Collecting Cars auction results
Discussion
C4ME said:
bish_345 said:
None of the UK sites is a patch on Bring a Trailer in the US at present. Bring a Trailer is completely transparent and maintains an online archive of every auction (whether the car sold or not) containing the entirety of the bidding and the comments on the car. The real difference between Bring a Trailer and eg CC is the "comment" section. The "comment" section in CC seem to be little more than a recital of placed bids. In the case of Bring a Trailer, reading the comments is like reading a PH marque specific forum thread interspersed with occasional bids. The auction site attracts a very large audience ( 125,000 views and 800+ comments on a Miura last month). The comments invariably include very pertinent and/or helpfully geeky observations from knowledgeable people. Admittedly you have to wade through quite a few simplistic cheerleading comments (but that's just the less bottled up US character showing its appreciation for the excitement of an auction). It is the benefit of a car going under this very public microscope of a large critical audience, rather than any "due diligence" by the auction company, that would persuade me to buy on Bring a Trailer as opposed to CC. Plus, the BaT fee is capped at $5,000 rather than the c.$7,700 of CC. So the chap who bought the very nice Miura for $990k only paid a $5k buyer's premium. Compare that to Bonhams/Sotheby's et al......
I had not looked at BaT for a good few years with it being US based and have just spent an hour browsing it. You are right it is a level above anything else out there and they should really bring it over here. The comments and transparancy make it so much better. Rob_F said:
SFTWend said:
They only have a fraction of the overheads compared to a traditional auction house so to expect some due diligence in exchange for the 6% buyers fee is not unreasonable.
I think this is a fair point. I was under the impression, certainly at the outset, that CC had a value proposition over and above a generic auction site. The fact it does not, and that one can't really rely on the description anymore than you could on eBay, puts me off anyway. Whether it puts others off or the market as a whole I have no idea.Looking at the advertisements on CC invariably when they say FSH they list it, which isn't something you see very often, so it's not too difficult to pick up the phone yourself and check if you want?
I would have thought the value proposition of online auctions platforms like CC and The Market is the 0% commission on either the buy / sell point, unlike a traditional you can not only see the car but test drive it should you wish and given the issues of monies not being paid by certain other traditional auction houses, the monetary transaction is direct between buyer and seller. The biggest downside for me is the short window meaning it's difficult to arrange a pre-purchase inspection and it would useful to have a guide on pricing.
500 Miles said:
I was lucky enough this week to win the auction of the red F355 - the car does look in great condition and I’m looking forward to seeing it in the flesh.
I managed to get the polar silver 993 Turbo last month and have been really impressed with it - the car is even better in the flesh than it was in the photos.
Really impressed by Collecting Cars so far.
Well, CINE shares ain't paying for that, that's for sure. Looks stunning. I managed to get the polar silver 993 Turbo last month and have been really impressed with it - the car is even better in the flesh than it was in the photos.
Really impressed by Collecting Cars so far.
500 Miles said:
I was lucky enough this week to win the auction of the red F355 - the car does look in great condition and I’m looking forward to seeing it in the flesh.
I managed to get the polar silver 993 Turbo last month and have been really impressed with it - the car is even better in the flesh than it was in the photos.
Really impressed by Collecting Cars so far.
Nice one - please post up when you have collected your 355. I've bid on a couple of CC cars to date but have not been successful - always good to hear folks experiences.I managed to get the polar silver 993 Turbo last month and have been really impressed with it - the car is even better in the flesh than it was in the photos.
Really impressed by Collecting Cars so far.
C4ME said:
I am sure these online auctions will improve as competition hots up between them. I have been looking at one today that I have not seen before and really like it www.themarket.co.uk Takes many of the principles of CC but does a couple of things in a better way in my opinion.
Also the new Car & Classic one includes an escrow service which I really like (but overall I don't think C&C do other bits as well).
The Market has been going longer, and have more of the 'firsts' out of the two, despite what CC puts out (in the form of paid articles). The Market are good and easy to deal with from both a buying and selling perspective, and the listings are well written (plus the hundreds of photos help, and you can add comments, like BaT, though it doesn't have that community so far). I've used a lot of the traditional auctions, but not used CC so far. Got put off by certain staff member's social media attitude a while ago. Also the new Car & Classic one includes an escrow service which I really like (but overall I don't think C&C do other bits as well).
