968CS - Info Required
Discussion
This thread probably dead by now. I ran a 968CS for a couple of years before my 964RS.
The great thing about the 968 is the chassis balance. You really can drift it around beautifully. They are very tyre sensitive though, make sure you've got some good rubber on the back or those drifts will turn into snappy nightmares !
The 964RS is a totally different experience, dominated by that wailing flat six. AS has been mentioned they take a lot more driving & feel weird after say a more conventional car ( front engine RWD ). Once you get the hang of it though, the rewards are great. Brakes fantastic, on a smooth road predictable & iron fisted. Agree with an earlier comment - if it's wet or very bumpy you'd need balls of steel & superglue on your feet & backside to stay with a well driven 968CS.
Domster is spot on - the standard brakes are marginal & do not inspire confidence. Well worth seeking out an M030 car. My car was reliable & reasonable to run , apart from tyres. Good luck.
The great thing about the 968 is the chassis balance. You really can drift it around beautifully. They are very tyre sensitive though, make sure you've got some good rubber on the back or those drifts will turn into snappy nightmares !
The 964RS is a totally different experience, dominated by that wailing flat six. AS has been mentioned they take a lot more driving & feel weird after say a more conventional car ( front engine RWD ). Once you get the hang of it though, the rewards are great. Brakes fantastic, on a smooth road predictable & iron fisted. Agree with an earlier comment - if it's wet or very bumpy you'd need balls of steel & superglue on your feet & backside to stay with a well driven 968CS.
Domster is spot on - the standard brakes are marginal & do not inspire confidence. Well worth seeking out an M030 car. My car was reliable & reasonable to run , apart from tyres. Good luck.
Yeah saw the ad Melv but it doesnt say.
I assume RHD for that £ anyway, coz otherwise its waaaaaaay over priced.
Going back to Porkers with the engines in the wrong end how was your blast in Mr Longs GT3R?? and do you have the insider info ref the beasts replacement???
>> Edited by iguana on Thursday 9th October 22:08
I assume RHD for that £ anyway, coz otherwise its waaaaaaay over priced.
Going back to Porkers with the engines in the wrong end how was your blast in Mr Longs GT3R?? and do you have the insider info ref the beasts replacement???
>> Edited by iguana on Thursday 9th October 22:08
Fair enough Melv, he may get some takers at that level, just I'd have rather have had the mint RHD CS I was offered- with the same miles plus new cams (£2k's worth & all 968's need em at some point) for £12k tho...... just a bugger I didnt have the £ at the time really.
Good to know you are out terrorising the tracks again, look out dancing donkeys Melv von Dr Damp has got his wagon back
ps you running on slicks again?
Good to know you are out terrorising the tracks again, look out dancing donkeys Melv von Dr Damp has got his wagon back
ps you running on slicks again?
Thhom said:
iguana said:
[new cams] all 968's need em at some point)
They don't if they get the cam chain tensioner/pad checked and replaced when required.
It should be checked at every belts service.
I disagree my continental chum, every CS I know of (and this ranges from 40k miles to 100k miles examples) has either had 'em done or has needed 'em done, all coz the teeth on the cams have been shagged.
On S2's yip I agree cams are not an issue, (the chain & tensioner certainly is tho) but as I recall changing the chain & pad is not on the OPC service schedules & it needs clued up specilaists to suggest it.
Well, as the 968-specific cam chain tensioner provides variable valve timing (Variocam) I would think the chain's tension varies to a significantly high degree, so the sprockets may indeed wear out quicker than on S2 cams. Therefore you actually may be right.
Another detail that convinces me out of a 968 ...
>> Edited by Thhom on Friday 10th October 19:05
Another detail that convinces me out of a 968 ...
>> Edited by Thhom on Friday 10th October 19:05
Thhom said:
Well, as the 968-specific cam chain tensioner provides variable valve timing (Variocam) I would think the chain's tension varies to a significantly high degree, so the sprockets may indeed wear out quicker than on S2 cams. Therefore you actually may be right.
Another detail that convinces me out of a 968 ...
>> Edited by Thhom on Friday 10th October 19:05
A good buyers guide (although for the convertible) in this months GT Pretty Pictures, mentions the engine related issues with 968s
Gassing Station | Porsche General | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff