The standing mile, THAT video, and engine specs
Discussion
Caddyshack said:
The tyres back then were way off compared to now whereas the 993 was 4wd but got monstered. Evo recently said that the press cars were openly nobbled with a factory wink. My guess it was a hot engine but a good car running well on modern tyres is probably up to it.
Clarkson was and always has been a big advocate and supporter of good British cars and notably TVR so he could have easily told the others to ease up or added nos?
It made me buy a brand new Cerbie too (aged 25)
I think that is more a bit of an old wives tale tbh..Clarkson was and always has been a big advocate and supporter of good British cars and notably TVR so he could have easily told the others to ease up or added nos?
It made me buy a brand new Cerbie too (aged 25)
Edited by Caddyshack on Thursday 17th October 17:11
Edited by Caddyshack on Thursday 17th October 17:14
Press cars were rolling roaded and made factory figures. I think it is more the optimistic factory dyno inflating figures..
Byker28i said:
Jhonno said:
Didn't the prototype/pre production engines run the 4.5 style induction on the 4.2? Iirc the top gear road test one also had the same induction.
I guess thats a good thing as the 4.2's fitted with a 4.5 bottom end make about 380bhp when mapped, but a good 4.5 mapped with all the knowledge now (whirlwind etc) makes 400-420bhp.The thing is, the Cerbera didn't just beat the cars by a little, it beat them by a lot. We know looking at fighting torque that you need some pretty good machinery to beat the Cerbera and looking over the results that launch technique made more difference than bhp.
So would a few more bhp from the factory, make that much difference over the clarkson run. The launches look similar from all cars.
I think it's just a quick car.
Now thats not to say it wouldn't be beat by even todays hot hatches, but at the time I'd say that was valid.
Jhonno said:
Caddyshack said:
The tyres back then were way off compared to now whereas the 993 was 4wd but got monstered. Evo recently said that the press cars were openly nobbled with a factory wink. My guess it was a hot engine but a good car running well on modern tyres is probably up to it.
Clarkson was and always has been a big advocate and supporter of good British cars and notably TVR so he could have easily told the others to ease up or added nos?
It made me buy a brand new Cerbie too (aged 25)
I think that is more a bit of an old wives tale tbh..Clarkson was and always has been a big advocate and supporter of good British cars and notably TVR so he could have easily told the others to ease up or added nos?
It made me buy a brand new Cerbie too (aged 25)
Edited by Caddyshack on Thursday 17th October 17:11
Edited by Caddyshack on Thursday 17th October 17:14
Press cars were rolling roaded and made factory figures. I think it is more the optimistic factory dyno inflating figures..
Byker28i said:
What's that engine producing now Brummie? I remember you had some good figures from it.
627@7029rpm, it’s the revs now with bigger heads and a cam specced to go with ITB’s it carries on, it was still making 611@7500, didn’t want to rev it further, but at a speed event could be useful.Byker28i said:
Holy Dingbats !Cerb £40K
911 £94K
I'd forgotten the level of that difference
It's like giving Magnum 450s away with boxes of Rice Crispies !
.... and I'VE got one in my Garage
That video.! The Ajp is that good at wide open throttle and that gap was only going to get bigger and its repeatable.!
Its a race engine that sounds quite agricultural at idle.
It has something to do with the with the flat plane geometry v angle and offset that makes it a very special beast in the way it fires the cylinders it runs like 2 4 cyl engines rather than 1 v8. With this layout the waste spark is not wasted it sets up pulses in the exhaust that takes the scavenging to a next level and makes for a very efficient air pump at wot and has no use for a turbo or multi valve or vvt
It was referred to at the time as the big bang engine and was very hush hush...
Its a race engine that sounds quite agricultural at idle.
It has something to do with the with the flat plane geometry v angle and offset that makes it a very special beast in the way it fires the cylinders it runs like 2 4 cyl engines rather than 1 v8. With this layout the waste spark is not wasted it sets up pulses in the exhaust that takes the scavenging to a next level and makes for a very efficient air pump at wot and has no use for a turbo or multi valve or vvt
It was referred to at the time as the big bang engine and was very hush hush...
We repeated it a good few years ago with modern cars and quite a lot of tuned up stuff and the Cerbera still held up OK. Things have moved on, I remember the 4wd Lambos were incredible at launching and it was very much about the launch. Fluff that and it was a long way back.
I took on a Monaro that was supercharged, launch control, traction control, was said to have 550bhp. That launched well, I caught him by second gear and by the time I was in third there was no way it was coming back.
I took on a Monaro that was supercharged, launch control, traction control, was said to have 550bhp. That launched well, I caught him by second gear and by the time I was in third there was no way it was coming back.
...And guys - don't forget this one!
To say the Enzo owner was p***ed is an understatement!
https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=youtube+video...
Nick
To say the Enzo owner was p***ed is an understatement!
https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=youtube+video...
Nick
Yeah that was an LS engined one though, its fitted with a Harrop 112 supercharger and made 580bhp in a 1200Kg car
details here:
https://ls1tech.com/forums/pcm-diagnostics-tuning/...
details here:
https://ls1tech.com/forums/pcm-diagnostics-tuning/...
Gassing Station | Cerbera | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff