Definition of a supercar

Definition of a supercar

Author
Discussion

colinrob

1,198 posts

252 months

Thursday 18th April 2019
quotequote all
Nano2nd said:
they are not all really running costs, the only real running costs are the service and tyres, that looks like a major service as an oil service is fixed price at £485.

for comparison I've had mine for just under a year and had: an oil service, aircon service and brake fluid change for just over £700 all in.


Edited by Nano2nd on Monday 4th February 15:10
Well I think they are supercar prices when it comes to clutches, just had mine done the release bearing on its own was £499 iirc

200Plus Club

10,804 posts

279 months

Thursday 18th April 2019
quotequote all
colinrob said:
Well I think they are supercar prices when it comes to clutches, just had mine done the release bearing on its own was £499 iirc
Out of interest how much for a clutch fitted? V8 or v10?
I was quoted £3.5k for an a.c. compressor and similar for clutch on a v8 manual due to engine out etc.

jakesmith

9,461 posts

172 months

Friday 19th April 2019
quotequote all
200Plus Club said:
Out of interest how much for a clutch fitted? V8 or v10?
I was quoted £3.5k for an a.c. compressor and similar for clutch on a v8 manual due to engine out etc.
Some Indi's can do the compressor without removing the engine now. I take mine to The Phirm in Surrey & they can do it for about half what you quoted.

CaptainSensib1e

1,434 posts

222 months

Friday 26th April 2019
quotequote all
Thread bump!

Just enjoyed reading through this thread, great to read everyone's opinions on what is such a subjective topic.

For me a supercar was always a performance orientated car that is unobtainable for the masses. But how to quantify that?

This is my checklist (all in the name of fun, feel free to disgree!)

- No more than 2 seats
- Engine located behind the driver
- Costs more than 5x the average salary when new (average salary in the UK is £29k, which means the car has to cost at least £145,000)

On that basis an Audi R8 (cost from £125k) isn't a supercar but a Lamborghini Huracan (cost from £155k) is a super car.



ferdi p

1,519 posts

173 months

Friday 26th April 2019
quotequote all
CaptainSensib1e said:
Thread bump!

Just enjoyed reading through this thread, great to read everyone's opinions on what is such a subjective topic.

For me a supercar was always a performance orientated car that is unobtainable for the masses. But how to quantify that?

This is my checklist (all in the name of fun, feel free to disgree!)

- No more than 2 seats
- Engine located behind the driver
- Costs more than 5x the average salary when new (average salary in the UK is £29k, which means the car has to cost at least £145,000)

On that basis an Audi R8 (cost from £125k) isn't a supercar but a Lamborghini Huracan (cost from £155k) is a super car.
So an F1 isn't a supercar!? wink

Durzel

12,288 posts

169 months

Friday 26th April 2019
quotequote all
Quite a few obvious supercars would've been less than £145,000 new. Is that adjusted for inflation? smile

Pioneer

1,311 posts

132 months

Friday 26th April 2019
quotequote all
£15,000 would of got you a shiny new Miura in the 60's. If only I had a time machine frown

Larry5.2

496 posts

109 months

Friday 26th April 2019
quotequote all
Honda Accord has a quicker 0-60 time than a Muira, as per www.zeroto60times.com...

_Leg_

2,798 posts

212 months

Friday 26th April 2019
quotequote all
CaptainSensib1e said:
Thread bump!

Just enjoyed reading through this thread, great to read everyone's opinions on what is such a subjective topic.

For me a supercar was always a performance orientated car that is unobtainable for the masses. But how to quantify that?

This is my checklist (all in the name of fun, feel free to disgree!)

- No more than 2 seats
- Engine located behind the driver
- Costs more than 5x the average salary when new (average salary in the UK is £29k, which means the car has to cost at least £145,000)

On that basis an Audi R8 (cost from £125k) isn't a supercar but a Lamborghini Huracan (cost from £155k) is a super car.
Every front engined V12 Ferrari.

Also pricing is subjective to when it was built and sold new. A 250 GTO was $18,000 in the States when new and if any car was ever a supercar, that's it. Front engined V12 too.

