BMW X5 45e hybrid

Author
Discussion

aponting389

741 posts

179 months

Monday 17th August 2020
quotequote all
BrettMRC said:
Utter madness not plugging it in IMO, why bother with a hybrid at all?
The low BIK. It makes perfect sense, why bother using his own electricity when he gets fuel for free?

BrettMRC

Original Poster:

4,112 posts

161 months

Monday 17th August 2020
quotequote all
aponting389 said:
BrettMRC said:
Utter madness not plugging it in IMO, why bother with a hybrid at all?
The low BIK. It makes perfect sense, why bother using his own electricity when he gets fuel for free?
There's a couple of reasons...

1) It's missing the point of the vehicle to not charge it, especially with the bigger ones.
2) Charging them is not expensive.
3) Hauling around half a ton of motors and batteries just to burn even more fuel "just because you can" is feckless.

If the poster above has no charging options at all then maybe I can see where he is coming from a bit, but still seems utterly wrong.

Edited by BrettMRC on Monday 17th August 11:34

aponting389

741 posts

179 months

Monday 17th August 2020
quotequote all
BrettMRC said:
There's a couple of reasons...

1) It's missing the point of the vehicle to not charge it, especially with the bigger ones.
2) Charging them is not expensive.
3) Hauling around half a ton on motors and batteries just to burn even more fuel "just because you can" is feckless.

If the poster above has no charging options at all then maybe I can see where he is coming from a bit, but still seems utterly wrong.
Reasonable points but I would say “because it’s cheaper” not “because you can”

GL123

74 posts

102 months

Monday 17th August 2020
quotequote all
It's complete madness that's what I'm saying. The government make these things very cheap as a company car (the BMW is roughly the same BIK as a 1 litre Fiesta), I don't pay for fuel but there is no way to claim the cost of electricity back. Therefore very few company car drivers ever plug in, and that's where most of these vehicles are going currently. I'd rather a V6 or V8 diesel...

Scrump

22,076 posts

159 months

Monday 17th August 2020
quotequote all
I always plugged in my PHEV company car, as do others from my company. We get paid per mile rather than having a fuel card so it is financially beneficial for us to use electricity where we can.
So it is not only a few company car drivers who plug in, depends on whether they have a fuel card or are reimbursed per mile.

BrettMRC

Original Poster:

4,112 posts

161 months

Monday 17th August 2020
quotequote all
GL123 said:
It's complete madness that's what I'm saying. The government make these things very cheap as a company car (the BMW is roughly the same BIK as a 1 litre Fiesta), I don't pay for fuel but there is no way to claim the cost of electricity back. Therefore very few company car drivers ever plug in, and that's where most of these vehicles are going currently. I'd rather a V6 or V8 diesel...
Have you ever plugged it in?

Surprised the company doesn't provide a charging facility!

GL123

74 posts

102 months

Monday 17th August 2020
quotequote all
Fair point, but I'd bet on a run from Manchester to Bristol the diesel V8 of an SQ7 would use less fuel, with lower emissions whilst sounding a million times better than 4 pot. But cost you 5 times more BIK.

GL123

74 posts

102 months

Monday 17th August 2020
quotequote all
BrettMRC said:
Have you ever plugged it in?

Surprised the company doesn't provide a charging facility!
I work from home and travel regularly around the UK. Car is in car port on gated drive next to a plug socket. I plugged it in once but didn't bother again because anything more than light throttle kicks the ICE in. Probably because it's so heavy as its full of batteries....

BrettMRC

Original Poster:

4,112 posts

161 months

Monday 17th August 2020
quotequote all
GL123 said:
I work from home and travel regularly around the UK. Car is in car port on gated drive next to a plug socket. I plugged it in once but didn't bother again because anything more than light throttle kicks the ICE in. Probably because it's so heavy as its full of batteries....
The 45e is a very different beast in that regard smile

GL123

74 posts

102 months

Monday 17th August 2020
quotequote all
BrettMRC said:
The 45e is a very different beast in that regard smile
Looking forward to trying it smile

Geekman

2,867 posts

147 months

Monday 17th August 2020
quotequote all
Not Ideal said:
Just got back from my France trip in my 40e. Stats aren't toooo bad.

2100 miles
48h
24.8mpg
44.2mph

I think the mpg isn't bad considering it had 4x people and 3x suitcases in it for the most part. I think it suffers at the 85-95 leptons mark because its only got a small 2l 4cyl engine which does about 2200-2500 rpm at those speeds which means its working quite hard. I imagine the newer 45e does better at that speed on a long run because it is a 6cyl ?

Edited by Not Ideal on Tuesday 4th August 06:58
I don't want to come across as being a typical PH member with nothing positive to say, but those figures seem very poor to me. My much older supercharged range rover sport would get 22-23MPG on a run like that at 80-85MPH, and my even older XJR around 28-30MPG. Neither are cars designed with economy in mind, so it seems bizarre that a far more modern hybrid would do anything other than comprehensively beat them. It seems that from a purely environmental perspective, unless you're only doing short, town based journeys, these don't make much sense (tax savings excluded of course), or am I missing something?

Not Ideal

2,901 posts

189 months

Tuesday 18th August 2020
quotequote all
Geekman said:
Not Ideal said:
Just got back from my France trip in my 40e. Stats aren't toooo bad.

