Ford Scrappage Scheme - Deeply Flawed

Ford Scrappage Scheme - Deeply Flawed

Author
Discussion

The_Open_Road

Original Poster:

16 posts

80 months

Wednesday 23rd August 2017
quotequote all
So, Ford has announced a scrappage scheme for any diesel or petrol vehicle registered before 2010. Ford said all of the part-exchanged vehicles will be scrapped, having an immediate effect on air quality.

There are several problems with this scheme:

1) Even classic cars traded in under the scheme would be destroyed. Under the scrappage scheme that the government ran back 2009, lots of rare and unusual classic cars were traded in and subsequently crushed thereby destroying a part of our motoring heritage. among the cars destroyed were 100 Porsches, 81 Morris Minors and 45 Jaguar XJ-Ss. Classic cars traded in under the scheme should be offered for sale to classic car enthusiasts.

2) Even low mileage cars barely over 7 years old and in excellent condition that are traded in under the scheme would be destroyed. These would make a good used buy for people on a limited budget. Meanwhile, even older more polluting cars would remain on the road. Low mileage cars traded in under the scheme should therefore be offered for sale to allow people to trade in even older more polluting cars.

3) The scheme is not as good for the environment as is claimed as a significant proportion of greenhouse gas emissions during the lifetime of a car occurs as part of the manufacturing process.

a

439 posts

84 months

Wednesday 23rd August 2017
quotequote all

Eyersey1234

2,898 posts

79 months

Monday 25th September 2017
quotequote all
[quote=The_Open_Road]So, Ford has announced a scrappage scheme for any diesel or petrol vehicle registered before 2010. Ford said all of the part-exchanged vehicles will be scrapped, having an immediate effect on air quality.

There are several problems with this scheme:

1) Even classic cars traded in under the scheme would be destroyed. Under the scrappage scheme that the government ran back 2009, lots of rare and unusual classic cars were traded in and subsequently crushed thereby destroying a part of our motoring heritage. among the cars destroyed were 100 Porsches, 81 Morris Minors and 45 Jaguar XJ-Ss. Classic cars traded in under the scheme should be offered for sale to classic car enthusiasts.

2) Even low mileage cars barely over 7 years old and in excellent condition that are traded in under the scheme would be destroyed. These would make a good used buy for people on a limited budget. Meanwhile, even older more polluting cars would remain on the road. Low mileage cars traded in under the scheme should therefore be offered for sale to allow people to trade in even older more polluting cars.

3) The scheme is not as good for the environment as is claimed as a significant proportion of greenhouse gas emissions during the lifetime of a car occurs as part of the manufacturing process.[/quote

I agree totally, I've always thought the supposed environmental benefits of a scrappage scheme don't exist.

Nickbrapp

5,277 posts

130 months

Monday 25th September 2017
quotequote all
The manufactures don't give a toss about the environmental impact and protection, it sells more cars.

InitialDave

11,902 posts

119 months

Monday 25th September 2017
quotequote all
Vauxhall made a point of swerving the classic cars issue with their scheme, silly of Ford not to follow suit.

Evanivitch

20,078 posts

122 months

Monday 25th September 2017
quotequote all
The_Open_Road said:
3) The scheme is not as good for the environment as is claimed as a significant proportion of greenhouse gas emissions during the lifetime of a car occurs as part of the manufacturing process.
That's only if you look at the CO2 perspective.

A scrapped car will largely re-enter the materials production chain, the newer car will likely have lower NOx and particulate emissions, and it'll most likely be safer than the previous model

However, none of that is guaranteed unless you make it a term of the policy. And it's especially difficult for Ford given that they lack Hybrid models as even a starting point.

But I agree with your other points, but let's not forget it was a programme to sell new cars, not old ones. There were vested interests in all this.

jj5b

12 posts

79 months

Tuesday 26th September 2017
quotequote all
ford trying to pretend they're passionate about air quality is nearly as funny as when richard branson said it, who owns an airline!

Skodaku

1,805 posts

219 months

Tuesday 10th October 2017
quotequote all
jj5b said:
ford trying to pretend they're passionate about air quality is nearly as funny as when richard branson said it, who owns an airline!
In fact nearly as funny as just about anything R Branson says.

fatjon

2,203 posts

213 months

Monday 16th October 2017
quotequote all
There's no such thing as a scrappage scheme. Whatever discount you can get for weighing in your £150 wreck can also get without weighing it in (as I proved at the Audi dealer last week). Often rather better discounts can be had as they don't have to pay to get rid of your wreck.

When you see the words "scrappage scheme" read "mug catching scheme"

The_Open_Road

Original Poster:

16 posts

80 months

Friday 10th November 2017
quotequote all
Ford agrees not to destroy a classic Standard Ten under its scrappage scheme (but how many other classics have been lost?)

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/cars/classic/ford-fire-...

cylinderfin

95 posts

75 months

Sunday 21st January 2018
quotequote all
I can't imagine any car with TDI, CDI, TDCI or CTDI in it's name being worthy of classic status and saving from a scrappage scheme. They all stink after a few years of use!



Cliftonite

8,408 posts

138 months

Sunday 21st January 2018
quotequote all
The_Open_Road said:
Ford agrees not to destroy a classic Standard Ten under its scrappage scheme (but how many other classics have been lost?)

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/cars/classic/ford-fire-...
How could the finances of this deal possibly stack up to make it worthwhile throwing this car away???


MarkwG

4,848 posts

189 months

Sunday 21st January 2018
quotequote all
Cliftonite said:
How could the finances of this deal possibly stack up to make it worthwhile throwing this car away???
Always been the case with cars located that far away from the urban hubs, hence so many seen rusting on the islands around our coasts. This one was in Thurso, almost as far north as you can get. The number of people prepared to travel to view, then spend the money to bring it home is minute, & it's not worth the costs to the dealer to market it, as the same applies. Better for them to take the Ford bung & flog a Transit to the owner - the car business is economics not emotions. Not saying it's right, but it's how it works.

MrGTI6

3,160 posts

130 months

Thursday 10th May 2018
quotequote all
Eyersey1234 said:
I've always thought the supposed environmental benefits of a scrappage scheme don't exist.
Couldn't agree more. All that talk of improving air quality is total bks.

It's simply an attempt to boost new car sales, the irony being that scrapping perfectly good cars to increase demand for the production of new ones is bad for the environment.

dunc_sx

1,608 posts

197 months

Friday 25th May 2018
quotequote all
Cliftonite said:
How could the finances of this deal possibly stack up to make it worthwhile throwing this car away???
Pretty sure you're getting £7k off the price of a new transit by scrapping your old car.

My GF got £4,500 off of a Ford C-Max for trading in a small car worth approx. £500.

Not saying it's a great deal or anything but certainly something to think about if you are in the market for a van and have an old car kicking about.