RE: Bristol 3S

Author
Discussion

JSG

2,238 posts

284 months

Friday 26th October 2001
quotequote all
3S - can't even spell it right, no wonder it's ugly.

gnomesmith

2,458 posts

277 months

Sunday 28th October 2001
quotequote all
I would have agreed with virtually all of the comments posted but two things have happened in my life that have changed my view. Firstly I grew old(substitute middle aged or grew up if you wish) and secondly I drove a series of Bristols. I'd love a 3S, Bristol's order book suggests I'm not alone.

PS I don't want an Elise, TVR, EVO or Subaru, all good cars but none of them meets my needs in quite the way a Bristol does.

McNab

1,627 posts

275 months

Sunday 28th October 2001
quotequote all
Apart from gnomesmith, has anyone here driven a Bristol?

JPHERSEY

19 posts

272 months

Monday 29th October 2001
quotequote all
why did they paint it with wood primer?
what really offends me is the thick rubber round the windscreen...looks like it was built in a lock-up...

muley

1,453 posts

282 months

Tuesday 30th October 2001
quotequote all
Yes, IHMO it is ugly but it does have a brake servo system (gasp!) not to mention 4 pot calipers (strewth!)

jimbo

125 posts

285 months

Tuesday 30th October 2001
quotequote all
this car can surely only appeal to people that watch re-runs of the professionals, drink party sevens and play twister all day long whilst wearing beige polo-neck jumpers, polyester stay-prest and hush puppies.

ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTY TWO THOUSAND POUNDS - ARE YOU PULLING MY PISSER

Jim

PetrolTed

34,428 posts

304 months

Tuesday 30th October 2001
quotequote all
What's wrong with the Professionals..?

jimbo

125 posts

285 months

Wednesday 31st October 2001
quotequote all
Lets not detract from the important issue here - no matter how good or bad the professionals were, the Bristol has got a face like a slapped arse and should be banished to the seventies from whence it came where it will be at home amongst crimplene flares, slinkys, tank tops and supertramp.

Jim

PetrolTed

34,428 posts

304 months

Wednesday 31st October 2001
quotequote all
What's wrong with tank tops?

McNab

1,627 posts

275 months

Wednesday 31st October 2001
quotequote all
If Setright really owns one you have to think seriously about it. OK, he's a quirky individual, but he would never buy rubbish.

Tony Crook (Bristol) was an effective racer in his time, and knows his engineering perfectly well. Like all small producers of 'hand-built' machinery he has to balance cost against styling, and compromise is inevitable.

I drove a Bristol a while back at the request of it's owner (he wanted me to understand the car's good points), and it was very impressive indeed if looked upon as a 'sporting' luxury conveyance. Much better sorted than the contemporary Bentleys and Rolls-Royces!

PetrolTed

34,428 posts

304 months

Wednesday 31st October 2001
quotequote all
I suspect from the enthusiasm of its owners that it's a good car. Shame it's not as pretty as Bristols of old though.

campbell

2,499 posts

284 months

Wednesday 31st October 2001
quotequote all
What are tank tops ????????

Marshy

2,748 posts

285 months

Wednesday 31st October 2001
quotequote all
Sleeveless pullovers.

Bloody silly idea if you ask me...

marki

15,763 posts

271 months

Wednesday 31st October 2001
quotequote all


Bloody silly idea if you ask me...

wot , tank tops or S3's

Edited by marki on Wednesday 31st October 17:06

williamp

19,262 posts

274 months

Wednesday 31st October 2001
quotequote all
I kinda like it. Ok, so its not an Evo VI, but it was never designed to be. As a qiuet, quick, beautiful built grand tourer it does a fine job.

Ok, so I would'nt own one, though...

JSG

2,238 posts

284 months

Wednesday 31st October 2001
quotequote all
True, it's better looking than an Evo VI.