To be fair the term 'Supercar' doesn't really do it justice. What a thing, I'm feeling all improper just looking at a still photo of one.


sparta6

3,704 posts

101 months

Friday 26th April 2019
quotequote all
_Leg_ said:
Every front engined V12 Ferrari.

Also pricing is subjective to when it was built and sold new. A 250 GTO was $18,000 in the States when new and if any car was ever a supercar, that's it. Front engined V12 too.

To be fair the term 'Supercar' doesn't really do it justice. What a thing, I'm feeling all improper just looking at a still photo of one.

Lovely.

Designed and built before EU regs etc etc etc.
It was a free world then, especially if you had $18K smile

CaptainSensib1e

1,434 posts

222 months

Friday 26th April 2019
quotequote all
Durzel said:
Quite a few obvious supercars would've been less than £145,000 new. Is that adjusted for inflation? smile
Yes, 5x times whatever the average wage was when the car was new!

That GTO is stunning. To be fair it was designed before road cars were built in a mid-engined configuration. So perhaps my definaition is wrong as it would automatically exclude anything made before the mid-60s.

EDIT:
From wikipedia:
The Ferrari 250 GTO is a GT car produced by Ferrari from 1962 to 1964 for homologation into the FIA's Group 3 Grand Touring Car category

So it's a Grand Tourer rather than a super car wink

MDL111

6,983 posts

178 months

Friday 26th April 2019
quotequote all
Pioneer said:
£15,000 would of got you a shiny new Miura in the 60's. If only I had a time machine frown
What was the average salary though?

_Leg_

2,798 posts

212 months

Friday 26th April 2019
quotequote all
CaptainSensib1e said:
Durzel said:
Quite a few obvious supercars would've been less than £145,000 new. Is that adjusted for inflation? smile
Yes, 5x times whatever the average wage was when the car was new!

That GTO is stunning. To be fair it was designed before road cars were built in a mid-engined configuration. So perhaps my definaition is wrong as it would automatically exclude anything made before the mid-60s.

EDIT:
From wikipedia:
The Ferrari 250 GTO is a GT car produced by Ferrari from 1962 to 1964 for homologation into the FIA's Group 3 Grand Touring Car category

So it's a Grand Tourer rather than a super car wink
Tbf an F12 could be described as a GT. It could also be described as a Supercar. Both would be wrong. It should be described as a murderous bd. I wouldn’t have it any other way. :-)

It’s all semantics though and the tone of the thread is clearly lighthearted. As we the ‘pistonheads’ of this world come under more and more attacks I propose that all cars that aren’t boring Euro or Jap boxes are super cars and we, the drivers, unite. No longer shall an R8 be scorned in the supercar forums, no more shall the Boxster driver be asked for a short back and sides, welcome to the chavved up Saxo, come hither and share our bread I say to the dropped Nissan with an exhaust you could hide a mini in. Come all, unite, scorn the Prius, show your arse to the environmentalists, flip the bird to the speed restricters and waggle your waggly bits in the general direction of the autonomous car brigade for we are the Pistonheads and we shall not leave with a whimper but with a crescendos of internal combustion.

It’s my birthday and I’m in the hot tub with a bottle of gin. ;-)

Nano2nd

3,426 posts

257 months

Friday 26th April 2019
quotequote all
CaptainSensib1e said:
Thread bump!

Just enjoyed reading through this thread, great to read everyone's opinions on what is such a subjective topic.

For me a supercar was always a performance orientated car that is unobtainable for the masses. But how to quantify that?

This is my checklist (all in the name of fun, feel free to disgree!)

- No more than 2 seats
- Engine located behind the driver
- Costs more than 5x the average salary when new (average salary in the UK is £29k, which means the car has to cost at least £145,000)

On that basis an Audi R8 (cost from £125k) isn't a supercar but a Lamborghini Huracan (cost from £155k) is a super car.
so your saying a McLaren 540c isn't a supercar but a £147k R8 Spyder v10 Performance is?

