Torque Versus BHP

Author
Discussion

wanty1974

Original Poster:

3,704 posts

249 months

Friday 19th September 2003
quotequote all
Excuse me for being a bit thick, but can someone explain the benefits of the above when buying a van?

In a nutshell, I may be buying a Merc Vito, which has three high-torque diesel engines and one lower-torque petrol. The petrol engine has higher BHP and better fuel ecomony than any of the diesels, so my question is, what do I lose out on by not having the torque the diesels can give me?

The loads wouldn't be that big - not even half a tonne.

I've posted this on General Gassing as well to get lots of response!

350zwelgje

1,820 posts

262 months

Friday 19th September 2003
quotequote all
Less torque = higher revs required.
And the worst, waiting for things to happen.
No tuned Rover V8's available as an option? So you can have the combination of best of both worlds.

Rob

350zwelgje

1,820 posts

262 months

Friday 19th September 2003
quotequote all
Less torque = higher revs required.
And the worst, waiting for things to happen.
No tuned Rover V8's available as an option? So you can have the combination of best of both worlds.

Rob

kevinday

11,641 posts

281 months

Monday 22nd September 2003
quotequote all
I would be very surprised if the petrol engine was more economical. Torque is turning power, for a van you want lots of low-down torque not higher bhp. For a van such as a Vito always go for a Turbo Diesel.

Can you give the capacities, torque and bhp figures?