RE: Driven: Porsche 911 Turbo S

RE: Driven: Porsche 911 Turbo S

Author
Discussion

Koln-RS

3,865 posts

212 months

Friday 11th June 2010
quotequote all
And that was the standard Turbo Cab - the Coupe Turbo 'S' must be mind blowing.

tali1

5,266 posts

201 months

Friday 25th June 2010
quotequote all
EVO clocked 60 in 2.9 and 100 in 6.8- if you want to go any quicker then you need a Veyron

996ttalot

1,931 posts

175 months

Friday 25th June 2010
quotequote all
tali1 said:
EVO clocked 60 in 2.9 and 100 in 6.8- if you want to go any quicker then you need a Veyron
No you don't..you need a proto 996tt - I clocked 6.6 at Brunters, and that was on low boost.
But that is still a nice car, but a lot of cash.

Edited by 996ttalot on Friday 25th June 22:40

Carl_Docklands

12,217 posts

262 months

Saturday 26th June 2010
quotequote all

The 0-124mph times for this beast appear to be faster than a McClaren F1. Nuff said!

tali1

5,266 posts

201 months

Sunday 27th June 2010
quotequote all
996ttalot said:
tali1 said:
EVO clocked 60 in 2.9 and 100 in 6.8- if you want to go any quicker then you need a Veyron
No you don't..you need a proto 996tt - I clocked 6.6 at Brunters, and that was on low boost.
But that is still a nice car, but a lot of cash.

Edited by 996ttalot on Friday 25th June 22:40
I should have said any quicker for a New car
Still in relative terms it is good value when you consider the Veyron comparison

996ttalot

1,931 posts

175 months

Sunday 27th June 2010
quotequote all
Iirc, the veyron does 17secs to 186. This will do it in probably 35secs. All 997tt/gt are quick in STD trim to 100, it is after that they are slow. IMO I would rather spend 50-60k having something that is very quick and drivable than 123k. It is a nice car but a lot of money especially compared to the 997tt alone. Headline figures can be misleading.

markcoznottz

7,155 posts

224 months

Sunday 27th June 2010
quotequote all
Seen an article in one of the porsche mags, cant remember which, about the forthcoming RS verion of the GT2. Quick glance i got said it used the 3.6 engine(cant be right surely?), and boosted to 1.6 bar! Any more info forthcoming about this car?.

996ttalot

1,931 posts

175 months

Sunday 27th June 2010
quotequote all
markcoznottz said:
Seen an article in one of the porsche mags, cant remember which, about the forthcoming RS verion of the GT2. Quick glance i got said it used the 3.6 engine(cant be right surely?), and boosted to 1.6 bar! Any more info forthcoming about this car?.
Yes, 3.6 engine, but don't get too hung up on boost - that 1.6 bar is only in certain rev range/gears and won't be for long. It will do 124 in under 10 secs, and is a lot lighter than 997tt s. PTWR = 435hp which is a lot. Price - £164k, and I think only 500 will be made.

mhh

1,558 posts

242 months

Monday 28th June 2010
quotequote all
996ttalot said:
It is a nice car but a lot of money especially compared to the 997tt alone. Headline figures can be misleading.
The S is good value compared to a heavily optioned new Turbo though. Whether or not it is a lot of money depends on how much you've got to spend.

markcoznottz

7,155 posts

224 months

Tuesday 29th June 2010
quotequote all
996ttalot said:
markcoznottz said:
Seen an article in one of the porsche mags, cant remember which, about the forthcoming RS verion of the GT2. Quick glance i got said it used the 3.6 engine(cant be right surely?), and boosted to 1.6 bar! Any more info forthcoming about this car?.
Yes, 3.6 engine, but don't get too hung up on boost - that 1.6 bar is only in certain rev range/gears and won't be for long. It will do 124 in under 10 secs, and is a lot lighter than 997tt s. PTWR = 435hp which is a lot. Price - £164k, and I think only 500 will be made.
So the 3.6 engine is still being manufactured then?. Has the 997GT2 stopped being made now?.

ollysmith

8 posts

165 months

Wednesday 7th July 2010
quotequote all
I will concede that this is a very quick car - I doubt that any other car would be quicker than it on a twisty mountain road whilst still being comfortable and easy to use around town. However, all 911s are just fast Beetles and while being very very fast it is dull, common and there is no personality. Personally I can't see why anyone wouldn't buy a Corvette ZR1 and spend the remaining £20,000 or so on revamping its ghastly plastic-y interior.

IMI A

9,410 posts

201 months

Wednesday 7th July 2010
quotequote all
ollysmith said:
I will concede that this is a very quick car - I doubt that any other car would be quicker than it on a twisty mountain road whilst still being comfortable and easy to use around town. However, all 911s are just fast Beetles and while being very very fast it is dull, common and there is no personality. Personally I can't see why anyone wouldn't buy a Corvette ZR1 and spend the remaining £20,000 or so on revamping its ghastly plastic-y interior.
Whats your steed mate?

lowndes

807 posts

214 months

Wednesday 4th August 2010
quotequote all
Seemed a pity to let this thread lapse without a couple of photos.

Interior may not be to everyone's taste but I'm very happy with it and to some extent see two tone as part of the S signature, along with the Spyder wheels which I probably wouldn't otherwise specify.





Dr S

4,997 posts

226 months

Wednesday 4th August 2010
quotequote all
I love the Spyder wheels

johnycarrera

1,935 posts

230 months

Wednesday 4th August 2010
quotequote all
Think it looks as though it sits a little high due to the wheel design...... Would absolutely love one though and would swap mine in a second, though probably not in ten years time, although hmmmmm maybe ?

911perv

1,415 posts

181 months

Wednesday 4th August 2010
quotequote all
johnycarrera said:
Think it looks as though it sits a little high due to the wheel design...... Would absolutely love one though and would swap mine in a second, though probably not in ten years time, although hmmmmm maybe ?
I agree, the wheels look too small in that pic!

Dagnut

3,515 posts

193 months

Wednesday 4th August 2010
quotequote all
lowndes said:
Seemed a pity to let this thread lapse without a couple of photos.

Interior may not be to everyone's taste but I'm very happy with it and to some extent see two tone as part of the S signature, along with the Spyder wheels which I probably wouldn't otherwise specify.



Enjoy.

Carl_Docklands

12,217 posts

262 months

Wednesday 4th August 2010
quotequote all
lowndes said:
Seemed a pity to let this thread lapse without a couple of photos.

Interior may not be to everyone's taste but I'm very happy with it and to some extent see two tone as part of the S signature, along with the Spyder wheels which I probably wouldn't otherwise specify.
Congrats, any comments on the performance? smile

Broadoaker

10 posts

168 months

Wednesday 4th August 2010
quotequote all
I agree with you about the two-tone interior and Spyder wheels being part of the Turbo S signature. I've opted for black/cream in a Carrara white car with black Spyder wheels. It arrived in the country today and is hopefully now en route to Porsche Reading for me to collect day after tomorrow. Itchy fingers.

Geneve

3,866 posts

219 months

Wednesday 4th August 2010
quotequote all
Carl_Docklands said:
Congrats, any comments on the performance? smile
I've driven about 1000 miles in a Turbo 'S', and it really is gobsmackingly fast. Thought I was used to fast cars, but even after a GT3, it really does take your breath away.