2100 miles
48h
24.8mpg
44.2mph

I think the mpg isn't bad considering it had 4x people and 3x suitcases in it for the most part. I think it suffers at the 85-95 leptons mark because its only got a small 2l 4cyl engine which does about 2200-2500 rpm at those speeds which means its working quite hard. I imagine the newer 45e does better at that speed on a long run because it is a 6cyl ?

Edited by Not Ideal on Tuesday 4th August 06:58
I don't want to come across as being a typical PH member with nothing positive to say, but those figures seem very poor to me. My much older supercharged range rover sport would get 22-23MPG on a run like that at 80-85MPH, and my even older XJR around 28-30MPG. Neither are cars designed with economy in mind, so it seems bizarre that a far more modern hybrid would do anything other than comprehensively beat them. It seems that from a purely environmental perspective, unless you're only doing short, town based journeys, these don't make much sense (tax savings excluded of course), or am I missing something?
No problem - all polite discussion is good ! Yes as I mentioned the engine is small and working hard on the motorway which BMW fixed with the 45e and gave it a 6cyl which adds weight but makes for a better all round package than my 40e. If I was bombing around on motorways all day/every day then these 4x4 hybrids make little sense. For me living in central London with occasional motorway use but mainly used in town I get other benefits and it works.

BrettMRC

Original Poster:

4,112 posts

161 months

Tuesday 18th August 2020
quotequote all
^What he said smile

The 45e is currently the best 4x4 PHEV in terms of combined range, but none of the PHEVs will be as good as a decent diesel on repeated long journeys.

With the pandemic I've not yet had an opportunity to do my semi-regular Scotland runs which would give a good indication as to MPG without a charge at one leg of the trip. (Although if you look at my C350e thread, it's not always that cut and dried on long trips with PHEVs... https://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&... )


Edited by BrettMRC on Tuesday 18th August 08:08

timbobalob

335 posts

243 months

Tuesday 18th August 2020
quotequote all
I got my MY20 XC90 T8 in June this year and currently getting 32.7 mpg on average - I would have preferred the X5 45e with a 6 cylinder but need the 7 seats!

I had a Skoda Kodiaq before which averaged 38 mpg over 90k miles, so in my mind it's not a huge amount worse for something that costs me less BIK!

I can run the charging through the business, but for the first year Volvo refund the cost (calculated through the app). I generally keep it plugged in most nights as there is something quite satisfying about wafting around in silence for the shorter journeys.

As much as I like the car and despite the design (inside and out) being quite timeless, it's starting to show it's age against cars like yours

Magnum 475

3,552 posts

133 months

Tuesday 18th August 2020
quotequote all
BrettMRC said:
GL123 said:
It's complete madness that's what I'm saying. The government make these things very cheap as a company car (the BMW is roughly the same BIK as a 1 litre Fiesta), I don't pay for fuel but there is no way to claim the cost of electricity back. Therefore very few company car drivers ever plug in, and that's where most of these vehicles are going currently. I'd rather a V6 or V8 diesel...
Have you ever plugged it in?

Surprised the company doesn't provide a charging facility!
I was looking to change to a plug-in hybrid before lock down. I was only really considering two options, the BMW 330e and Mercedes C350e. Talking to both BMW and Mercedes dealers I was told that most people who have these as company cars never plug them in, and they're coming back to the dealer end of lease with the charging cables unused. People are only getting them due to the lower BIK.

BrettMRC

Original Poster:

4,112 posts

161 months

Tuesday 18th August 2020
quotequote all
I've heard a few similar stories, but only seen one real life example of a non-charged one. (A family member purchased a second hand c350e that was showing a 34mpg av over 20k)

GL123

74 posts

102 months

Tuesday 18th August 2020
quotequote all
Geekman said:
I don't want to come across as being a typical PH member with nothing positive to say, but those figures seem very poor to me. My much older supercharged range rover sport would get 22-23MPG on a run like that at 80-85MPH, and my even older XJR around 28-30MPG. Neither are cars designed with economy in mind, so it seems bizarre that a far more modern hybrid would do anything other than comprehensively beat them. It seems that from a purely environmental perspective, unless you're only doing short, town based journeys, these don't make much sense (tax savings excluded of course), or am I missing something?
That's my thoughts exactly this BIK thing will inevitably be a blunt instrument but most company car drivers do above average mileage on motorways where these hybrids are far less economical than around town. However I'll stop complaining and shut up as I'll pay the same BIK on a 400bhp £80 grand car as a 1l Fiesta....

BrettMRC

Original Poster:

4,112 posts

161 months

Tuesday 1st September 2020
quotequote all

bolidemichael

13,907 posts

202 months

Tuesday 1st September 2020
quotequote all
BrettMRC said:
Harry's done an update:

Much more presentable smile

custardkid

2,514 posts

225 months

Tuesday 1st September 2020
quotequote all
After ordering in January mine in now in the country, but held up with the battery / weld spot issue
Doh!

Looking on line it looks like the open pore wood is no longer available?... So looks like it'll be fairly unique!

How is yours going?
Are you getting the same 50:50 battery : fuel miles as Harry?