Best tyres for 987 Boxster S?
Discussion
I think Michelin is always the default answer and I used to religiously fit them to my 996 and recommend them to anyone that would listen.
My Spyder came supplied new with Bridgestones though. I genuinely have no complaints about their performance and drive the Spyder no gentler than my old car. The 996 used to need a set of rears within 10k miles without fail. My Spyder is on 16k and there is plenty of life left on them. I am really pleased about this - I think some people with Pirellis have been getting through them in less than 6k miles in Spyders (Zyp?) so I think it's the tyre rather than the car that makes the difference if that makes sense.
My Spyder came supplied new with Bridgestones though. I genuinely have no complaints about their performance and drive the Spyder no gentler than my old car. The 996 used to need a set of rears within 10k miles without fail. My Spyder is on 16k and there is plenty of life left on them. I am really pleased about this - I think some people with Pirellis have been getting through them in less than 6k miles in Spyders (Zyp?) so I think it's the tyre rather than the car that makes the difference if that makes sense.
Thanks Rob; that makes good sense. I had Pirelli P-Zeros in my Impreza Turbo and a set of four were done in less than 12,000 miles!
Had Pilot Sports on my e46 M3 and the generic ones, (without the BMW star mark) had great grip but rears did less than 10k, fronts twice that. the last set were star marked Pilot Sports and lasted twice as long but traction was terrible so the specific compound must have been very different and I guess the manufacturer makes a decision about longevity v grip.
I going to stick (in both senses of the word) with N marked Pilot Sports on my soon to arrive Boxster.
Had Pilot Sports on my e46 M3 and the generic ones, (without the BMW star mark) had great grip but rears did less than 10k, fronts twice that. the last set were star marked Pilot Sports and lasted twice as long but traction was terrible so the specific compound must have been very different and I guess the manufacturer makes a decision about longevity v grip.
I going to stick (in both senses of the word) with N marked Pilot Sports on my soon to arrive Boxster.
smiffy555 said:
RE050's here too - they have quite a stiff sidewall which makes the handling feel a lot sharper - wear rate is good too (as in they don't wear)
The wear rate is good because the compound of the tyre is harder than MPS. I found this resulted in less grip in cold conditions than with the Michelins.Trev450 said:
smiffy555 said:
RE050's here too - they have quite a stiff sidewall which makes the handling feel a lot sharper - wear rate is good too (as in they don't wear)
The wear rate is good because the compound of the tyre is harder than MPS. I found this resulted in less grip in cold conditions than with the Michelins.BIRMA said:
Trev450 said:
smiffy555 said:
RE050's here too - they have quite a stiff sidewall which makes the handling feel a lot sharper - wear rate is good too (as in they don't wear)
The wear rate is good because the compound of the tyre is harder than MPS. I found this resulted in less grip in cold conditions than with the Michelins.Trev450 said:
BIRMA said:
Trev450 said:
smiffy555 said:
RE050's here too - they have quite a stiff sidewall which makes the handling feel a lot sharper - wear rate is good too (as in they don't wear)
The wear rate is good because the compound of the tyre is harder than MPS. I found this resulted in less grip in cold conditions than with the Michelins.Gassing Station | Porsche General | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff