Best tyres for 987 Boxster S?

Best tyres for 987 Boxster S?

Author
Discussion

Wollemi

Original Poster:

326 posts

133 months

Wednesday 24th April 2013
quotequote all
Of the N rated tyres on offer which are the best option for a Boxster S (Gen II) 987 on 19s?

MadMark911

1,754 posts

150 months

Wednesday 24th April 2013
quotequote all
Michelin Pilot Sport 2's - no question! smile

rob.kellock

2,213 posts

193 months

Wednesday 24th April 2013
quotequote all
I think Michelin is always the default answer and I used to religiously fit them to my 996 and recommend them to anyone that would listen.

My Spyder came supplied new with Bridgestones though. I genuinely have no complaints about their performance and drive the Spyder no gentler than my old car. The 996 used to need a set of rears within 10k miles without fail. My Spyder is on 16k and there is plenty of life left on them. I am really pleased about this - I think some people with Pirellis have been getting through them in less than 6k miles in Spyders (Zyp?) so I think it's the tyre rather than the car that makes the difference if that makes sense.

Wollemi

Original Poster:

326 posts

133 months

Wednesday 24th April 2013
quotequote all
Thanks Rob; that makes good sense. I had Pirelli P-Zeros in my Impreza Turbo and a set of four were done in less than 12,000 miles!
Had Pilot Sports on my e46 M3 and the generic ones, (without the BMW star mark) had great grip but rears did less than 10k, fronts twice that. the last set were star marked Pilot Sports and lasted twice as long but traction was terrible so the specific compound must have been very different and I guess the manufacturer makes a decision about longevity v grip.
I going to stick (in both senses of the word) with N marked Pilot Sports on my soon to arrive Boxster.

rob.kellock

2,213 posts

193 months

Wednesday 24th April 2013
quotequote all
You won't go wrong with them.

Make sure you post a picture of your new car up once it lands, the forum demands it!

FarQue

2,336 posts

199 months

Thursday 25th April 2013
quotequote all
I'm a bit of a RE050a convert too . Whilst stuck with N compliance I'm happy to recommend them after 10,000 miles on a 997.

smiffy555

273 posts

145 months

Thursday 25th April 2013
quotequote all
RE050's here too - they have quite a stiff sidewall which makes the handling feel a lot sharper - wear rate is good too (as in they don't wear)

Ian_UK1

1,514 posts

195 months

Thursday 25th April 2013
quotequote all
The only downside I've read about, regarding the Bridgestone, is weight. They're apparently a good pound or few heavier than the equivalent Michelin. This adds both to un-sprung weight and rotational inertia, but to what extent this can be felt, I honestly don't know.

Trev450

6,326 posts

173 months

Thursday 25th April 2013
quotequote all
smiffy555 said:
RE050's here too - they have quite a stiff sidewall which makes the handling feel a lot sharper - wear rate is good too (as in they don't wear)
The wear rate is good because the compound of the tyre is harder than MPS. I found this resulted in less grip in cold conditions than with the Michelins.

BIRMA

3,810 posts

195 months

Thursday 25th April 2013
quotequote all
Trev450 said:
smiffy555 said:
RE050's here too - they have quite a stiff sidewall which makes the handling feel a lot sharper - wear rate is good too (as in they don't wear)
The wear rate is good because the compound of the tyre is harder than MPS. I found this resulted in less grip in cold conditions than with the Michelins.
Would it be fair to say that if it is case that they are a bit harder they would last a bit longer on track where the temperatures tend to go up a lot during the summer months.

Trev450

6,326 posts

173 months

Thursday 25th April 2013
quotequote all
BIRMA said:
Trev450 said:
smiffy555 said:
RE050's here too - they have quite a stiff sidewall which makes the handling feel a lot sharper - wear rate is good too (as in they don't wear)
The wear rate is good because the compound of the tyre is harder than MPS. I found this resulted in less grip in cold conditions than with the Michelins.
Would it be fair to say that if it is case that they are a bit harder they would last a bit longer on track where the temperatures tend to go up a lot during the summer months.
That is quite possible, however, harder compound road tyres have less flex in the tread blocks and this can result in chunking or bits of the tread blocks breaking off.

BIRMA

3,810 posts

195 months

Thursday 25th April 2013
quotequote all
Trev450 said:
BIRMA said:
Trev450 said:
smiffy555 said:
RE050's here too - they have quite a stiff sidewall which makes the handling feel a lot sharper - wear rate is good too (as in they don't wear)
The wear rate is good because the compound of the tyre is harder than MPS. I found this resulted in less grip in cold conditions than with the Michelins.
Would it be fair to say that if it is case that they are a bit harder they would last a bit longer on track where the temperatures tend to go up a lot during the summer months.
That is quite possible, however, harder compound road tyres have less flex in the tread blocks and this can result in chunking or bits of the tread blocks breaking off.
I'm in a bit of a quandry about tyres on my Boxster S. It came with new Bridgestones and so far with only road use I have no complaints. I do plan to take the car on a few trackdays this year and I'm not sure what to replace them with as a couple of good trackdays will see them well worn. The car came with 18 months balance of the Porsche warranty still running so will have to keep with N rated tyres despite reading and hearing how good Pilot Super Sports are and I'm guessing that unless you are a track-day god like Hammond you probably wouldn't know the difference.