Trev450

6,328 posts

173 months

Friday 26th April 2019
quotequote all
_Leg_ said:
Tbf an F12 could be described as a GT. It could also be described as a Supercar. Both would be wrong. It should be described as a murderous bd. I wouldn’t have it any other way. :-)

It’s all semantics though and the tone of the thread is clearly lighthearted. As we the ‘pistonheads’ of this world come under more and more attacks I propose that all cars that aren’t boring Euro or Jap boxes are super cars and we, the drivers, unite. No longer shall an R8 be scorned in the supercar forums, no more shall the Boxster driver be asked for a short back and sides, welcome to the chavved up Saxo, come hither and share our bread I say to the dropped Nissan with an exhaust you could hide a mini in. Come all, unite, scorn the Prius, show your arse to the environmentalists, flip the bird to the speed restricters and waggle your waggly bits in the general direction of the autonomous car brigade for we are the Pistonheads and we shall not leave with a whimper but with a crescendos of internal combustion.

It’s my birthday and I’m in the hot tub with a bottle of gin. ;-)
Whole-heartedly agree and could not have put it better myself. And that's not just because I own an R8.smile

sparta6

3,704 posts

101 months

Friday 26th April 2019
quotequote all
CaptainSensib1e said:
Yes, 5x times whatever the average wage was when the car was new!

That GTO is stunning. To be fair it was designed before road cars were built in a mid-engined configuration. So perhaps my definaition is wrong as it would automatically exclude anything made before the mid-60s.

EDIT:
From wikipedia:
The Ferrari 250 GTO is a GT car produced by Ferrari from 1962 to 1964 for homologation into the FIA's Group 3 Grand Touring Car category

So it's a Grand Tourer rather than a super car wink
Actually many mid-engine Ferrari's were heavy and over-engineered GT's, rather than lightweight sports cars, starting with the Boxer.
The fact that their performance was still above that of their lightweight competitors says it all.

Larry5.2

496 posts

109 months

Friday 26th April 2019
quotequote all
_Leg_ said:
Tbf an F12 could be described as a GT. It could also be described as a Supercar. Both would be wrong. It should be described as a murderous bd. I wouldn’t have it any other way. :-)

It’s all semantics though and the tone of the thread is clearly lighthearted. As we the ‘pistonheads’ of this world come under more and more attacks I propose that all cars that aren’t boring Euro or Jap boxes are super cars and we, the drivers, unite. No longer shall an R8 be scorned in the supercar forums, no more shall the Boxster driver be asked for a short back and sides, welcome to the chavved up Saxo, come hither and share our bread I say to the dropped Nissan with an exhaust you could hide a mini in. Come all, unite, scorn the Prius, show your arse to the environmentalists, flip the bird to the speed restricters and waggle your waggly bits in the general direction of the autonomous car brigade for we are the Pistonheads and we shall not leave with a whimper but with a crescendos of internal combustion.

It’s my birthday and I’m in the hot tub with a bottle of gin. ;-)
Hear, hear! Stop the petty factions and unite against the common enemy....

CaptainSensib1e

1,434 posts

222 months

Friday 26th April 2019
quotequote all
Nano2nd said:
CaptainSensib1e said:
Thread bump!

Just enjoyed reading through this thread, great to read everyone's opinions on what is such a subjective topic.

For me a supercar was always a performance orientated car that is unobtainable for the masses. But how to quantify that?

This is my checklist (all in the name of fun, feel free to disgree!)

- No more than 2 seats
- Engine located behind the driver
- Costs more than 5x the average salary when new (average salary in the UK is £29k, which means the car has to cost at least £145,000)

On that basis an Audi R8 (cost from £125k) isn't a supercar but a Lamborghini Huracan (cost from £155k) is a super car.
so your saying a McLaren 540c isn't a supercar but a £147k R8 Spyder v10 Performance is?
The McLaren isn't a supercar and the R8 is.....borderline. To be fair the R8 packs a 600bhp+ V10 whereas the McLaren only has 530bhp turbo V8. About the same as your get in many smaller German super saloons. So the R8 is league up in raw performance terms.

67Dino

3,587 posts

106 months

Friday 26th April 2019
quotequote all
As well as the factors of performance and cost, think a Supercar needs to be something special enough that kids would have a wall poster of it. So that means exotic looking and reasonably rare, as well as pricey and pacey.

av185

18,530 posts

128 months

Friday 26th April 2019
quotequote all
Yep so that immediately excludes any ubiquitous pimped up TT 'Aldi' then.