PistonHeads.com Forum

RE: 4 Stroke Redesigned

Author
Discussion

Feliks

569 posts

150 months

Saturday 24th December 2016
quotequote all
Merry Christmas for everyone..!

https://youtu.be/wKAavHP12eY

Andrewxmas

Feliks

569 posts

150 months

Tuesday 4th April
quotequote all
Or maybe a two-wheel car would do ... There's no need for an differential and anything .. see the Segway
There is no steering wheel, and what's the return .. because let's say on wheels 1.5 meters in diameter ... for every trimmer will come ..


Andrew bowtie

Feliks

569 posts

150 months

Sunday 16th April
quotequote all

Feliks

569 posts

150 months

Tuesday 25th April
quotequote all
The general pattern aside from the constant, the power we get from a windmill is V ^ 3 x D ^ 2. So it depends on the velocity up to 3 power. Here it was measured according to the predicted theory for these dimensions, with the velocity in the gap increasing 6 times. Up to 216 times up to the third power, more than a traditional windmill with the same diameter, say 10 m / s ... The power of a traditional windmill, with a diameter of 1 meter, at this speed about 0.5 horse ... but when we equip it with such "Bombiche" of the same diameter and length, you can theoretically get 216 times more, or about 100 horsepower. Besides, you do not see any items hanging around / And it's bigger bomb than MOAB ....






Andrew coffee

Feliks

569 posts

150 months

Tuesday 25th April
quotequote all
So here was measured using Hand-held digital anemometer velocity in the slot. It was consistent with the theoretical assumption, and was 6 times higher than the nozzle entry. For example 10 m / sec give 60 m / sec. The internal veturi nozzle requires other curves to have a laminar flow. Here is a picture from Excel where you can plot these curves, up to 1 mm. Part of them turned out to be rounded .. what the traditional nozzle does not have ..
Now you need to develop a turbine, preferably as if it was Pratt & Witney, and propel hydraulics, with so much power. Only then, with hydraulics to the electric current ... and see how far we go



The fact that my drawings are simple does not mean that the matter is simple, in general, that it has not been known until now.
But using the available scientific studies, we can estimate some parameters
Here is a scientific dissertation on the turbofan engine fanning when no fuel is coming in. Despite the overflow of up to 6 different turbines, combustion chambers and turbulent flow, we get 140 km / h, a flow of 1 kg / sec. With such a flow of 1 kg / sec, the turbine car engine has a power of 100 HP. But with a laminar flow (secured by a venturi) and driving only one turbine, this power can be obtained at 40 km / h. And Feliks, unfortunately, is not a research center of the Penemude type, and a modest resident of Cracow, living in a country where intellectual values are not at the highest level and are underestimated...

http://new4stroke.com/2015_JTM_Garcia_Rosa_Windmil...

Andrewcoffeecoffee
Advertisement

GreenV8S

24,632 posts

205 months

Tuesday 25th April
quotequote all
Feliks said:
Now you need to develop a turbine, preferably as if it was Pratt & Witney, and propel hydraulics, with so much power. Only then, with hydraulics to the electric current ... and see how far we go
I'm not sure what you're trying to achieve here, but if you think you can make a vehicle faster or more efficient by putting a high drag contraption on the roof, I think you're barking up the wrong tree.

Feliks

569 posts

150 months

Wednesday 26th April
quotequote all
GreenV8S said:
I'm not sure what you're trying to achieve here, but if you think you can make a vehicle faster or more efficient by putting a high drag contraption on the roof, I think you're barking up the wrong tree.
But it is necessary to start discussions about the barking on various types of trees, There was Lord Kelvin, who until today many years after his death barked to the plane tree and said he would not fly and laugh with him. But he had no idea about aerodynamics .. But he forbade to eat good apples from apple tree because he did not know the trees.
Write your point of view on the matter, behaving exactly like him.

http://zapatopi.net/kelvin/papers/interview_aerona...

You think it's about something like this movie, with optimistic music.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bkcn8ZkvKKc


And here the bum has agreed with you completely .. because these 10 fans on alternators with a diameter of 0.5 m each, together, at a speed of 36 km / h will give us ... only 0.5 horsepower of power, which is certainly a lot Not enough for this car to drive at such speed .. and de facto go on batteries ..
Practically these fans generate only the great resistance you think of ..

But my case is far different.
Let's start with why this smolot, however, years, against Lord Kelvin. Of course not enough to have wings only. Many conditions must be met for the aircraft to fly. The speed is appropriate, the slope of the wing to the level and the corresponding air wing profile. It is only the right combination of these parameters that causes a force to be generated that is capable of flying. One of the basic prarameters is the laminar flow of air on the wing. When it's gone and there is a turbolet flow, the plane drops like a stone down.
It's just a laminar flow that causes a Boeing 747 with a weight of 500 tonnes to fly with a thrust of only 80 tonnes. And this wonderful laminar flow of many people today does not really understand it.

In my project is a pipe, relatively long, because such dimensions only allow this laminar flow, ie 10 times the resistance of the city, than in the flat board of the same diameter. But for that we get 6 times the speed of the flow, that is, 6 ^ 3 = 216 times more than this car with believers .. The power of driving is about 0.5 x 216 = ~ 100HP..addition. ..
I think you should think about eating apples from this Apple tree and eating them, the Beatles, Steve Jobs, and now it seems to me hehe

Andrew coffeebowtie

Feliks

569 posts

150 months

Friday 28th April
quotequote all
In the same way, the car will go under the wind faster and faster....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embed...


Remember that if Frank's ideas were to be made in a timely manner, then perhaps World War II would not have happened.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Whittle



Andrew coffeecoffeecoffee

Edited by Feliks on Friday 28th April 01:52

Feliks

569 posts

150 months

Tuesday 2nd May
quotequote all
So, while I was interested in the development of my Segway Car Feliks, I found some helpful solutions on the web. It turned out that with the help in developing motorization, come ... Disabled and their machines .. It's such a Segway with a chair because after all the disabled can not stand ....
And there are companies that Segwaya adapt to them ...
Now it's enough for such a vehicle, make a canopy with doors and windshield wipers, teeth do not reach us, a phone holder in which there is a speedometer and other important things, and the front energy-absorbing plastic bump so that not immediately at what, With your feet flickering .. after you get the blinkers, the vehicle becomes a capable Segway Car Feliks ..
I also see the way to develop such a car, not even a multiplayer, with the increase of wheels and the use of such solutions .. but not for acrobatics and normal driving ..
Also, I think of a small diesel engine that drives an alternator, and this whole 15kg system would give that car an unrestricted reach, of course when adding gasoline. But not much, because my four stroke engine would be as good as 30 ccm.

Here are some examples from the internet ..

Https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OXlAXwD_KA0

Https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p46F0IbYEUA

Https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uf6Gh-hPDeo

Https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z8QZ0HEoZHQ


Andrew coffee

Edited by Feliks on Tuesday 2nd May 01:42