RE: MGF X80

Author
Discussion

blobbyblob

Original Poster:

285 months

Tuesday 19th June 2001
quotequote all
Can''t be worse than the original. Might be ok with that drawn front. With 370 hp it had better tip the scales under 1300 kg.

mrtony

105 posts

283 months

Tuesday 19th June 2001
quotequote all
I'll trade my F for one any day ;-)

jamesc

2,820 posts

285 months

Tuesday 19th June 2001
quotequote all
MG are soon to take over as Britain's top sportscar company with cars that people want and are RELIABLE!

AndrewD

7,541 posts

285 months

Tuesday 19th June 2001
quotequote all
So presumably you'll soon be driving an MG then will you James?

hoganscrogan

725 posts

285 months

Tuesday 19th June 2001
quotequote all
If they get it looking good I'm sure it will sell well. Airbags-ABS, 370bhp and 1500kg sounds like a nice combination to me.

PetrolTed

34,429 posts

304 months

Tuesday 19th June 2001
quotequote all
quote:
This car is a carbun copee of the Detomata Managostah.
That's because it's the same car. Geez... going to have to introduce a door policy on the site soon...

elisek

404 posts

283 months

Tuesday 19th June 2001
quotequote all
hello Mangusta is a great car to drive! i owned it for 2 months great chassis better than any one so MG is going to right way just changing the body, everything is already great, just need more than 320bhp, maybe 450 or 500 are better on this amazing chassis!!!!!

speedsix20

78 posts

285 months

Tuesday 19th June 2001
quotequote all
I am wondering if they will keep the Mustang powerplant (would be odd) or opt for the Lotus V8.

jamesc

2,820 posts

285 months

Wednesday 20th June 2001
quotequote all
The Fiat will definitly be replaced by the MG ZR (the one based on the 25). My cousin works for a Rover dealer who already supply performance cars. My sister had one of the early MGFs. Yes I am a MG fan and proud of it. I once owned an MG Metro turbo in 1986 and that was a quick, economical and almost reliable car. The ZR is just the sort of car that BMW should have made!

Dave_H

996 posts

284 months

Wednesday 20th June 2001
quotequote all
quote:
The ZR is just the sort of car that BMW should have made!
Too bad they (BMW) missed the boat and the plot, it's nice to see the designers at MG finally loose to do their thing. I would say BMW didnt realise what they had, but that would be rubbish, they did, that's why they held it back.

apache

39,731 posts

285 months

Wednesday 20th June 2001
quotequote all
if the artists impression looks anything like the real thing then it will be a stonker, if realistically priced. Have to say the original Qvale styling leaves me cold,I think a sportscar should have either MX 5 style cuteness,Griff beauty, Tuscan aggression or Elise single minded purity

wellerp

3 posts

284 months

Wednesday 20th June 2001
quotequote all
Good luck MG, If they can do it it will be one in the eye for BMW.

Wyatt

95 posts

282 months

Wednesday 20th June 2001
quotequote all
One in the eye to the Germans. Good luck It looks great. Will it be an all British engine?

hoganscrogan

725 posts

285 months

Thursday 21st June 2001
quotequote all
It was rumored on Pistonheads that they were looking to use the Lotus V* in the 'ultimate 75' I suppose they would probably use that - hmmm on second thoughts that engine is really expensive, £20k I think AC have to pay for it. American V8 would be a better bet for Rover/MG - reliable and cheap. You can tune most of the Yankke V8's pretty easily to get over 400bhp too. Edited by hoganscrogan on Thursday 21st June 11:35

damnradd

7 posts

283 months

Thursday 21st June 2001
quotequote all
From the front axle back, it looks very much like the new Nissan 'Z'... Especially the 'haunches'.

hoganscrogan

725 posts

285 months

Thursday 21st June 2001
quotequote all
! Just leafing through EVO in WHSmiths and spotted news article about the 'ultimate' rover 75 - looks like they have tied up with Ford and will be fitting a new Ford V8 in it with approx 370hp - hmmm nice & the Mangusta or whatever it is already has a Ford V8 unit fitted.

AuForm

15 posts

275 months

Thursday 21st June 2001
quotequote all
Am I the only one who’s sceptical about a Rover competing with Porsche and Maserati? Luckily it will be sold in NA, where the Rover name is cleaner. But I don’t foresee a great future for it in Europe. And if I’m not mistaken (my data is a few months old), it’s Europe who’s buying the Rover 75. That’s b/c it has great value/money, and everybody is in the market for a luxury sedan. But I don’t know that many people who are in the market for an American V8 2seater, even if it has great value/money.

Dave_H

996 posts

284 months

Thursday 21st June 2001
quotequote all
quote:
Am I the only one who’s sceptical about a Rover competing with Porsche and Maserati? /quote] That silver haired driver with the tartan rug over the back seat image that BMW kindly left them with will soon go, also the name change to MG-Rover will help, in the 50s and 60s before BL got hold of them, the works cars were mixing it with the big boys on the track. Don't get me wrong,I'm all for TVR (I'm now buying one) as MG (already have one)but I think MG are going to disprove a lot of people over the next few years.Be great for the UK to produce loads of great sports cars again.

jamie

132 posts

285 months

Saturday 23rd June 2001
quotequote all
No,No,No,No,No! This is all wrong. The whole MG revival thing is fun, but makes no sense. Tuning a few Honda-derived 200s & 400s (or whatever they are called now) may give MG Rover a boost, but buying Qvale (Qvale is, apparently Italian for 'money pit'!) and sinking what little recorces they have in to is a mistake. Especially when they have no new mainstream cars in the pipelines. It would have been A LOT wiser to spend the money on teaming up with a manufacturer like Dawoo, and develiping a new Focus rival.

EverclearZ

270 months

Thursday 8th November 2001
quotequote all
Just getting started here, but is there anywhere to get more definitive information on bringing MGs to the USA?