the things that were wrong with my 147, and try to find one with plugs done.

Vitorio

4,296 posts

144 months

Friday 6th July 2018
quotequote all
RicksAlfas said:
Yes, I agree Vitorio.
It's just something else to be mindful of if you are paying top whack for an old Spider with 60,000 miles on it. It's alright paying top whack if everything is spot on, but not if you find it's never had plugs, belts, it's running on a set of ditchfinders and the suspension sounds like a socket set having a gangbang in a toolbox.
Agreed, its good to keep an eye out for service items like plugs, belts etc.. Can always be used to negotiate the price down.

jfire said:
Cheers, I'll watch out for suspension all the things that were wrong with my 147, and try to find one with plugs done.
The GTV uses different suspension then the 147, so stuff like the front upper wishbones of the 147 dont apply to the GTV. From what i remember from my GTV-lusting days (never got to buy one though), the front is mostly 155 based, the back is bespoke (making for more expensive bits). Rust is obviously a factor.

Otherwise the main 916 specific item is the TS engine, belt interval is 3 years/36K, whichever comes first. The 2.0 units will have a balance shaft making the swap job a bit more expensive then on the smaller ones. A diesel-y sound on startup often means the variator is on its way out, not catastrophic, but another pricey addition to the belt-swap bill. Plugs as mentioned are a ~90 quid item due every 60K but are easily DIYed.

The main thing about buying any TS engined car though, is oil. They all use oil to some degree (although the CF3 engines in the 147 etc.. were rather bad), especially on 10w40, and running a TS below the minimum oil will quickly damaged the big end bearings, which will cost you an engine. Apparently the 2.0 is the most vulnerable here as its stroke is the longest, hence the big end bearing get stressed quite a lot. My recommendation would be to walk away from any TS engined car where the oil is below the min mark, and when running one, check the oil regularly (in the beginning VERY regularly, to get a feel for how thirsty it is), and top up when needed.
Running 10w60 rather then the specced 10w40 apparently helps with oil usage, but is more suited to a sporty driving style (and more expensive)

RicksAlfas

13,408 posts

245 months

Friday 6th July 2018
quotequote all
Going off topic now...

The other thing that let Alfa down on the Twin Spark was the small capacity tin sump, which in turn was enclosed in all the engine bay heat by an undertray. The previous generation (Nord) twincam had a huge alloy winged and finned number on display for holding 7 litres of finest multigrade, and the engines went on forever...


stewjohnst

Original Poster:

2,442 posts

162 months

Friday 6th July 2018
quotequote all
RicksAlfas said:
Going off topic now...

The other thing that let Alfa down on the Twin Spark was the small capacity tin sump, which in turn was enclosed in all the engine bay heat by an undertray. The previous generation (Nord) twincam had a huge alloy winged and finned number on display for holding 7 litres of finest multigrade, and the engines went on forever...
The bumper on mine has been off at some point and the majority of the undertray is ‘missing in action’ it’s something else I’ll stealing from the donor, it’s practically a bare shell now biggrin

Vitorio

4,296 posts

144 months

Friday 6th July 2018
quotequote all
stewjohnst said:
The bumper on mine has been off at some point and the majority of the undertray is ‘missing in action’ it’s something else I’ll stealing from the donor, it’s practically a bare shell now biggrin
Is there any point in having an undertray though? It was gone on my 147, but the new GT still has it (annoyingly making acces to the oil filter and stuff like the air filter more difficult)

stewjohnst

Original Poster:

2,442 posts

162 months

Friday 6th July 2018
quotequote all
Vitorio said:
Is there any point in having an undertray though?
With the dry weather we’ve been having, the engine bay wouldn’t so bloody dusty!


Edited by stewjohnst on Friday 6th July 14:58

RicksAlfas

13,408 posts

245 months

Saturday 7th July 2018
quotequote all
My understanding was the undertray was to help drive by noise regs. It does not offer any aero or performance benefits. It’s not meaty enough to offer any substantial protection. I’d sling it in the skip.

exgtt

2,067 posts

213 months

Saturday 7th July 2018
quotequote all
The tray can stop crap/water from being flung up into the belt area. It’s by no means critical but does offer some benefit in winter with salt.

stewjohnst

Original Poster:

2,442 posts

162 months

Thursday 12th July 2018
quotequote all
Finally got it booked in for the belts so hopefully it doesn’t pop it’s clogs before the 23rd.

Not bothering with the variator as there’s no obvious noise yet so will Change that at the next set of belts in 3 years time.

Of course, this now defines the little Alfa as a keeper biggrin

Vitorio

4,296 posts

144 months

Thursday 12th July 2018
quotequote all
Proper job!

I just sold my 147 about an hour ago, but to compensate i now drive a very good nick 2005 GT, basically a 147 in a sexy dress and trackshoes smile

RicksAlfas

13,408 posts

245 months

Friday 13th July 2018
quotequote all
Vitorio said:
Proper job!

I just sold my 147 about an hour ago, but to compensate i now drive a very good nick 2005 GT, basically a 147 in a sexy dress and trackshoes smile
Congrats!
thumbup

Vitorio

4,296 posts

144 months

Friday 13th July 2018
quotequote all
RicksAlfas said:
Congrats!
thumbup
Thanks mate!

Im very happy to see stew keep the 147 though, love this thread, love 147s

RicksAlfas

13,408 posts

245 months

Friday 13th July 2018
quotequote all
I loved our 147 right up until the water pump seized just as I'd shaken hands with it's new owner...
banghead

stewjohnst

Original Poster:

2,442 posts

162 months

Friday 13th July 2018
quotequote all
RicksAlfas said:
I loved our 147 right up until the water pump seized just as I'd shaken hands with it's new owner...
banghead
You can tell me off but I’m not getting the water pump changed with the belts...the difference between £460 and £520 on essentially a shed (albeit one in very fond of) couldn’t be justified and taking advice from the specialist it’s going into they rarely see issues so said don’t fuss and do it next time.

He had a yellow Barchetta like I used to so I automatically trust any advice given biggrin

In other news, I cleaned up the gooey window switch with nothing more than baby wipes and elbow grease, the accepted wisdom for doing this is to use isopropyl alcohol so god knows what goes in baby wipes...

Before


After


I have Sunday to myself so updates to include changing all the door cards, oil and whatever else I get done before the family descend on me again.

RicksAlfas

13,408 posts

245 months

Saturday 14th July 2018
quotequote all
Our water pump had done 50,000 miles, but it was on a JTD. The water pump seized but thankfully the belt kept going. How, I don’t know. When the mechanic got in there it was just a mass of rubber dust! To change or not to change, it’s a Dirty Harry question.

Good job on the switch panel. thumbup