60mph on Snake Pass nip
Discussion
Just a hypothetical question obviously,
If someone were to receive a nip for this, As far as I'm aware there is no fixed camera on the Ladybower to Glossop section so this must have been a mobile unit? Do they have to be marked police vehicles?
You can request photographic evidence, which would be interesting. I presume asking for this has no negative impact on any potential case?
Cheers for any reply.
If someone were to receive a nip for this, As far as I'm aware there is no fixed camera on the Ladybower to Glossop section so this must have been a mobile unit? Do they have to be marked police vehicles?
You can request photographic evidence, which would be interesting. I presume asking for this has no negative impact on any potential case?
Cheers for any reply.
Police car, mobile van, helicopter., just an officer with a 'hair dryer', or from the back of a horse box or even what looks like a builders van
No need to be marked at all for any of those
You can request photographs, the Police are under no obligation to supply any until it gets to court and a not guilty plea has been entered, so that can be an expensive fishing trip.
No need to be marked at all for any of those
You can request photographs, the Police are under no obligation to supply any until it gets to court and a not guilty plea has been entered, so that can be an expensive fishing trip.
Edited by The Rookie on Tuesday 24th April 11:40
The Rookie said:
Police car, mobile van, helicopter., just an officer with a 'hair dryer', or from the back of a horse box or even what looks like a builders van
No need to be marked at all for any of those
You can request photographs, the Police are under no obligation to supply any until it gets to court and a not guilty plea has been entered, so that can be an expensive fishing trip.
But speed can't be recorded in a helecopterNo need to be marked at all for any of those
You can request photographs, the Police are under no obligation to supply any until it gets to court and a not guilty plea has been entered, so that can be an expensive fishing trip.
Edited by The Rookie on Tuesday 24th April 11:40
TVR Moneypit said:
speedking31 said:
aka the place where it is safest to overtake and not the bit that the 50 mph limit is intended to control.
Yep. That's their usual hiding spot in what looks a tatty old builders van.Usually vans, I have seen the odd marked car
https://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&...
Grrrrr
Edited by numtumfutunch on Tuesday 24th April 14:37
Well that explains a lot, didn't appreciate just how unscrupulous the police had become with fake builders vans! Maybe we should have the high visibility stickers and blue lights from their vehicles on our cars? No?..... 😋
If they did it from a helicopter, it's definitely worth the effort to get the photos, haha.
It's the only safe stretch to overtake!
If they did it from a helicopter, it's definitely worth the effort to get the photos, haha.
It's the only safe stretch to overtake!
bonesX said:
The Rookie said:
Police car, mobile van, helicopter., just an officer with a 'hair dryer', or from the back of a horse box or even what looks like a builders van
No need to be marked at all for any of those
You can request photographs, the Police are under no obligation to supply any until it gets to court and a not guilty plea has been entered, so that can be an expensive fishing trip.
But speed can't be recorded in a helecopterNo need to be marked at all for any of those
You can request photographs, the Police are under no obligation to supply any until it gets to court and a not guilty plea has been entered, so that can be an expensive fishing trip.
Edited by The Rookie on Tuesday 24th April 11:40
The camera partnerships wouldn't run a helicopter because it wouldn't be profitable, IIRC they cost about £1500 per hour to run in terms of fuel, staff, insurance, etc. So that a lot of speeding fines per hour before it so much as breaks even..........
The Rookie said:
lyonspride said:
So that a lot of speeding fines per hour before it so much as breaks even..........
Well an infinite number seeing as how the Police get nothing at all from fines, or even fixed penalties.....Why would that matter? Makes no difference whether the police get anything or not. The money goes somewhere.
Clearly, even if it were otherwise practical to use a helicopter, the cost would require a hell of a lot of hits to cover it.
You've missed the points, the hits will never cover it as far as the police are concerned as they get nothing from fines or fixed penalties.
They both go to 'central funds' (the treasury) and as its unbudgeted revenue it just reduces the deficit a little.
As for any other crime the Police work is funded by the local government then there is no concept of 'break even' in any other policing, just the same.
They both go to 'central funds' (the treasury) and as its unbudgeted revenue it just reduces the deficit a little.
As for any other crime the Police work is funded by the local government then there is no concept of 'break even' in any other policing, just the same.
The Rookie said:
lyonspride said:
So that a lot of speeding fines per hour before it so much as breaks even..........
Well an infinite number seeing as how the Police get nothing at all from fines, or even fixed penalties.....On top of that they're in bed with the private companies that run the speed awareness courses.
Edited by lyonspride on Tuesday 24th April 16:22
Gassing Station | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff