1988 VW Caddy with McLaren 650S engine
Discussion
shalmaneser said:
Could you use a 996/997 front end too? Is there a benefit from getting 'matching' suspension designs front and rear?
Cool project.
This is probably the route we’ll go down actually. Will need a fair bit of rework and we’ve been discussing at what stage we’d go for it. Advantage of keeping it original for now is that we’ve got all the bits to bolt on which allow it to roll and turn and stop and bounce so we can focus on the rear end but it’s not overlooked.Cool project.
Great pics - thanks! Loving this project!
The British version of: https://suchen.mobile.de/fahrzeuge/details.html?id...
The British version of: https://suchen.mobile.de/fahrzeuge/details.html?id...
Wheelspinning said:
Everytime I get disillusioned by PH due to constant bickering and races to post how crap every feature car is, along comes threads like this and the Aston one reminding you of what PH was originally about.
As soon as I seen that mac engine sitting in the rear of a caddy a huge smile appeared on my face!
Bravo sir; I'm in.
+1….. The Lexspace thread, the Aston thread and the guy trying to make his own Maclaren F1 replica are all bonkers and some of the best threads on here. As soon as I seen that mac engine sitting in the rear of a caddy a huge smile appeared on my face!
Bravo sir; I'm in.
That and the guy (poppopbagbang) who maintains/modifies old F1 cars for a living and runs a very highly modified 996.
shalmaneser said:
Could you use a 996/997 front end too? Is there a benefit from getting 'matching' suspension designs front and rear?
Cool project.
This is probably the route we’ll go down actually. Will need a fair bit of rework and we’ve been discussing at what stage we’d go for it. Advantage of keeping it original for now is that we’ve got all the bits to bolt on which allow it to roll and turn and stop and bounce so we can focus on the rear end but it’s not overlooked.Cool project.
McL.VW said:
shalmaneser said:
Could you use a 996/997 front end too? Is there a benefit from getting 'matching' suspension designs front and rear?
Cool project.
This is probably the route we’ll go down actually. Will need a fair bit of rework and we’ve been discussing at what stage we’d go for it. Advantage of keeping it original for now is that we’ve got all the bits to bolt on which allow it to roll and turn and stop and bounce so we can focus on the rear end but it’s not overlooked.Cool project.
I assume it would work ok with the widened rear end...
shalmaneser said:
It's a nice compact unit with a decent aluminium subframe so should be pretty easy to bolt up. Might be better to go with a later 997 assembly as it's a pain to get bigger discs on the 9x6 stuff.
I assume it would work ok with the widened rear end...
Yes I’ve looked at a few pictures. Good to know about the brakes though - thank you.I assume it would work ok with the widened rear end...
The rear end is about 40mm narrowed compared to a standards 996 - I used the carriers and not any of the ‘subframe’ structures. I might be able to do the same at the front to nip a little bit of width out of that end too, to match. Providing i can also take it from the steering rack/track rods while also not mess up the roll or bump steer geometry too negatively!
Something on the drawing board for sure.
Pepperpots said:
I like the yellow one but I can't work out where the gearbox is. It looks like the engine is right over the back axle, maybe just my eyes...
Could be a classic Saab 99/900 type solution, with transaxle under engine with a chain drive? Or gearbox ahead of engine, chain drive down, then short shaft back to the diff?The Oldsmobile Toronado transmission is probably most likely:
Gassing Station | Readers' Cars | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff