RE: Will Tories Live Up To Speed Camera Pledge?

RE: Will Tories Live Up To Speed Camera Pledge?

Author
Discussion

renrut

1,478 posts

205 months

Thursday 13th May 2010
quotequote all
Will be interesting to see how this turns out. I suspect what will happen is funding is reduced or removed to the cameras. THe national e-car cahrging scheme will be interesting too. Are they gonna set it up in normal fuel stations? Can't see big voltages and petrol fumes being a clever mix. That said everyone raves about hydrogen cars and thats an even more scary combination.

About the fuel stabilizer I think its a good idea if they set it and don't mess with it. Cos lets face it fuel will never go back to the 70-80p a litre it was 12years ago so any saving would be minimal so this might stop it rising and at least when I buy that V8 I'll know it's still gonna cost me the same to run in a years time.

ArosaMike

4,205 posts

211 months

Thursday 13th May 2010
quotequote all
dandarez said:
Loose_Cannon said:
Wait till they start emptying your pockets! Theirs, and their ilk will not be emptying theirs, they will be filling them.
Edited by dandarez on Thursday 13th May 10:35
Good old Labour spin! I do find it amusing the way that Labour go on about 'Tory Toff's' and fail to mention the fact that they themselves are as bad, if not worse, at trying to profit personally from their time in office. Cameron went to public school...so what?! So did most of Labour. Please don't try and pretend that if you had worked hard to make money and had the opportunity to send your kids to a better school than the crap state school down the road you wouldn't do the same?! Cameron's parents were both hardworking contributers to the country who had every right to earn enough to give their son the best education they could afford. This is not snobbery, it's called hard work!

The real crime is the fact that Labour tax the hell out of everyone and employ so many civil servants and policy writers that they don't have any money left to invest in schools. There's always going to be some people who are wealthier than others. Hard work, motivation and dedication are what get you there....not handouts, complaining and striking!


tobster911

67 posts

180 months

Thursday 13th May 2010
quotequote all
callyman said:
Hopefully this wasn't promised to secure votes.
Swindon have binned their cameras and road safety has remained unchanged as a result.
True, swindon have binned fixed speed cameras - and put the money into mobile units, which now frequent the A419.
I preferred the fixed cameras as they are easy to avoid, now it's not so easy so you have a higher chance of getting points.
It's the average speed cameras and sat tracking are the real concern.

annodomini2

6,862 posts

251 months

Thursday 13th May 2010
quotequote all
jayfish said:
ctallchris said:


* Facilitate the switch to green cars by creating a national car recharging network.
Excellent but we allready have the network in place it's called the national grid. What we need are standards so you dont end up with a thousand sockets and voltages at each one.
National grid? Fine if you live in a house with a drive and your commute is less than half your E-cars range, but not exactly ideal if you live in a flat like i do and often have to park 4 or 5 streets away.

Edited by jayfish on Thursday 13th May 12:14
The national grid wouldn't be able to cope with extra load, not to mention the extra power stations required to compensate.

This would not be a simple task.

keith2.2

1,100 posts

195 months

Thursday 13th May 2010
quotequote all
The idealist in me likes the idea of this 'new dawn'

The realist in me suspects:

Monday:
"Govt. to scrap all planned speed cameras as per election promises"

Tues:
"Govt. begins widespread trial of velocity actuated image capture system using existing infrastructure"

stenniso

350 posts

231 months

Thursday 13th May 2010
quotequote all
We already know that the manifesto pledges can't be relied upon. The National Insurance and Inheritance Tax changes have already been abandoned or watered down.

This whole manifesto thing is interesting. In the last election all parties made a manifesto pledge on a referendum on the EU Constitution. Labour and the Lib Dems weasled out of the pledge, the Conservatives slated them both for doing so. The arguement was that people voted in the election based on the manifesto.

Well this time round I now find that the party that I voted for is also not delivering on the manifesto promises that I voted for. Perhaps we should all get to vote again....

bobda

1,442 posts

234 months

Thursday 13th May 2010
quotequote all
MC Bodge said:
Ideally the 60mph NSL would be reinstated on rural roads, especially those with average speed cameras on.
I wasn't aware that it had changed; http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Motoring/DriverSafety/...

stenniso

350 posts

231 months

Thursday 13th May 2010
quotequote all
callyman said:
Hopefully this wasn't promised to secure votes.
Swindon have binned their cameras and road safety has remained unchanged as a result.
I'd like to see more details on the Swindon situation. A short report in the press last week suggested that accidents rates had not increased since the cameras were switched off, obviously a good thing, and something that can be verified with figures.

A "road safety" campaigner complained that speeds had risen since the cameras had been switched off, which can be seen as a bad thing, although it may also suggest that the increased speed has not increased the number of accidents, weakening any link between speeding as an isolated factor and accident rates. However, I would like to know how the increase in vehicle speeds has been measured, to substantiate the claim by the "safety campaigner". Are they carrying out speed surveys? Or is this just someone's perception?

Without knowing the facts we cannot get a good picture of what is happening on the roads of Swindon.

collateral

7,238 posts

218 months

Thursday 13th May 2010
quotequote all
Believe it when I see it. Politicians will say anything to get elected and then just do whatever they want if they actually get in.

Walton

329 posts

218 months

Thursday 13th May 2010
quotequote all

The simplest and cheapest way to improve traffic flow in this country is to run a national TV campaign telling people not to hog the middle land on the m-way.

Half the population seem unaware you should only use it for overtaking.

alexpa

644 posts

172 months

Thursday 13th May 2010
quotequote all
Blah blah blah. What about uninsured drivers?

They need taking off the road, all 1.7 Million of them. Confiscate car, Minimum £2500 fine out of whatever income.

Ever had an accident with an uninsured driver?

Ever been run over by an uninsured driver?

Mr_Sukebe

375 posts

208 months

Thursday 13th May 2010
quotequote all
I'd love it if you could stop the councils building more bloody speed humps to destroy our car's suspension. I wouldn't mind, but the people it's meant to most discourage (i.e. the nutters), simply use it as an excuse to accelerate as hard as possible in between humps, thus being even less fuel efficient.

ctallchris

1,266 posts

179 months

Thursday 13th May 2010
quotequote all
jayfish said:
ctallchris said:


* Facilitate the switch to green cars by creating a national car recharging network.
Excellent but we allready have the network in place it's called the national grid. What we need are standards so you dont end up with a thousand sockets and voltages at each one.
National grid? Fine if you live in a house with a drive and your commute is less than half your E-cars range, but not exactly ideal if you live in a flat like i do and often have to park 4 or 5 streets away.

Edited by jayfish on Thursday 13th May 12:14
I was thinking more that giving people grants with which to install standardised units where they felt they would be useful rather than having the government decide where they should go pretty much at random

ctallchris

1,266 posts

179 months

Thursday 13th May 2010
quotequote all
annodomini2 said:
jayfish said:
ctallchris said:


* Facilitate the switch to green cars by creating a national car recharging network.
Excellent but we allready have the network in place it's called the national grid. What we need are standards so you dont end up with a thousand sockets and voltages at each one.
National grid? Fine if you live in a house with a drive and your commute is less than half your E-cars range, but not exactly ideal if you live in a flat like i do and often have to park 4 or 5 streets away.

Edited by jayfish on Thursday 13th May 12:14
The national grid wouldn't be able to cope with extra load, not to mention the extra power stations required to compensate.

This would not be a simple task.
the national grid allready runs with enough unused capacity to charge 10 million electric cars.

ScoobieWRX

4,863 posts

226 months

Thursday 13th May 2010
quotequote all
I want to see more coppers on the streets and motorways, period!!
I want to see all uneccessary speed cameras of any sort scrapped apart from those near schools, hospitals, community centres, care homes and OAP complexes.
I want to see a greater number of potholes properly repaired or complete stretches of roads completely replaced with better quality longer lasting tarmac.
I want to see ANPR cameras and their databases used for their original purpose which was to catch terrorists and criminals, and the scum that run cars without tax, MOT or insurance taken off the roads for good, and for private information not to be supplied at any price to those thieving bds passing themselves off as legitimate private car park and wheel clamping operators, stealing our hard earned cash.

There are a load more demands i'm sure others could mention here but these are just a few of mine. It's time genuine tax paying motorists was treated fair and square in return for these past 13yrs of being bled dry every which way they ever wanted.

Johnpidge

588 posts

189 months

Thursday 13th May 2010
quotequote all
2blackhats said:
I'd like to think they will honour their pledges, but I can't help thinking that once in govt the lure of all that lovely money from fines will be too strong to resist.
We shall see...
+1 - spot on Sir!!

Johnpidge

588 posts

189 months

Thursday 13th May 2010
quotequote all
ScoobieWRX said:
I want to see more coppers on the streets and motorways, period!!
I want to see all uneccessary speed cameras of any sort scrapped apart from those near schools, hospitals, community centres, care homes and OAP complexes.
I want to see a greater number of potholes properly repaired or complete stretches of roads completely replaced with better quality longer lasting tarmac.
I want to see ANPR cameras and their databases used for their original purpose which was to catch terrorists and criminals, and the scum that run cars without tax, MOT or insurance taken off the roads for good, and for private information not to be supplied at any price to those thieving bds passing themselves off as legitimate private car park and wheel clamping operators, stealing our hard earned cash.

There are a load more demands i'm sure others could mention here but these are just a few of mine. It's time genuine tax paying motorists was treated fair and square in return for these past 13yrs of being bled dry every which way they ever wanted.
+ 1 - spot on Sir! Well bloddy said!

ellisd82

685 posts

208 months

Thursday 13th May 2010
quotequote all
MSTRBKR said:
The fixed cameras I can deal with, but it's the wkers in the vans that are the real tax on the motorist by only appearing every few weeks to catch people out. I refuse to believe that they improve road safety.
Exactly - if they where there to improve safety, then they are not providing a safe road when the camera is not there. And they can't say funding is the issue with it being temporary.

cazzer

8,883 posts

248 months

Thursday 13th May 2010
quotequote all
ctallchris said:


* Facilitate the switch to green cars by creating a national car recharging network.
Excellent but we allready have the network in place it's called the national grid. What we need are standards so you dont end up with a thousand sockets and voltages at each one.
Probably means if you don't have a green car we'll re-charge you for it.....again and again and again.....

gaz9185

105 posts

171 months

Thursday 13th May 2010
quotequote all
Doubt it........there'll be some excuse and now they have cuddled up with the Lib Dems they can maintain their "partners" are against it.
As the topic has expanded, who also remembers the Conservative pledge last time to reinstate the rolling date for 'historic' vehicles which the previous miserable lot stopped? The UK is the only country in Europe which doesn't have one now - many other countries outside Europe do also - so if you'd like to see details just ask FBHVC (e-mail through website) to give you the last available list. Not sure they are pushing the case for this anyway but no excuses now.