Edited by C4ME on Monday 27th July 22:24
lukeharding said:
The Market are good and easy to deal with from both a buying and selling perspective, and the listings are well written
I don’t know much about them, except that they described the SZ they sold earlier this year as ‘near concours’, when it looked to be a bit of a project. Makes them difficult to trust, for me.Bobo W said:
Rob_F said:
SFTWend said:
They only have a fraction of the overheads compared to a traditional auction house so to expect some due diligence in exchange for the 6% buyers fee is not unreasonable.
I think this is a fair point. I was under the impression, certainly at the outset, that CC had a value proposition over and above a generic auction site. The fact it does not, and that one can't really rely on the description anymore than you could on eBay, puts me off anyway. Whether it puts others off or the market as a whole I have no idea.Looking at the advertisements on CC invariably when they say FSH they list it, which isn't something you see very often, so it's not too difficult to pick up the phone yourself and check if you want?
I would have thought the value proposition of online auctions platforms like CC and The Market is the 0% commission on either the buy / sell point, unlike a traditional you can not only see the car but test drive it should you wish and given the issues of monies not being paid by certain other traditional auction houses, the monetary transaction is direct between buyer and seller. The biggest downside for me is the short window meaning it's difficult to arrange a pre-purchase inspection and it would useful to have a guide on pricing.
As per another poster's comment though the prices are close enough to some dealers that I'd probably just look at well regarded dealers than chance my arm here. Might make more sense if you're buying either a lot of cars or have a higher risk tolerance, though.
jamies30 said:
I don’t know much about them, except that they described the SZ they sold earlier this year as ‘near concours’, when it looked to be a bit of a project. Makes them difficult to trust, for me.
I have bought 2 cars from The Market (DB9 Volante and a Merc SL). Both times they were accurate, honest and a pleasure to deal with.I've sold two cars on CC in the last few weeks (355 Spider and 1954 Beetle) - I've been more than happy with both deals, and I've had two very happy buyers too.
Having changed cars so many times over the years, both these sales we undoubtably the smoothest sales I've ever made - I couldn't recommend the site enough.
Having changed cars so many times over the years, both these sales we undoubtably the smoothest sales I've ever made - I couldn't recommend the site enough.
will_ said:
Another fairly strong set of results from Silverstone Auctions over the weekend, given the circumstances.
Some lots did well but overall it seemed like a bot of a struggle when I watched a bit of it. Quite a few cars were no reserve so the sell through rate looks good. 2k km Testarossa sold for £70k with an estimate of £100k to £120k. Don’t know anything about them and car could be a dog but seeemed cheap !
Early flat floor Series 1 E- Tyrpe sold for £100k with an estimate of £130k to £150k. Again could be a bad car !
Cheib said:
2k km Testarossa sold for £70k with an estimate of £100k to £120k. Don’t know anything about them and car could be a dog but seeemed cheap !
I think that is a bit of a correction. There are plenty of Testarossas out there wanting new owners and many have inflated price tags. Unlike a lot of Ferraris, I think youd really have to want one of these if that makes sense. There are plenty of other models that are better IMO.Cheib said:
will_ said:
Another fairly strong set of results from Silverstone Auctions over the weekend, given the circumstances.
Some lots did well but overall it seemed like a bot of a struggle when I watched a bit of it. Quite a few cars were no reserve so the sell through rate looks good. 2k km Testarossa sold for £70k with an estimate of £100k to £120k. Don’t know anything about them and car could be a dog but seeemed cheap !
Early flat floor Series 1 E- Tyrpe sold for £100k with an estimate of £130k to £150k. Again could be a bad car !
C4ME said:
If they are making up crap they get called out for it by the buyer or by other contributors to the thread. The advantage of a large comunity on BaT as they seem to have lots of comments and contributers on each car. Gets robust on occasion but overall it seems more open and authentic with cars subjected to better scrutiny.
Correct. In addition, there is a simple procedure whereby any comment can be "flagged as non-constructive". This prompts a review of the comment by the BaT staff. So to that extent the comments are moderated.Edited by C4ME on Monday 3rd August 19:15
BaT's stated philosophy on allowing comments is: "Each auction has a comment thread where the BaT community discusses the vehicle and asks the seller questions. Sellers are encouraged to be active participants in the comments section - answering questions and engaging with the community increases bidder confidence".
I think they are right.
ettore said:
Cheib said:
will_ said:
Another fairly strong set of results from Silverstone Auctions over the weekend, given the circumstances.
Some lots did well but overall it seemed like a bot of a struggle when I watched a bit of it. Quite a few cars were no reserve so the sell through rate looks good. 2k km Testarossa sold for £70k with an estimate of £100k to £120k. Don’t know anything about them and car could be a dog but seeemed cheap !
Early flat floor Series 1 E- Tyrpe sold for £100k with an estimate of £130k to £150k. Again could be a bad car !
It seemed to me that the majority of sold cars hammered for slightly under low reserve, with only the 15% premium (12.5 plus VAT) taking the total "sold" price into the range of the estimate. Much the same as has been the case in most auctions for the last year or two - i.e. the majority of cars are not being bid beyond low estimate.
Then again, someone paid 158k for a 1972 Bentley Corniche convertible....
bish_345 said:
ettore said:
Cheib said:
will_ said:
Another fairly strong set of results from Silverstone Auctions over the weekend, given the circumstances.
Some lots did well but overall it seemed like a bot of a struggle when I watched a bit of it. Quite a few cars were no reserve so the sell through rate looks good. 2k km Testarossa sold for £70k with an estimate of £100k to £120k. Don’t know anything about them and car could be a dog but seeemed cheap !
Early flat floor Series 1 E- Tyrpe sold for £100k with an estimate of £130k to £150k. Again could be a bad car !
It seemed to me that the majority of sold cars hammered for slightly under low reserve, with only the 15% premium (12.5 plus VAT) taking the total "sold" price into the range of the estimate. Much the same as has been the case in most auctions for the last year or two - i.e. the majority of cars are not being bid beyond low estimate.
Then again, someone paid 158k for a 1972 Bentley Corniche convertible....
jamies30 said:
I don’t know much about them, except that they described the SZ they sold earlier this year as ‘near concours’, when it looked to be a bit of a project. Makes them difficult to trust, for me.
I can't remember it to be honest. I've always found them to be accurate though, but a lot of it does rely on the vendor's description of a car (as with all auction houses). It is also a point that with any auction, you should always use your own judgement and inspect the cars yourself. You're the only person you can trust when it comes to large sums of money - and that goes for any and all auctions or forms of sale. I'm sure we could all go to any of the main auctioneers and find fault in a listing - it does happen, even if only because of the amount of vehicles that go through.
ettore said:
Cheib said:
will_ said:
Another fairly strong set of results from Silverstone Auctions over the weekend, given the circumstances.
Some lots did well but overall it seemed like a bot of a struggle when I watched a bit of it. Quite a few cars were no reserve so the sell through rate looks good. 2k km Testarossa sold for £70k with an estimate of £100k to £120k. Don’t know anything about them and car could be a dog but seeemed cheap !
Early flat floor Series 1 E- Tyrpe sold for £100k with an estimate of £130k to £150k. Again could be a bad car !
I’d say the sell through rate was because of realistic (or perhaps motivated) sellers as a lot of the cars were no reserve rather than strong bids.
Cheib said:
ettore said:
Cheib said:
will_ said:
Another fairly strong set of results from Silverstone Auctions over the weekend, given the circumstances.
Some lots did well but overall it seemed like a bot of a struggle when I watched a bit of it. Quite a few cars were no reserve so the sell through rate looks good. 2k km Testarossa sold for £70k with an estimate of £100k to £120k. Don’t know anything about them and car could be a dog but seeemed cheap !
Early flat floor Series 1 E- Tyrpe sold for £100k with an estimate of £130k to £150k. Again could be a bad car !
I’d say the sell through rate was because of realistic (or perhaps motivated) sellers as a lot of the cars were no reserve rather than strong bids.
Cheib said:
ettore said:
Cheib said:
will_ said:
Another fairly strong set of results from Silverstone Auctions over the weekend, given the circumstances.
Some lots did well but overall it seemed like a bot of a struggle when I watched a bit of it. Quite a few cars were no reserve so the sell through rate looks good. 2k km Testarossa sold for £70k with an estimate of £100k to £120k. Don’t know anything about them and car could be a dog but seeemed cheap !
Early flat floor Series 1 E- Tyrpe sold for £100k with an estimate of £130k to £150k. Again could be a bad car !
I’d say the sell through rate was because of realistic (or perhaps motivated) sellers as a lot of the cars were no reserve rather than strong bids.
Gassing Station | Supercar General | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff