Jaguar F-Pace Non Runner

Jaguar F-Pace Non Runner

Author
Discussion

ConnectionError

1,784 posts

70 months

Sunday 21st April
quotequote all
CornedBeef said:
OP, as you're handy with spanners - could you get the 3 litre diesel and install it? They seem to be far more reliable. Obvs if it's a keeper only.
Crankshaft

M4cruiser

3,654 posts

151 months

Sunday 21st April
quotequote all
Escy, I'm loving this thread, but I feel a bit guilty feeding myself on all your woes. wink

Ever thought of getting a job in a JLR workshop - you know more about these things now than they do.



Heaveho

5,307 posts

175 months

Sunday 21st April
quotequote all
I find this thread heartbreaking and it's not even my car or problem.

LunarOne

5,219 posts

138 months

Sunday 21st April
quotequote all
Yes, heartbreaking. The way I see it, you now you have four options.

A. Sell on as is - lowest return for lowest effort.
B. Break it down and sell parts - high effort but better return and will take ages and be mentally painful
C. Put a new/replacement engine in it and sell - probably best return/effort ratio
D. Put a new/replacement engine in it and then keep it.

Given that both you and your wife seem to like the actual car and that all the problems seem to stem from a bad engine that was bodged and bodged and bodged again, I would have thought that a known-good unfettled engine from an accident damaged car would give you peace of mind and you'll get to keep a car that you like. I don't believe that every one of these engined grenades itself. You never hear stories of cars where the owner doesn't experience problems. You only hear of it when something goes wrong. Having seen your work I have no doubt that you could replace the engine in about as much time as it would take me to do a brake job!

If none of those will work, how about a bit of a reversal by putting a Boxster engine in it!

sdh2903

544 posts

173 months

Monday 22nd April
quotequote all
Although I can see the theory of replacing the engine being a valid one. But, knowing that these engines have multiple weak points how do you know you're getting a decent lump? Unless you know the history of the car you've no clue if ones been bodged previously or has an impending issue. Most breakers will give a short warranty but most will also invalidate that warranty if you start removing covers to try and ascertain its condition internally.

And this isn't a 200 quid mx5 engine you'd take a punt on its 3-4k.

If you were looking at keeping long term and replacing the engine surely the only feasible option is a rebuilt unit or buying a cheap one and fully rebuilding from scratch? Therefore knowing exactly what you have. Otherwise you're constantly going to be worrying about it going pop again.

Whatever you decide is going to be a tough one. But thank you for posting all of your trials and tribulations with this, no matter how gutting it may be.

Vsix and Vtec

637 posts

19 months

Monday 22nd April
quotequote all
ConnectionError said:
Crankshaft
This fault seems significantly more common when used in a Land rover product rather than Jaguar.

Mikebentley

6,121 posts

141 months

Monday 22nd April
quotequote all
Vsix and Vtec said:
ConnectionError said:
Crankshaft
This fault seems significantly more common when used in a Land rover product rather than Jaguar.
I wasn’t aware the 2.0 Ingenium diesel suffered crankshaft issues. I think it’s someone just shouting “crankshaft” into the air because a certain 3.0 V6 JLR lump had some crankshaft issues. I’m in admiration of the OPs skills and fortitude. Maybe PH towers could use their powers and influence to get him a lump from JLR gratis. He clearly loves the cars design etc and has given us one of PHs best threads in years. He should be paid for his content.

zalrak

388 posts

86 months

Monday 22nd April
quotequote all
According to this website their could be secondary damage to the bottom end due to plastic particles from worn guides causing blockages. I have no idea if it is true/common though:

https://www.kmotors.co.uk/common-faults/2-0-ingeni...

ConnectionError

1,784 posts

70 months

Monday 22nd April
quotequote all
Mikebentley said:
Vsix and Vtec said:
ConnectionError said:
Crankshaft
This fault seems significantly more common when used in a Land rover product rather than Jaguar.
I wasn’t aware the 2.0 Ingenium diesel suffered crankshaft issues. I think it’s someone just shouting “crankshaft” into the air because a certain 3.0 V6 JLR lump had some crankshaft issues. I’m in admiration of the OPs skills and fortitude. Maybe PH towers could use their powers and influence to get him a lump from JLR gratis. He clearly loves the cars design etc and has given us one of PHs best threads in years. He should be paid for his content.
There was suggestion on the post above mine to swop the 2.0L to a 3.0L diesel "as they are more reliable".

As an owner of a RRS with the 3.0l diesel and a broken crankshaft I was pointing out that they also have issues, namely the crankshaft

MDifficult

2,055 posts

186 months

Monday 22nd April
quotequote all
I'm really struggling with the 'buy another engine' unless it's to then stick it in and get shot of the whole thing.

I mentioned the 'sunk cost fallacy' before and buying another engine and then keeping the car, in the hope it'll offer the best financial result, is a classic case. Where will this engine come from? Who know's what state it'll be in? What are the odds that it'll be cheap enough to be economical to buy but good enough quality to last another 20k miles without any issues? 30k? 50k? All the evidence thus far here seems to suggest the chances of putting in an engine and then having no major problems are close to zero. As other's have said, if it was £1k for an engine then maybe, but £3-£4k for one makes it a whole different prospect.

Get shot now, or get an engine in, cross your fingers, and then get shot. Keeping going is just throwing good money after bad and I'd hate to see it go that way for such a fantastic guy.

Mikebentley

6,121 posts

141 months

Monday 22nd April
quotequote all
But what’s an F Pace with no engine worth? We know the OP can fit it himself so the purchase cost would likely be added to the possible value without the costs of paying for the labour on the swap.
He would then have an infinitely easier sell getting rid as the pool of buyers is much larger.

Aluminati

2,510 posts

59 months

Monday 22nd April
quotequote all
Sometimes you just have to wipe your mouth and walk away, I think this may be one.

If you can get some recovery breaking it, that’s what I would do.

MDifficult

2,055 posts

186 months

Monday 22nd April
quotequote all
Mikebentley said:
But what’s an F Pace with no engine worth? We know the OP can fit it himself so the purchase cost would likely be added to the possible value without the costs of paying for the labour on the swap.
He would then have an infinitely easier sell getting rid as the pool of buyers is much larger.
I agree - I'm just saying 'don't keep it' once the engine is in. As soon as it starts up, stick it on eBay and be done with it.

skwdenyer

16,524 posts

241 months

Monday 22nd April
quotequote all
ConnectionError said:
There was suggestion on the post above mine to swop the 2.0L to a 3.0L diesel "as they are more reliable".

As an owner of a RRS with the 3.0l diesel and a broken crankshaft I was pointing out that they also have issues, namely the crankshaft
Is the 3.0l Ingenium, or the previous Lion V6?

Vsix and Vtec

637 posts

19 months

Monday 22nd April
quotequote all
skwdenyer said:
Is the 3.0l Ingenium, or the previous Lion V6?
Ingenium never came in anything other than an inline 4 I think. Lion V6 3.0 seems to be (other than the usual DPF and EGR niggles of a modern diesel) a reasonably good engine when not in a Land Rover. I don't understand quite why they suffer so much outside of a Jaguar engine bay.

Mikebentley

6,121 posts

141 months

Monday 22nd April
quotequote all
Vsix and Vtec said:
skwdenyer said:
Is the 3.0l Ingenium, or the previous Lion V6?
Ingenium never came in anything other than an inline 4 I think. Lion V6 3.0 seems to be (other than the usual DPF and EGR niggles of a modern diesel) a reasonably good engine when not in a Land Rover. I don't understand quite why they suffer so much outside of a Jaguar engine bay.
I had previously the SD V6 3.0 Diesel in an L494 RRS and they did have a reputation for crankshaft failure ( although somewhat over exaggerated) . The last L494 RRS were fitted with the straight 6 Ingenium 3.0 Diesel which is the same as I have in my Defender. I don’t believe there are any issues with this engine. It wouldn’t be suitable for the OPs case though.

I believe OP should chuck in a new engine and sell it otherwise he will have a long time parting it out and no doubt be left with a load of bits. Give it an organ transplant and get rid quickly and move on.

Stick Legs

4,930 posts

166 months

Monday 22nd April
quotequote all
A friend of mind has an F-Pace in which has snapped it’s timing chain.

If they decide to go the new / 2nd hand engine route I will let you know asap.

sam.rog

765 posts

79 months

Monday 22nd April
quotequote all
Is it cost effective to buy another jlr product that uses the same engine and breaking that?
Would a xf be a cheaper to buy and part out?

stevemcs

8,674 posts

94 months

Monday 22nd April
quotequote all
MDifficult said:
I agree - I'm just saying 'don't keep it' once the engine is in. As soon as it starts up, stick it on eBay and be done with it.
If your going to put an engine in it then keep it, if the aim is to stick it on ebay do it without spending money on it.

silentbrown

8,851 posts

117 months

Monday 22nd April
quotequote all
AIUI, it's cost you £13K+ for about 10,000 miles. (so, significantly lower depreciation than a Taycan...)

WBAC are only offering ~£8K for a runner, but will doubtless chip you down further for the bumper scuffs, etc..

If you can get £5K+ for it as a non-runner, I'd take it and move on. A "new" engine is just rolling the dice one more time, but as we know, the JLR dice are loaded.